Home | Volume 46 | Article number 61

Research

Determinants of quality of life among people with HIV and tuberculosis in an underserved area in Indonesia: a cross-sectional study

Determinants of quality of life among people with HIV and tuberculosis in an underserved area in Indonesia: a cross-sectional study

Elfride Irawati Sianturi1,&, Zamrotul Izzah2,3, Khoirul Huda1, Evelyn Magrid Sada1, Dyah Aryani Perwitasari4, Steven Yohanes Yulianus Mantiri5, Elsye Gunawan1

 

1Pharmacy Department, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, University of Cenderawasih, Papua, Indonesia, 2Department of Clinical Pharmacy and Pharmacology, University Medical Centre Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands, 3Department of Pharmacy Practice, Faculty of Pharmacy, Universitas Airlangga, Surabaya, Indonesia, 4Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Ahmad Dahlan, Yogyakarta, Indonesia, 5Geophysical Engineering Study Program, Department of Physics, University of Cenderawasih, Jayapura, Indonesia

 

 

&Corresponding author
Elfride Irawati Sianturi, Pharmacy Department, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, University of Cenderawasih, Papua, Indonesia

 

 

Abstract

Introduction: human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) and tuberculosis (TB) remain global health problems and impose a substantial reduction in people´s quality of life (QoL). This study aimed to assess and compare the QoL in HIV and TB patients and factors associated with QoL between those groups.

 

Methods: a cross-sectional study was conducted at a hospital clinic in Jayapura, Indonesia, between December 2022 and March 2023. Those who were aged above 18 years, diagnosed with HIV or TB infection, have been taking HIV or TB medications for at least 3 months, and provided informed consent were eligible to participate. Patients´ QoL was measured using the Bahasa Indonesia version of a validated 26-item World Health Organization Quality of Life - Brief (WHOQOL-BREF) questionnaire.

 

Results: a total of 365 patients with HIV and 125 with TB were included. The majority of participants were Papuan (75.9%) and aged 20 - 65 years (92.9%). More than half of the participants were female (56.5%), employed (50.8%), married (65.5%), and had family support (64.9%). Education level and social support were predictors of poor physical health in the HIV group, while ethnicity was a predictor in the TB group. Patients´ age was associated with poor psychological health in HIV, whereas sex was the associated factor in TB patients. Ethnicity was the only predictor of poor social relationships in those with TB. Whereas patients´ age was a predictor of poor environmental health in the HIV group, marital status, and education were predictors in the TB group. Finally, only social support was associated with poor general QoL in TB patients.

 

Conclusion: tuberculosis (TB) patients had poorer QoL than those with HIV. There is a need for more awareness to support those receiving TB treatment. In addition, further research is needed to understand in more detail the determinants of patients with drug-resistant TB, TB with HIV, and drug-resistant TB-HIV, to ensure that interventions are designed to help them.

 

 

Introduction    Down

Quality of life (QoL) is a complex, multifaceted construct that requires multiple approaches from different theoretical angles [1]. Collaborations of scientists from various disciplines are encouraged to exploit the strengths of a collaborative effort in achieving a state of quality of life [2]. A thorough understanding of subjective well-being requires knowledge of how objective conditions influence people´s evaluations of their lives regarding the context of the culture in which they live and related diseases [3]. Similarly, a complete understanding of objective indicators and how to select them requires that we understand people´s values, and have knowledge about how objective indicators influence people´s experience of well-being [1]. Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) and tuberculosis (TB) remain prioritized since the prevalence of both diseases has been increasing during the last five years in the Papua province, one of the underserved areas in Indonesia [4]. Papua has also struggled to manage the generalized of HIV epidemic [5], and TB as a common comorbidity for HIV will increase following the HIV prevalence. Antiretroviral therapy (ART) [6] and directly observed treatment short-course (DOTS) [7] have been widely available and accessed for free to all people with HIV or TB in Indonesia, including Papua. This commitment of the government to make treatments accessible may increase the health-related QoL of patients for both diseases. The level of QoL after patients receiving medication may be interesting to assess, and determinants associated with QoL may vary according to disease characteristics. Even though health-related QoL studies on TB [8] and HIV [9] have been performed in some urban areas in Indonesia, evidence remains limited in many contexts in this area. There is an urgent need to understand the impact of the diseases and current treatments on both TB and HIV patients. It also helps healthcare providers and other stakeholders to consider possible determinants of quality of life in HIV and TB patients. Therefore, this study examined the QoL among patients with HIV and TB as chronic diseases and their influencing factors.

