Home | Volume 50 | Article number 29

Research

Exploration of psychosocial and environmental factors that could improve the consumption of iron-rich foods among urban Senegalese adolescent girls

Exploration of psychosocial and environmental factors that could improve the consumption of iron-rich foods among urban Senegalese adolescent girls

Ndiaye Aminata Ndéné1,&, Galibois, Isabelle1, Blaney Sonia2

 

1Laval University, Quebec City, Quebec, G1V 0A6, Canada, 2Moncton University, Moncton, New Brunswick, E1A 3E9, Canada

 

 

&Corresponding author
Aminata Ndéné Ndiaye, Laval University, Quebec City, Quebec, G1V 0A6, Canada

 

 

Abstract

Introduction: anaemia remains a public health issue among adolescent Senegalese girls, and one cause is the low consumption of iron-rich foods. This study used the extended model of the Theory of Planned Behavior/TPB to explore psychosocial factors and environmental barriers that may influence the daily consumption of iron-rich foods/IRF among urban Senegalese adolescent girls.

 

Methods: a cross-sectional survey was conducted among 136 girls (13-18 years). Salient beliefs related to each construct of the theory were identified. Using this information, a questionnaire was developed to collect data on each construct and the intention to consume IRF daily.

 

Results: on a scale of -2 to 2, the mean score of the intention was 1.39 ± 0.74 while average scores of direct constructs were 1.60 ± 0.89 for the attitude, 1.29 ± 0.84, for the subjective norm, 0.82 ± 0.91 for the perceived behavioral control, and -0.14 ± 0.86 for the environmental barriers. Overall, 34% of girls reported that it was likely that implementing the behavior would make them gain weight while more than 80% stated that their father/mother/sisters would approve the behavior. Also, 38% of girls did not feel able to perform the behavior if they were not capable of preparing IRF themselves. Half agreed that the high price of these foods was a barrier to their consumption.

 

Conclusion: most adolescent girls intend to consume IRF. To operationalize the intention into a concrete behavior, interventions increasing self-efficacy and improving knowledge about IRF, and their affordability and accessibility could be relevant.

 

 

Introduction    Down

Anaemia is a global public health problem that affects about one-third of the world's population, with well-documented human health and economic consequences [1]. Adolescent girls in low- and middle-income countries/LMICs appear to be particularly at risk of iron deficiency anaemia due to their increased iron requirements combined with limited dietary intakes, high rates of infections and parasitic infestations, as well as the occurrence of early pregnancy [2]. Socioeconomic, behavioral, and environmental factors may also increase their vulnerability to anaemia given their influence on the consumption of iron-rich foods/IRF [1]. In Senegal, the situation of anaemia among adolescent girls has remained unchanged over the last decade, with 56% of them reported as being anaemic in 2010-2011 [3] and 57% in 2017 [4]. Similarly to most LMICs, anaemia in Senegal is mainly from the nutritional origin, resulting from a low intake of bioavailable iron [5]. Indeed, the diet of most populations in LMICs, especially those in the sub-Saharan African region, is characterized by a limited food diversity and high consumption of plant-based foods, low in bioavailable iron [6,7]. This poor diet quality is also observed in adolescents [6].

Current strategies implemented in Senegal to reduce and control iron deficiency and iron deficiency anaemia are large-scale iron/folic acid fortification of wheat flour and iron and folic acid/IFA supplementation for pregnant women. Regarding flour fortification, its contribution to micronutrient intake, especially iron, seems insufficient [8]. This is mainly due to the use of low bioavailability forms of iron, insufficient consumption, and inadequate fortification levels [9]. Concerning IFA supplementation, this strategy was initiated in 2017 in adolescent girls living in seven regions of Senegal, among which the region of Dakar. However, it should be noted that iron supplementation programs in LMICs generally face logistical and economic constraints that limit the supply and distribution of supplements and coverage of at-risk populations [10,11]. Otherwise, strategies focusing on the increase of iron intake through dietary diversification and modification among adolescent girls are scarce, although they have been associated with continued improvements in iron status among women of reproductive age and children in LMICs [12-14]. We previously documented the consumption of IRF in urban Senegalese adolescent girls [15]. Results have shown that 83% of them had a daily intake below the recommendation of 84g of animal protein foods from the EAT-Lancet Commission on healthy diets from sustainable food systems [16], which is worrisome. The diet of Senegalese girls appears to be conducive to iron deficiency, hence justifying the importance of studying factors underlying low IRF consumption to define effective interventions through diet diversification and modification to improve the situation [17].