 

 

Methods Up    Down

Study design and setting: a cross-sectional questionnaire-based study was conducted among HIV and TB patients treated at the RSUD Jayapura, a referral hospital in Jayapura-Papua, Indonesia, from December 2022 to March 2023. Jayapura, the capital of Papua province, lies in Papua Island, the most eastern of Indonesia, with a total area of 940 km2 and a population of 404.004 [10].

Study population and sample size: patients who were aged 17 years and older, both male and female and with known cases of HIV or drug-sensitive TB for at least 3 months before study enrollment were included in the study. Those who were very ill, unable to communicate, and illiterate were excluded. Purposive sampling was applied to recruit the participants. Eligible patients who attended the hospital clinic were approached individually by the researchers, who provided information about the study's background and objectives. They provided written informed consent if they agreed to participate. Participation in the study was voluntary, and the participants may withdraw at any time during the study. The sample size was determined using a single population proportion formula with a 95% confidence interval and a 5% margin of error [11]. Based on the total population of approximately 2000 patients with HIV or TB visiting the hospital clinic, the minimum sample size was 323. Finally, with the addition of 10% withdrawal, at least 355 patients were recruited.

Data collection: participants´ sociodemographic characteristics, including age (in years), sex (female or male), marital status (single, married, or divorced/widowed), education level (primary, secondary, or tertiary), occupation (unemployed, retired, or employed), monthly income, region of residence, and social support available (spouse, family, or none) were collected. Patients´ age was also categorized into 17 - 20 years (young adult), 20 - 65 years (adult), and above 65 years (older adult) [12]. Clinical information on current HIV or TB treatment was also recorded. The primary outcome measure was patients´ QoL, assessed by using the Bahasa Indonesia version of the validated 26-item of World Health Organization Quality of Life - Brief (WHOQOL-BREF) questionnaire.

The WHOQOL-BREF questionnaire is a 26-item, self-directed, non-specific questionnaire that is a short form of the WHOQOL-100 scale and publicly available [13]. Standardized instructions to the interviewers helped in the acquisition of the WHOQOL-BREF administration [14]. The questionnaire examines four domains of perceived health-related QoL, namely physical health, psychological, social relationship, and environmental health in addition to a general QoL. The first two items in the scale ask about an individual's overall perception of QoL and an individual's overall perception of their health. The other items represent a person's perception of their QoL in each of the four domains. The time span covers the last two weeks. Each item of the questionnaire is measured on a 5-point Likert scale, ranging from 1 to 5 with varying scale responses and higher values representing higher QoL. The domain scores were calculated by multiplying the mean score of each domain by four according to WHOQOL-BREF scoring manual. The QoL scores of each domain were dichotomized into “good” and “poor” with a score lower than 60 defined as “poor” [15].

Data analysis: descriptive statistics were used to describe the sociodemographic and disease characteristics of the participants. The Kolmogorov-Smirnov test and a Q-Q plot were used to evaluate whether the continuous variables had a normal distribution. Data were presented in frequencies and percentages for categorical variables and means ± standard deviations (SDs) or medians ± interquartile ranges (IQRs) for continuous variables. Furthermore, the associations between the QoL domains and current HIV or TB treatment were tested using the Mann-Whitney test. Binary logistic regression analysis was performed to identify factors associated with each QoL domain. The final multivariable models comprised covariates which were selected using a backward stepwise approach, and the final model retained variables with p-value <0.25. The results were stratified by current HIV or TB treatment and reported as odds ratios (ORs) with a 95% confidence interval (CI). All analyses were done using two-tailed tests at a significance level of 0.05. The statistical analyses were performed using the Statistical Program for Social Sciences (SPSS) version 24.0 for Windows.

Ethical consideration: in this study, participation was voluntary. The study protocol has been reviewed and approved by the ethics committee at Muhammadiyah Magelang University 029/KEPK-FIKES/II.3.AU/F/2023). All participants were required to provide written informed consent prior to data collection.