Psychosocial theories could be of substantial assistance in understanding mechanisms underlying behavior change and identifying potential influences on eating behaviors [18-20]. Moreover, their relevance for defining effective interventions for behavior change has been demonstrated in various studies [21-23]. Some of these theories were recognized as well adapted to investigate factors associated with adolescent behaviors [24]. One of them, the Theory of Planned Behavior/TPB, has been used in several settings to study what influences adolescents` eating habits [25-28]. To get a better understanding of the range of variables to consider when acting on health behavior, Godin et al. [29] have proposed an extended model of TPB that incorporates individual and environmental elements as determinants of the intention to engage in a behavior and its actual adoption. Based on the extended TPB [30,31], this study aimed to explore individual and environmental factors that can potentially influence the daily consumption of IRF among urban Senegalese adolescent girls aged 13-18 years old. The 13-18 age group, which corresponds to college students´ ages, was targeted to facilitate study logistics. More specifically, this study sought to answer the following research questions: a) To what extent do urban Senegalese adolescent girls intend to consume IRF? b) What psychosocial factors (i.e. attitude, subjective norm, perception of behavioral control, and their respective set of beliefs) are likely to influence their daily consumption of IRF? c) What environmental factors are likely to influence their daily consumption of IRF?

 

 

Methods Up    Down

Study setting: the study was carried out in the Dakar region of Senegal, a country located in the extreme west of the African continent. Senegal covers an area of 196 722 km2 and has a wide opening onto the Atlantic Ocean with 700 kilometers of coastline [30]. In 2023, Senegal's population was estimated at 18 126 390, characterized by extreme youth (average age 19). The population density is 95 inhabitants/km2, with strong disparities between regional administrative entities. The Dakar region, home to the capital, has 4 004 426 inhabitants, or 22% of the population, and is administratively subdivided into four departments: Dakar, Pikine, Guédiawaye, and Rufisque [31]. Senegal has a high prevalence of anaemia among women of reproductive age, 52.7% in 2019 [32]. Dakar is one of the Senegalese regions with the highest prevalence of anemia: in 2011, 58.5% of women of reproductive age suffered from anaemia, compared with 54.3% at the national level [3].

Study design and target population: this was a cross-sectional survey targeting adolescent girls from two colleges in the city of Dakar, Senegal. It was part of a three-part research that also aimed at assessing the intake of IRF [15] in girls aged 13-18 years old and at defining, implementing, and assessing the impact of interventions to increase IRF intake [33]. The two colleges were selected on a purposive basis and, in each of them, all classes attended by girls aged 13-18 years were selected. In every class, all girls were invited to participate. Recruitment took place at the colleges, using the enrolment registers. In each college, the identified participants were called into a classroom where the study was presented, and where they received information about its purpose, the data to be collected, and the issues of anonymity and voluntaries. Those willing to participate were given a consent form for their parents/guardians to sign.

Study sample size: the required number of observation units was calculated using the G*power 3.1.9.2 software, considering the following parameters: statistical power of 80%; 95% accuracy; an effect size of 0.5 and a non-response rate of 5%. Thus, a sample comprising two groups of 67 adolescents each was necessary to carry out the project.

Variables

Behavior of interest: in this research, the behavior of interest was the consumption of IRF which included red meat (beef, mutton, lamb), poultry, fish, shellfish, offal, and eggs, according to the list currently used in national demographic and health surveys [4].

Theoretical framework: according to the TPB, one will adopt a behavior if she/he has the intention to perform it. In turn, the intention is determined by three constructs namely the attitude (ATT), the subjective norm (SN), and the perceived behavioral control (PBC) [34]. ATT towards a behavior refers to an individual's perception of the consequences of adopting it. The subjective norm (SN) represents the perceived social pressure to adopt a given behavior while PBC refers to the individual's evaluation of his/her ability to implement the behavior [34]. Moreover, ATT is determined by two indirect constructs: one's beliefs about outcomes of performing a behavior (or: behavioral beliefs), weighted by the evaluation of those outcomes. The subjective norm (SN) is determined by individual beliefs about whether important individuals or groups will approve or disapprove of performing a behavior (or: normative beliefs), weighted by his/her motivation to comply. PBC is also determined by two indirect constructs: control beliefs, weighted by the perceived power of each control factor to facilitate or not the behavior [35]. The extended TPB suggests that these three constructs can be influenced by external factors that include individual characteristics (e.g, gender, age, socioeconomic status, education level, etc.) and environmental characteristics (social or physical). These various external variables can also impact intention and/or behavior [29].

Data sources: the data collection was conducted from March to April 2019. A key step of this research was to develop a questionnaire to gather information on each component of the theoretical framework namely psychosocial factors (ATT, SN, PBC, and their respective related set of beliefs), some environmental factors, and the intention to consume 85g of IRF daily which was the behavior of interest in the current study. Plastic foods and real IRF representing an 85-g portion were used so that girls could visualize this serving size. The first step in the development of the questionnaire was the identification of salient beliefs associated with each of the individual constructs of the TPB model, as well as the investigation of some environmental factors that may promote or hinder the consumption of IRF. To do so, three focus group discussions (FGD) of about 60-90 minutes were held in French with ten (10) girls each. A semi-structured interview guide was used to collect information on the above components. Data on the following were gathered: a) advantages and disadvantages associated with the daily consumption of at least 85g of IRF (red meat, poultry, fish, shellfish, offal, and eggs), b) persons or groups of persons important who would approve or disapprove of their daily consumption of at least 85g of IRF, c) individual barriers and facilitators related to the daily consumption of IRF, and d) elements related to the adolescent girls' environment that could influence their daily consumption of at least 85g of IRF. For each of these questions, every individual's personal belief was listed. Thereafter, results were compiled. Beliefs expressing the same idea were grouped, and the frequency of mention of each of these beliefs under each theme was computed. Beliefs that were mentioned by at least 20% of the girls (three FGD combined, N = 30) were retained and considered as the modal salient beliefs [36].

Subsequently, salient beliefs were used to formulate items of a questionnaire in French to be administered to girls to assess each component of the theoretical framework. Five-point Likert scales (with choices of responses ranging from 'strongly disapproved' to 'strongly approved' or from 'very unlikely' to 'very likely') were used to gather their responses to each item. In addition, the questionnaire included two items to assess the intention to adopt the targeted behavior. One item was worded to capture the intent while the other was worded to focus on self-prediction, as both of these concepts have been used to measure the intention in TPB studies [29,37]. Before its administration to the study sample, the questionnaire was pre-tested among two groups of five (5) adolescent girls from one college to verify their understanding of the questions and the proposed response choices on Likert scales. The final questionnaire composed of thirty-nine (39) items, which was a self-administered tool, was then filled by each adolescent in her classroom during a school day. Data on socio-economic characteristics of adolescent households were separately collected during interviews lasting from 45 to 60 minutes held in the Wolof language at home with the head of each participating adolescent's household, using the standardized and validated Senegal Demographic and Health Surveys questionnaire [3]. Information on household composition such as the age and gender of each member, as well as their level of education, was collected. In addition, data on household food security were collected using the Household Food Insecurity Access Scale (HFIAS) which has been used in Senegal [38].

Statistical analysis: for the self-administered questionnaire, scores ranging from -2 to 2 were assigned to response options on Likert scales based on the level of disagreement/unlikelihood to agreement/likelihood towards each statement. Except for ATT which was measured by a single item of the self-administered questionnaire, for each other direct construct (SN, PBC, environment) and indirect construct (behavioral beliefs, normative beliefs, and control beliefs) of the extended TPB model, a mean score was calculated for each adolescent by averaging her related item scores. Moreover, each household was categorized as food-secure, or mildly, moderately or severely food-insecure according to the classification method of Coates et al. [38].

Sociodemographic data were grouped into categories: descriptive analyses were performed: frequency distributions, means, and standard deviations were calculated. Data were analyzed with the SPSS software (Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS), Version 21.0, Armonk, NY: IBM Corporation).

Ethics: the study was approved by the ethical committee of the National Health Research of Senegal 000106/MSAS/DPRS/CNERS and by the Research Ethics Committee of Laval University 2018-214/17-12-2018. Authorizations were also obtained from the Ministry of the National Education/School Medical Control Division, Dakar/Senegal. Written informed consent was obtained from the parent/tutor of each adolescent at the beginning of the study, and each girl also provided her written assent to participate.

 

 

Results Up    Down

Slightly more than half of adolescent girls were aged between 13 and 15 years and about 60% lived in male-headed households (Table 1). One out of two heads of household was above 50 years old, and 42% had no formal education. Half of households had more than eight members. Almost two thirds of households were food insecure. The mean score of the two items measuring adolescent girls' intention to consume at least 85g of IRF daily was 1.39 ± 0.74 out of a maximum of 2 (Table 2).