Funding: the authors (Elfride Irawati Sianturi and Steven Yohanes Yulianus Mantiri) received a grant from DIKTI (016/E5/PG.02.00.PL/2023)

 

 

Results Up    Down

Sample characteristics: in total, 490 patients were included in the study. Of them, 365 patients (74.5%) were undergoing HIV treatment, and 125 (25.5%) patients were currently treated for TB infection (Table 1). The majority of participants were aged 20 - 65 years (92.9%) at enrollment, female (56.5%), and Papuan (75.9%). More than half of the participants were employed (50.8%), married (65.5%), and had family support (64.9%).

All domains of quality of life: differences between HIV and TB treatment groups in the four domains of QoL were described in Table 2. An analysis of mean scores across individual measures showed that those with HIV had higher physical health, social relationships, environmental health, and general QoL than TB patients. The exception was seen in the domain of psychological health, where those with TB treatment had higher than those with HIV. Significant differences were found in most part of the domains except for environmental health, suggesting that TB patients had poorer QoL than those with HIV (p<0.001). In addition, the general QoL was significantly higher in the HIV group than in the TB group (p<0.001).

Physical health: whereas education level and social support were factors associated with poor physical health of HIV patients, ethnicity was associated with poor physical health of TB patients in the final multivariable models (Table 3). In Table 3, patients with HIV who had secondary education were less likely to have poor physical health (adjusted OR [aOR]: 0.21, 95%CI: 0.08 - 0.52) relative to those with primary education. HIV patients who had spouse and family support also decreased the odds of having poor physical health (aOR: 0.19, 95%CI: 0.05 - 0.66) and aOR: 0.34, 95%CI: 0.12 - 0.98, respectively). In the TB group, being non-Papuan lowered the odds of having poor physical health (aOR: 0.32, 95%CI: 0.12 - 0.88) than Papuans.

Psychological health: factors associated with poor psychological health by treatment HIV and TB treatment groups are shown in Table 4. In the HIV group, each additional yearly increase in age decreased the odds of having poor psychological health (aOR: 0.96, 95%CI: 0.94 - 0.99). Being male than female was less likely to have poor psychological health in TB patients (aOR: 0.15, 95%CI: 0.03 - 0.82).

Social relationship: Table 5 shows no variable was significantly associated with poor social relationships among patients with HIV. However, being non-Papuan was less likely to have poor social health in TB patients (aOR: 0.35, 95%CI: 0.12 - 0.98) relative to Papuans.

Environmental health: age was associated with poor environmental health in the HIV group (Table 6). An increase of one year in age of HIV patients lowered the odds of having poor environmental health (aOR: 0.96, 95%CI: 092 - 0.99), but being an older adult was 88 times more likely to have poor environmental health (aOR: 87.91, 95%CI: 1.46 - 5290.43) relative to the other age groups. In Table 6, the TB group, marital status, and level of education predicted poor environmental health. Being married increased the odds of having poor environmental health by five-fold (aOR: 5.35, 95% I: 1.26 - 22.65). TB patients who had secondary education were less likely to have poor environmental health (aOR: 0.11, 95%CI: 0.02 - 0.67).

General quality of life: after adjusting all independent variables among HIV patients, no independent variable was associated with poor general QoL (Table 7). Only social support predicted poor general QoL in TB patients. Those who had family support were twice as likely to have poor general QoL (aOR: 2.40, 95%CI: 1.06 - 5.45) relative to those supported by their spouses.

 

 

Discussion Up    Down

The study findings reveal that TB patients had poorer QoL than those with HIV. Education level and social support predicted poor physical health in the HIV group, while ethnicity was a predictor in the TB group. The age of a patient was associated with poor psychological health among HIV patients, whereas patients´ sex was the associated factor in TB patients. Furthermore, ethnicity was the only predictor of poor social relationships in those with TB. Whereas patients´ age predicted poor environmental health in the HIV group, marital status and education were predictors in the TB group. Finally, only social support was associated with poor general QoL in TB patients.

The present study provides consistent results with the previous reports. Those on HIV treatment [16,17]. Despite this, QoL in people with HIV is affected not only by the virus but also by the stigma after diagnosis. The complexity of HIV treatment is poorly explained in terms of social relationships and general QoL. It is likely that there are other variables that may have a greater impact on these areas than those used in this study. Numerous studies have shown that stigma has a significant impact on many aspects of the lives of people living with HIV, including their QoL [18-20]. Surprisingly, there is no significant determinant of poor social relationships among people with HIV. A possible explanation could be that there are other factors related to social health in addition to the existing determinants. Thus, future studies addressing more magnitude factors are warranted. Influencing factors such as fear of HIV disclosure and being stigmatized by others may have the greatest impact on the social health determinant [21,22].