Attitude (direct construct) and behavioral beliefs: the mean score of the direct measurement of ATT was 1.60 ± 0.89 while the average score on items related to behavioral beliefs was 1.25 ± 0.64 (Table 3). More than 85% of girls responded that it was likely or very likely that consuming at least 85g of IRF daily will allow them to be in good health, to grow well, to be more concentrated at school, and to prevent anaemia, while about 75% answered that it was likely or very likely that if they implement the behavior, they will be less tired and that it will prevent pregnancy complications. Otherwise, 35% answered that it was likely or very likely that eating at least 85g of IRF daily will make them gaining weight. Mean scores for all aforementioned items were above 1.00 except that on the item related to weight gain which was 0.00 (Table 3).

Subjective norm (direct construct) and normative beliefs: the mean score of the direct measurement of the SN was 1.29 ± 0.84 while that of the indirect measurement (normative beliefs) was 1.22 ± 0.09. Overall, over 80% of girls responded that their father, mother, and sisters would slightly or strongly approve if they consumed at least 85g of IRF daily. Other groups of people were mentioned by lesser proportions (Table 3).

Perceived behavioral control (direct construct) and control beliefs: overall, the mean score of the direct measurement of the PBC construct was 0.82 ± 0.91, while that of control beliefs (indirect measurement) was 0.01 ± 1.13 (Table 3.1). About 60% of girls responded that it was likely or very likely that eating at least 85g of IRF daily would be very easy and that they felt they could do it, while about 80% responded that it was likely or very likely that if they wanted to, they could easily eat at least 85g of IRF daily, and that it was up to them to do so (Table 3.1). Regarding control beliefs, 38% of girls did not feel able to perform the behavior if they were not able to prepare IRF themselves. About 40% of girls did not feel able to perform the behavior if they were not able to prepare IRF themselves or if they thought it might lead to weight gain (Table 3.1).

Environmental barriers (direct construct): during FGD, no environmental factor that could promote IRF consumption was identified. Thus, only items relating to environmental factors that could hinder the consumption of IRF were included in the questionnaire (Table 4). The average score related to the environmental barriers was -0.14 ± 0.86, with just over half of the girls (52.2%) answered that it was likely or very likely that the high price of IRF would prevent them from consuming at least 85g daily (Table 4). Between 40% and 50% of the girls responded that it was likely or very likely that the following factors could prevent them from consuming at least 85g of IRF daily: eating with family, IRF are not cooked every day at home, IRF that taste good are not sold near school, parents/guardians do not give them enough money, IRF vendors are far from their school (Table 4).

 

 

Discussion Up    Down

The consumption of IRF appears to be limited among urban Senegalese adolescent girls [15,39]. In this paper, psychosocial and environmental factors that may influence this eating behavior were explored among girls in two colleges in Dakar, Senegal. Results will be used to define interventions that could improve their consumption of IRF. Overall, adolescent girls reported a strong intention to consume at least 85g of IRF daily. Similarly, girls` attitudes towards this eating behavior were favorable. Moreover, they perceived the SN as being supportive of the consumption of at least 85g of IRF daily. Even though the ATT of a large majority of girls appeared positive in the present study, some negative behavioral beliefs seemed to persist amongst them. Our results concur with Alami et al [40], according to whom most Iranian adolescent girls also expressed positive ATT and beliefs about the benefits of supplement use, while some of them (32%) believed that supplement use was harmful to their bodies and that nutrients should be provided through food. Although their study focused on a different behavior, similar to our context, girls participating in the aforementioned research had a positive attitude towards the increase of their nutrient intakes (either from supplements or foods) likely because of the perceived benefits for their health. In our study, while less than 10% of girls did not believe that consuming at least 85g of IRF daily would make them less tired, prevent complications of future pregnancy, or compensate for blood loss during menstruation, more than a third (34.5%) of girls perceived that consuming at least 85g of IRF daily would make them gaining weight. Likewise, in the study conducted among rural Bangladeshi adolescent girls, Lee et al. [41] mentioned that only a minority (30%) were knowledgeable about the link between anaemia and diet.

Many studies have reported that social influences, such as parents, can potentially lead to long-term changes in adolescents' eating intentions and behavior [41-43]. In our research, the SN was positive, and the adolescents´ father and mother were perceived as the people who would approve of the eating behavior to the largest extent. Other studies have also shown that adolescents place a high value on their parents' opinions, especially their mothers, about healthy eating [21-23] which is also the case for our group. The average score on the PBC was low, suggesting that adolescent girls seemed to consider themselves as having a limited ability to perform the behavior. These results contrast with those of Menozzi et al. [44], whose findings indicated a strong PBC among Italian students (mean age 22.1 ± 2.6 years) towards the consumption of vegetables. The age difference may explain the disparity in our results, as young adults may have more control than adolescents over their eating behaviors. Also, it should be noted that their study was not conducted in the same geographic and cultural context as ours. In the setting of the current study, girls appeared to have little control over their diet, eating only what their parents or guardians prepared at home or what was offered by street vendors near their school. Although some of them may be involved in preparing meals at home, the choice of what and how much to prepare does not seem to be theirs as also pointed out by Janha et al. [22] among Gambian adolescents.

In line with the aforementioned explanation, during FGD, at least 20% of girls reported that they were not able to cook IRF. This potential limitation seemed to influence their perception of control, as almost half of the girls (44.1%) did not feel able to consume at least 85g of IRF daily if they did not know how to prepare them. It is important to note that more than half of the girls (59%) were between 13 and 15 years of age and that in the Senegalese socio-cultural context, adults rather than adolescents are generally responsible for cooking for the entire family. Moreover, in our sample, the average family size was 8.2 ± 3.7, so it may not be obvious and easy for a 13-15-year-old girl to be responsible for cooking for everyone or to occupy any space in the kitchen during meal preparation. In addition, because our participants were going to school, they might be expected to spend more time on their studies than on housework.

In terms of barriers related to the environment, according to participants´ answers, the strongest limitations to consuming IRF were their high price, the fact that IRF that taste good were not sold near the school, and that girls´ parents or guardians did not give them enough money to purchase them. These results are consistent with Verstraeten et al. [45] which indicated financial accessibility and taste as major obstacles to the adoption of healthy eating behavior among Ecuadorian adolescents (10-16 years). Similarly, Banna et al. [21], reported the lack of financial resources as a barrier to the adoption of healthy eating behavior among adolescents (15-17 years old) in a peri-urban area of Lima, Peru. Lee et al. [41] also reported that adolescents were concerned that some nutrition messages, especially those related to the consumption of IRF may not be feasible to implement due to the economic constraints of their households. The affordability of IRF is likely a constraint to their access in Dakar, Senegal. Findings from a study on urban food systems, food security and nutrition in that specific setting have shown that IRF is among the most expensive foods [46]. It is therefore reasonable that adolescent girls' households may have difficulty in accessing them. Moreover, in our sample, about two out of three households were food insecure.

Multiple and interrelated factors, which reflect the environment as well as personal, social, and cultural experiences, influence eating behaviors of individuals including adolescent girls [47]. Interventions to promote healthy eating practices should thus develop strategies that simultaneously address individual, social, and environmental factors [45,48]. The assessment of factors that most likely influence a behavior in a given context is therefore warranted, so that interventions could be specifically targeted to change them. In our context, an intervention aiming at increasing the daily consumption of IRF should target and change certain beliefs about these foods that shape girls' attitudes and the perceived control over the behavior. Environmental barriers such as physical and financial accessibility should also be taken into account.

Strengths and limitations: our study has many strengths that should be highlighted. To our knowledge, this is the first research in Senegal assessing individual factors and environmental barriers that may influence adolescent girls' consumption of IRF, using a psychosocial theory to guide the study. Another strength is the development of a questionnaire that specifically aims to assess psychosocial and environmental factors that may influence IRF consumption. Although this questionnaire certainly deserves validation, it is a significant attempt to develop a tool that could be used to collect data on the psychosocial and environmental determinants of IRF consumption in this group. Finally, the limitation regarding our sampling method should be acknowledged: colleges were purposively selected and all girls attending specific classes were invited to participate. Thus, our results may not be generalized to all adolescent girls attending other colleges in the city of Dakar or rural areas.

 

 

Conclusion Up    Down

This study shows that the overall, urban Senegalese adolescent girls have the intention to consume at least 85g of IRF daily. Yet, the PBC over the behavior as well as environmental barriers appear to limit the adoption of the behavior. In particular, control beliefs persist and likely influence the PCB which, in turn, may impact the intention to adopt the behavior. Keeping that in mind, the next step could be to identify and implement socially acceptable and culturally appropriate behavior change interventions to modify underlying individual beliefs that appear to limit the consumption of IRF. Attention should also be paid to environmental barriers (e.g., financial and physical accessibility of IRF), as these also impact IRF consumption among adolescent girls. Moreover, Senegal's national data collection system could be strengthened to include indicators not only on the nutritional status of adolescent girls but also on their eating behavior and the factors underlying it. This would enable decision-makers to provide targeted responses to the specific nutritional needs of adolescent girls.