Social support is shown to affect the HIV patients´ physical health and the TB patients´ general QoL. Individuals with symptomatic HIV disease might be vulnerable to visiting hospitals to collect antiretroviral drugs. Furthermore, their fear and self-acceptance will be easier to get through when social support is present, particularly when they are too sick [22]. This finding is inconsistent with a previous study that showed social support from family corresponded with better QoL among TB patients [23]. However, another study reported that social support was more likely to have poor QoL since those with TB considered emotional support as a burden to them and seemed to remind them that their disease could infect others [24]. Feelings of avoidance are common in the early course of TB medication when they tend to cause distance. These groups often seem to feel socially isolated and disconnected from friends and family, which is partly due to a lack of social-emotional skills. Contrary to previous research, people with TB are more likely to feel alone when taking medication [24].

Ethnicity became one of the predictors of poor physical health and social relationships among those with TB. This finding can occur to those with TB since it is common to find Papuans were under diagnosis and under treatment. This study showed that non-Papuans tended to have better physical health than Papuans, because non-Papuans may take coughing seriously as one of the symptoms of TB [25] and they preferred to seek help from healthcare facilities rather than using self-medication to make the cough go away. Compared to non-Papuans, Papuans may be delayed in getting diagnosed. Although the complex or residual disease may also appear to develop HIV, people living with TB have never expected to experience severe TB symptoms similar to those with HIV. Community communication and awareness of TB may be lower than HIV [26]. Being non-Papuan with TB will be more resilient to cope with disability compared to Papuans. Similar to physical health, there is an assumption that Papuans must reduce their communal activities to prevent infection to others. This may also be due to a lack of social contact and having few people to interact with on a regular basis. Even the sense of social belonging becomes distant.

Those who have at least secondary education were less likely to have poor physical health in the HIV group and poor environmental health in the TB group. Education could reduce the risk of negative reactions from others. It shows that educating people can help them understand how taking medication regularly leads to a good quality of life. Moreover, by having an education, those with TB have more exposure to how to be in good physical health compared to people who are not educated. Inadequate knowledge can lead to fear of transmission of these diseases. This can be more difficult for those who have been married, and it leads to less intimacy with their spouse and children. It is thought that age is related to people's ability to engage in proactive coping, where they are able to focus on the positive rather than just the fear of their illness [27]. Getting older makes people more resilient to achieve happiness and life balance than the effect of HIV on neuro-physiological [28]. Moreover, perhaps the issue of transmission is difficult to exclude, and it might add feelings of loneliness, especially among younger people with HIV since they will face the reality of their future seeming to disappear. Meanwhile, for psychological health, male sex influences psychological health among those with TB.

Being married was a predictor of poor environmental health, and it may be more likely to be alone among those with TB. It makes sense that these groups would automatically make distance since the diseases were diagnosed to them. It may be related to how people become infected. Although these barriers are common to people with HIV, this study found that those on TB treatment were more vulnerable than those with HIV. Of note, TB can spread from person to person through the air nearby, and people who breathe in the TB bacteria can easily get TB. This study has included a relatively large sample of thoroughly diagnosed patients with TB and HIV characteristic measures, as well as a relatively large number of indigenous Papuans and non-Papuans. However, the cross-sectional nature of the self-reported study precludes cause-and-effect statements, as well as the potential for reverse causality, and makes it difficult to establish causality. However, these cross-sectional data allow us to better understand which important patient factors are associated with health-related QoL for future studies.

 

 

Conclusion Up    Down

tuberculosis patients had poorer QoL than those with HIV in the study population. Age, sex, ethnicity, education level, marital status, and social support were shown to have an association with the different health-related QoL domains. There is a need for more awareness to support those receiving TB treatment. In addition, further research is needed to understand in more detail the determinants of patients with drug-resistant TB, TB with HIV, and drug-resistant TB-HIV, to ensure that interventions are designed to help them.

What is known about this topic

  • Quality of life (QoL) is a complex, multifaceted construct that requires multiple approaches from different theoretical angles;
  • The level of QoL after patients receive medication may be interesting to assess and determinants associated with QoL may vary to disease characteristics;
  • Those on HIV treatment were generally more likely to have better QoL than those on TB treatment.