What is known about this topic

  • In Senegal, about 2 out of 3 adolescent girls are anaemic, a situation that has been stagnant in the past decade;
  • This high prevalence of anemia among adolescent girls in Senegal may be due in part to a diet low in bioavailable iron and/or a diet high in iron absorption inhibitors;
  • In Senegal, data on the factors underlying the population's eating behaviors, particularly the low consumption of IRF among adolescents, are scarce.

What this study adds

  • Most urban Senegalese adolescent girls intend to eat IRF;
  • A low perceived behavioral control, some negative behavioral beliefs, and environmental barriers such as the high price of iron-rich foods appear to limit the adoption of the behavior.

 

 

Competing interests Up    Down

The authors declare no competing interests.

 

 

Authors' contributions Up    Down

Ndiaye Aminata Ndéné, Galibois Isabelle, and Blaney Sonia. contributed to the design and implementation of the research, the analysis of the results, and the writing of the manuscript. All the authors have read and agreed to the final version of the manuscript.

 

 

Acknowledgments Up    Down

We would like to thank all adolescent girls for their participation in this study. We are also grateful to the survey team, the directors of the two colleges as well as the representative of the Ministry of Education of the Dakar Region, Senegal for their continuous and significant support. We would like to thank Pr Mohamadou Sall, Director of the IPDSR at the University Cheikh Anta Diop, and Dr Aliou Abdourahmane Dia, Head of the School Medical Control Division, for their outstanding support and contribution to the implementation of this research. Financial support of the Queen Elizabeth scholarship program funded by the International Development Research Center and the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada is acknowledged.

 

 

Tables Up    Down

Table 1: characteristics of adolescent girls and their households (N = 136)

Table 2: distributions (%) of girls on a five-response scale and mean scores (± standard deviation / SD) of their intention to consume at least 85 g of iron-rich foods per day (N = 136)

Table 3: distributions (%) of adolescent girls by item on a five-response scale and mean scores (± standard deviation/ SD) on direct and indirect constructs underlying the intention to consume at least 85 g of iron-rich foods per day (N=136): attitude and subjective norm

Table 3.1: distributions (%) of adolescent girls by item on a five-response scale and mean scores (± standard deviation/ SD) on direct and indirect constructs underlying the intention to consume at least 85 g of iron-rich foods per day (N=136): perceived behavioral control

Table 4: distributions (%) of girls on a five-response scale and mean scores (± standard deviation/ SD) on environment-related barriers to the consumption of at least 85 g of iron-rich foods per day (N = 136)

 

 

References Up    Down

  1. World Health Organization. Nutritional anaemias: tools for effective prevention and control. 2017. Accessed April 11, 2018.

  2. Meier PR, Nickerson HJ, Olson KA, Berg RL, Meyer JA. Prevention of iron deficiency anemia in adolescent and adult pregnancies. Clin Med Res. 2003 Jan;1(1):29-36. PubMed | Google Scholar

  3. Agence Nationale de la Statistique et de la Démographie, ICF. Enquête Démographique et de Santé à Indicateurs Multiples au Sénégal (EDS-MICS) 2010-2011. Calverton, Maryland, USA: ANSD et ICF International. 2012. Accessed April 11, 2018.

  4. Agence Nationale de la Statistique et de la Démographie, ICF. Enquête Démographique et de Santé Continue (EDS-Continue 2016). Rockville, Maryland, USA: ANSD et ICF. 2018. Accessed February 27, 2020.

  5. Camaschella C. Iron deficiency. Blood. 2019;133(1):30-39. PubMed | Google Scholar

  6. Ochola S, Masibo PK. Dietary intake of schoolchildren and adolescents in developing countries. Ann Nutr Metab. 2014;64 Suppl 2:24-40. PubMed | Google Scholar

  7. Dia S. Impact d´une intervention alimentaire sur le statut en fer d´un groupe d´orphelins et enfants vulnérables d´âge préscolaire du Burkina Faso. PhD. Thesis, Quebec, Quebec: Université Laval. 2008.