What this study adds

  • Those on HIV treatment were generally more likely to have better QoL than those on TB treatment;
  • Feelings of avoidance are common in the early course of TB medication, and they often seem to feel socially isolated and disconnected from friends and family, which is partly due to a lack of social-emotional skills.

 

 

Competing interests Up    Down

The authors declare no competing interests.

 

 

Authors' contributions Up    Down

Conceived and designed the study: Elfride Irawati Sianturi, Dyah Aryani Perwitasari, Steven Yohanes Yulianus Mantiri. Analyzed the data: Elfride Irawati Sianturi, Dyah Aryani Perwitasari, Zamrotul Izzah, Khoirul Huda, Evelyn Magrid Sada. Wrote the paper: Elfride Irawati Sianturi, Dyah Aryani Perwitasari, Zamrotul Izzah, Khoirul Huda, Evelyn Magrid Sada, Steven Yohanes Yulianus Mantiri, and Elsye Gunawan. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

 

 

Acknowledgments Up    Down

The authors would like to express their gratitude to the mothers who participated in this study.

 

 

Tables Up    Down

Table 1: patient characteristics by current HIV or TB treatment

Table 2: domains of health-related quality of life by current HIV or TB treatment

Table 3: factors associated with poor physical health by current HIV or TB treatment

Table 4: factors associated with poor psychological health by current HIV or TB treatment

Table 5: factors associated with poor social health by current HIV or TB treatment

Table 6: factors associated with poor environmental health by current HIV or TB treatment

Table 7: factors associated with poor general quality of life by current HIV or TB treatment

 

 

References Up    Down

  1. Pequeno NPF, Cabral NLA, Marchioni DM, Lima SCVC, Lyra CO. Quality of life assessment instruments for adults: a systematic review of population-based studies. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2020 Jun 30;18(1):208. PubMed | Google Scholar

  2. Megari K. Quality of life in chronic disease patients. Health Psychol Res. 2013 Sep 23;1(3):e27. PubMed | Google Scholar

  3. Haraldstad K, Wahl A, Andenæs R, Andersen JR, Andersen MH, Beisland E et al. A systematic review of quality of life research in medicine and health sciences. Qual Life Res. 2019 Oct;28(10):2641-2650. PubMed | Google Scholar

  4. Sianturi EI, Perwitasari DA, Soltief SN, Atiqul Islam M, Geboers B, Taxis K. Health literacy of people living with HIV in a rural area in Indonesia: A cross-sectional study. Health Soc Care Community. 2021 Jan;29(1):127-134. PubMed | Google Scholar

  5. Indonesian National AIDS Commission. Global AIDS Response Progress Reporting: Indonesia Country Progress Report 2014. Indonesia National AIDS Commission technical report. 2014. Google Scholar

  6. World Health Organization. Consolidated guidelines on the use of antiretroviral drugs for treating and preventing HIV infection: recommendations for a public health approach. Geneva. 2013.

  7. Indonesia KR. Pedoman Nasional Pengendalian Tuberkulosis-Keputusan Menteri Kesehatan Republik Indonesia Nomor 364. Kementerian Kesehatan Republik Indonesia. 2011;99. Google Scholar

  8. Juliasih NN, Mertaniasih NM, Hadi C, Soedarsono, Sari RM, Alfian IN. Factors affecting tuberculosis patients´ quality of life in Surabaya, Indonesia. J Multidiscip Healthc. 2020;13:1475-1480. PubMed | Google Scholar

  9. Handayani S, Ratnasari NY, Husna PH, Susanto T. Quality of Life People Living with HIV/AIDS and Its Characteristic from a VCT Centre in Indonesia. Ethiop J Health Sci. 2019;29(6):759-766. PubMed | Google Scholar

  10. Sianturi EI, Latifah E, Soltief SN, Sihombing RB, Simaremare ES, Effendy C et al. Understanding reasons for lack of acceptance of HIV programs among indigenous Papuans: a qualitative study in Indonesia. Sex Health. 2022 Aug;19(4):367-375. PubMed | Google Scholar

  11. Anokye M Adam. Sample size determination in survey research. J Sci Res Rep. 2020;26(5):90-97. Google Scholar

  12. Chaiyachati KH, Ogbuoji O, Price M, Suthar AB, Negussie EK, Bärnighausen T. Interventions to improve adherence to antiretroviral therapy: A rapid systematic review. AIDS. 2014;28(Suppl 2):S187-S204. PubMed | Google Scholar

  13. WHO. WHOQOL User Manual. 1998.

  14. Muhammad NN, Shatri H, Djoerban Z, Abdullah M. Uji kesahihan dan keandalan kuesioner World Health Organization Quality of Life-HIV Bref dalam bahasa indonesia untuk mengukur kualitas hidup pasien HIV/AIDS. Jurnal Penyakit Dalam Indonesia. 2017 Sep 1;4(3):112-8. Google Scholar

  15. Silva PA, Soares SM, Santos JF, Silva LB. Cut-off point for WHOQOL-bref as a measure of quality of life of older adults. Rev Saude Publica. 2014 Jun;48(3):390-7. PubMed | Google Scholar

  16. Hailu T, Yitayal M, Yazachew L. Health-related quality of life and associated factors among adult HIV mono-infected and TB/HIV co-infected patients in public health facilities in northeast Ethiopia: A comparative cross-sectional study. Patient Prefer Adherence. 2020;14:1873-1887. PubMed | Google Scholar

  17. Akinboro AO, Akinyemi SO, Olaitan PB, Raji AA, Popoola AA, Awoyemi OR et al. Quality of life of Nigerians living with human immunodeficiency virus. Pan Afr Med J. 2014;18:234. PubMed | Google Scholar

  18. Andersson GZ, Reinius M, Eriksson LE, Svedhem V, Esfahani FM, Deuba K et al. Stigma reduction interventions in people living with HIV to improve health-related quality of life. Lancet HIV. 2020 Feb;7(2):e129-e140. PubMed | Google Scholar

  19. Zeluf-Andersson G, Eriksson LE, Schönnesson LN, Höijer J, Mönehall P, Ekström AM. Beyond viral suppression: the quality of life of people living with HIV in Sweden. AIDS Care - Psychol Socio-Med Asp AIDSHIV. 2019;31(4):403-412. PubMed | Google Scholar

  20. Nobre N, Pereira M, Roine RP, Sintonen H, Sutinen J. Factors associated with the quality of life of people living with HIV in Finland. AIDS Care - Psychol Socio-Med Asp AIDSHIV. 2017;29(8):1074-1078. PubMed | Google Scholar

  21. Sianturi EI, Perwitasari DA, Islam MA, Taxis K. The association between ethnicity, stigma, beliefs about medicines and adherence in people living with HIV in a rural area in Indonesia. BMC Public Health. 2019;19(1):1-8. PubMed | Google Scholar

  22. Sianturi EI, Latifah E, Probandari A, Effendy C, Taxis K. Daily struggle to take antiretrovirals: a qualitative study in Papuans living with HIV and their healthcare providers. BMJ Open. 2020 Sep 28;10(9):e036832. PubMed | Google Scholar

  23. Tornu E, Quarcoopome L. Correlates of quality of life among persons living with tuberculosis: A cross-sectional study. PLoS One. 2022 Nov 4;17(11):e0277192. PubMed| Google Scholar

  24. Dhingra SS, Zack M, Strine T, Pearson WS, Balluz L. Determining prevalence and correlates of psychiatric treatment with Andersen´s behavioral model of health services use. Psychiatr Serv. 2010;61(5):524-528. PubMed | Google Scholar

  25. Febi AR, Manu MK, Mohapatra AK, Praharaj SK, Guddattu V. Psychological stress and health-related quality of life among tuberculosis patients: A prospective cohort study. ERJ Open Res. 2021 Aug 31;7(3):00251-2021. PubMed | Google Scholar

  26. Jermann F, Perroud N, Favre S, Aubry JM, Richard-Lepouriel H. Quality of life and subjective sleep-related measures in bipolar disorder and major depressive disorder. Qual Life Res. 2022;31(1):117-124. PubMed | Google Scholar

  27. Bar-Tur L. Fostering Well-Being in the Elderly: Translating Theories on Positive Aging to Practical Approaches. Front Med (Lausanne). 2021 Apr 9:8:517226. PubMed | Google Scholar

  28. Alford K, Daley S, Banerjee S, Vera JH. Quality of life in people living with HIV associated neurocognitive disorder: A scoping review study. PLoS One. 2021 May 19;16(5):e0251944. PubMed | Google Scholar