  8. Programme alimentaire mondial, Nutrition International. Fortification du riz au Sénégal - Analyse de la situation 2019-Senegal. Relief Web. 2019. Accessed March 28, 2022.

  9. Geneva: World Health Organization, Food and Agricultural Organization of the United Nations. Guidelines on food fortification with micronutrients. 2006. Accessed December 2, 2021.

  10. Mora JO. Iron supplementation: overcoming technical and practical barriers. J Nutr. 2002 Apr;132(4 Suppl):853S-5S. PubMed | Google Scholar

  11. Wendt AS, Stephenson R, Young MF, Verma P, Srikantiah S, Webb-Girard A et al. Identifying bottlenecks in the iron and folic acid supply chain in Bihar, India: a mixed-methods study. BMC Health Serv Res. 2018;18(1):281. PubMed | Google Scholar

  12. Grillenberger M, Murphy SP, Neumann CG, Bwibo NO, Verhoef H, Hautvast JGAJ. The potential of increased meat intake to improve iron nutrition in rural Kenyan schoolchildren. Int J Vitam Nutr Res. 2007;77(3):193-198. PubMed | Google Scholar

  13. Patterson AJ, Brown WJ, Roberts DC, Seldon MR. Dietary treatment of iron deficiency in women of childbearing age. Am J Clin Nutr. 2001;74(5):650-656. PubMed | Google Scholar

  14. Rao S, Joshi S, Bhide P, Puranik B, Asawari K. Dietary diversification for prevention of anaemia among women of childbearing age from rural India. Public Health Nutr. 2014;17(4):939-947. PubMed | Google Scholar

  15. Ndiaye AN, Galibois I, Blaney S. Iron-rich foods intakes among urban Senegalese adolescent girls. Int J Child Health Nutr. 2021;10(1):1-8. Google Scholar

  16. Willett W, Rockström J, Loken B, Springmann M, Lang T, Vermeulen S et al. Food in the Anthropocene: the EAT-Lancet Commission on healthy diets from sustainable food systems. The Lancet. 2019;393(10170):447-492. PubMed | Google Scholar

  17. Story M, Neumark-Sztainer D, French S. Individual and environmental influences on adolescent eating behaviors. J Am Diet Assoc. 2002 Mar;102(3 Suppl):S40-51. PubMed | Google Scholar

  18. Bartholomew LK, Parcel GS, Kok G, Gottlieb NH, Fernández ME. Planning health promotion programs: An intervention mapping approach. Hoboken, NJ; Jossey-Bass/Wiley. 2011:1-48. Google Scholar

  19. Michie S, Prestwich A. Are interventions theory-based? Development of a theory coding scheme. Health Psychol. 2010;29(1):1-8. PubMed | Google Scholar

  20. Glanz K, Bishop DB. The role of behavioral science theory in development and implementation of public health interventions. Annu Rev Public Health. 2010;31:399-418. PubMed | Google Scholar

  21. Banna JC, Buchthal OV, Delormier T, Creed-Kanashiro HM, Penny ME. Influences on eating: a qualitative study of adolescents in a peri urban area in Lima, Peru. BMC Public Health. 2015;40:16.40. PubMed | Google Scholar

  22. Janha R, Hardy-Johnson P, Kehoe S, Mendy M, Carama I, Jarjou L et al. Exploring influences on adolescent diet and physical activity in rural Gambia, West Africa: Food insecurity, culture and the natural environment. Public Health Nutr. 2020;24(16):5277-5287. PubMed | Google Scholar

  23. Sogari G, Velez-Argumedo C, Gómez M, Mora C. College Students and Eating Habits: A study using an ecological model for healthy behavior. Nutrients. 2018;10(12):1823. PubMed | Google Scholar

  24. World Health Organization. Nutrition in adolescence - Issues and Challenges for the Health Sector. 2005. Accessed October 15, 2021.

  25. Chan K, Tsang L. Promote healthy eating among adolescents: A Hong Kong study. Journal of Consumer Marketing. 2011 Aug 2;28(5):354-62. Google Scholar

  26. Fila SA, Smith C. Applying the theory of planned behavior to healthy eating behaviors in urban Native American youth. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2006 May 30;3:11. PubMed | Google Scholar

  27. Grønhøj A, Bech-Larsen T, Chan K, Tsang L. Using theory of planned behavior to predict healthy eating among Danish adolescents. 2012 Dec 28;113(1):4-17. Google Scholar

  28. Zeinab J, Gholamreza G, Mehdi Y, Mahmood T, Korush J. Factors related to reduction in the consumption of fast food: application of the theory-based approaches. J Public Health Res. 2017;6(2):832. PubMed | Google Scholar

  29. Godin G. Les comportements dans le domaine de la santé?: Comprendre pour mieux intervenir. Montréal, Québec: Presses de l´Université de Montréal. 2013 Mar 1. Google Scholar

  30. ANSD, ICF. Enquête Démographique et de Santé Continue (EDS-Continue 2019). Rockville, Maryland, USA: ANSD et ICF. 2019.

  31. Agence Nationale de la Statistique et de la Démographie (ANSD) du Sénégal. Données de population. 2024. Accessed July 15, 2024.

  32. WHO. Anaemia in women and children. 2021. Accessed May 20, 2023.

  33. Ndiaye AN, Isabelle G, Sonia B. Impact of Participative Nutrition Interventions on Iron-Rich Food Consumption in Urban Senegalese Adolescent Girls. Nov Tech Nutri Food Sci. 2024;7(5):000674.

  34. Ajzen I. The theory of planned behavior. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process. 1991;50(2):179-211. Google Scholar

  35. Montano DE, Kasprzyk D. Theory of reasoned action, theory of planned behavior, and the integrated behavioral model. Health behavior: Theory, research and practice. 2015 Jul 1;70(4):231. Google Scholar

  36. Ajzen I. Understanding attitudes and predictiing social behavior. Englewood cliffs. 1980. Google Scholar

  37. Gagné C, Godin G. Les théories sociales cognitives: guide pour la mesure des variables et le développement de questionnaire. Groupe de recherche sur les aspects psychosociaux de la santé, Québec, Québec: École de sciences infirmières de l'Université Laval. 1999:1-73.

  38. Coates J, Swindale A, Bilinsky P. Household Food Insecurity Access Scale (HFIAS) for measurement of food access: indicator guide: version 3. 2007;3:1-36. Google Scholar

  39. Giguère-Johnson M, Ward S, Ndéné Ndiaye A, Galibois I, Blaney S. Dietary intake and food behaviours of Senegalese adolescent girls. BMC Nutr. 2021;7(1):41. PubMed | Google Scholar

  40. Alami A, Tavakoly Sany S, Lael-Monfared E, Ferns G, Tatari M, Hosseini Z et al. Factors that influence dietary behavior toward iron and vitamin D consumption based on the theory of planned behavior in Iranian adolescent girls. Nutr J. 2019 Feb 6;18(1):8. PubMed | Google Scholar

  41. Lee J, Pelto GH, Habicht JP, Bhuiyan M, S Jalal C. Identifying nutrition and health-relevant behaviors, beliefs, and values of school-going adolescent girls in rural Bangladesh: Context for interventions. Curr Dev Nutr. 2019;3(5):1-10. PubMed | Google Scholar

  42. Ajzen I. The theory of planned behaviour is alive and well, and not ready to retire: a commentary on Sniehotta, Presseau, and Araújo-Soares. Health Psychol Rev. 2015;9(2):131-137. PubMed | Google Scholar

  43. Guillaumie L, Godin G, Vézina-Im LA. Psychosocial determinants of fruit and vegetable intake in adult population: a systematic review. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2010;7:12. PubMed | Google Scholar

  44. Menozzi D, Sogari G, Mora C. Explaining vegetable consumption among young adults: an application of the theory of planned behaviour. Nutrients. 2015;7(9):7633-7650. PubMed | Google Scholar

  45. Verstraeten R, Leroy JL, Pieniak Z, Ochoa-Avilès A, Holdsworth M, Verbeke W et al. Individual and environmental factors influencing adolescents´ dietary behavior in Low- and Middle-Income settings. PLOS ONE. 2016;11(7): e0157744. PubMed | Google Scholar

  46. Marra S, Salmivaara M, Bendech M, Seki R. Urban food systems, food security and nutrition in Dakar, Senegal. Dakar, The Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. 2016. Google Scholar

  47. Bisogni C, Jastran M, Seligson M, Thompson A. How people interpret healthy eating: Contributions of qualitative research. J Nutr Educ Behav. 2012 Jul-Aug;44(4):282-301. PubMed | Google Scholar

  48. Verstraeten R, Roberfroid D, Lachat C, Leroy JL, Holdsworth M, Maes L et al. Effectiveness of preventive school-based obesity interventions in low- and middle-income countries: A systematic review. Am J Clin Nutr. 2012;96(2):415-438. PubMed | Google Scholar