Home | Volume 45 | Article number 41

Research

Prevalence of multidrug-resistant and extensively drug-resistant phenotypes of Gram-negative bacilli isolated in clinical specimens at Centre Hospitalo-Universitaire Ibn Rochd, Morocco

Prevalence of multidrug-resistant and extensively drug-resistant phenotypes of Gram-negative bacilli isolated in clinical specimens at Centre Hospitalo-Universitaire Ibn Rochd, Morocco

Imane Zalegh1,&, Laila Chaoui1, Fakhreddine Maaloum2, Khalid Zerouali2, Rajaa Ait Mhand1

 

1Research Unit Microbiology, Biomolecules and Biotechnology, Laboratory of Chemistry-Physics and Biotechnologies of Biomolecules and Materials, Faculty of Sciences and Technologies (FST), Mohammedia Hassan II University of Casablanca, Casablanca, Morocco, 2Laboratory of Microbiology, Centre Hospitalo-Universitaire (CHU) Ibn Rochd, Casablanca, Morocco

 

 

&Corresponding author
Imane Zalegh, Research Unit Microbiology, Biomolecules and Biotechnology, Laboratory of Chemistry-Physics and Biotechnologies of Biomolecules and Materials, Faculty of Sciences and Technologies (FST), Mohammedia Hassan II University of Casablanca, Casablanca, Morocco

 

 

Abstract

Introduction: antimicrobial resistance in gram-negative bacilli is one of the major concerns in public health. We aimed to evaluate gram-negative bacilli epidemiology, antimicrobial profiles, and the resistance´s mechanism for Enterobacteriaceae isolated from specimens of hospitalized patients in wards of University Hospital Center Ibn Rochd of Casablanca, Morocco.

 

Methods: a prospective study of the patient's specimens, collected from December 2016 to 31st March 2017. Isolation and identification were performed using conventional biochemical tests. According to the European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing guidelines, antibiotic susceptibility was determined. Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) was used to detect β-lactamase and carabapenemase genes: CTX-M, SHV, TEM, OXA-48, NDM, and VIM among the Enterobacteriaceae.

 

Results: according to inclusion criteria, 38 Enterobacteriaceae, 25 Acinetobacter baumannii (A. baumannii), and 10 Pseudomonas aeruginosa (P. aeruginosa) were included during the study period; these bacteria were mainly responsible for bacteremia. Fifty-five percent of enterobacteria were extended-spectrum β-lactamase (ESBL), 42% EBSL and carbapenemase, and 3% carbapenemase, with high coresistances. Eighty-four percent of A. baumannii were XDR. All P. aeruginosa were MDR; amikacin showed the best activity (70% susceptibility). The genotypic approach revealed the presence of blaCTX-M, blaSHV, blaTEM in 68%, 22%, and 11% respectively. Of the 22 carbapenemase-producers, 41% were blaOXA-48 and 18% blaNDM; none had blaVIM. Furthermore, various genes coexistence were detected: blaCTX-M+blaOXA-48; blaCTX-M+blaNDM; blaCTX-M+blaSHV+blaOXA-48; and blaSHV+blaOXA-48.

 

Conclusion: findings revealed highly resistance rate among isolates. This raises the need to control antibiotics and regular screening to identify dynamics promoting resistance. Thus, we recommend developing antimicrobial stewardship programs and improving hygiene systems to prevent the nosocomial spreading of these phenotypes in our center.

 

 

Introduction    Down

Bacteria are one of the primary sources of infectious diseases in humans. Nowadays, gram-negative bacilli, including Enterobacteriaceae, Acinetobacter baumannii (A. baumannii), and Pseudomonas aeruginosa (P. aeruginosa), have been identified as the primary cause of infections. Therefore, these pathogens are becoming challenging in developing and developed countries significantly among hospitalized and non-hospitalized patients. Furthermore, they are increasingly isolated in different hospital wards from respiratory tract infections, urinary tract infections, intra-abdominal infections, septic, post-surgical infections, and pneumonia, a severe menace, especially in critically ill patients [1,2].

The injudicious misuse and accessibility of antibiotics have led to the emergence of antimicrobial-resistant strains to commonly prescribed antibiotics, a significant challenge in medical practice. Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) in this group has been recognized by World Health Organization (WHO) as a threat to the public health [3]. Studies conducted in Morocco have reported the alarming rate of β-lactamase and carbapenemase-producing bacterial pathogens and the increasing prevalence of resistance to other antibiotics classes [4,5]. This problem is crucial in fermenting and non-fermenting bacteria because of their ubiquity and ability to acquire genes that confer resistance to other antibiotics classes. This situation is associated with therapeutic impasses leading to high morbidity and mortality rates and an extended hospital stays. It has been predicted that if appropriate control and prevention measures are not taken, in 2050, AMR would be responsible for a death every 3 seconds [6]. Accordingly, in the current study, we established the period prevalence and antimicrobial sensitivity profile of the following phenotypes ESBL and carbapenemase-producing of the main pathogenic bacteria Enterobacteriaceae, A. baumannii P. aeruginosa imipenem resistants. Then we detected the presence of β-lactamase and carbapenemase encoding genes: blaCTX-M, blaSHV, blaTEM, blaOXA-48, blaNDM, and blaVIM among the Enterobacteriaceae isolated from various clinical specimens from hospitalized patients at University Hospital Center, Ibn Rochd of Casablanca, Morocco.

 

 

Methods Up    Down

Study design: this is a descriptive cross-sectional study, conducted between December 2016 and March 2017 in University Hospital Center Ibn Rochd of Casablanca, Morocco. Data was taken from the computerized database of the Microbiology Laboratory. The inclusion criteria were Enterobacteriaceae ESBL and/or carbapenemase-producing, A. baumannii, and P. aeruginosa imipenem resistant.

Study population: the study concerned all services of University Hospital Center Ibn Rochd of Casablanca, Morocco. It´s a tertiary hospital covering the entire region of Grand Casablanca. Isolated were recovered from urine, pus and wound swab, pleural fluid endotracheal tubes, and blood from patients hospitalized in different hospital wards. Data about patients were composed of age, gender, hospitalized ward, bacteria isolated, and type of clinical specimen.

Isolate collection and identification: during the study period, 851 clinical isolates were recovered from different samples received. Two hundred and sixty MDR were identified; among them, 73 non-duplicated strains were included in this cross-sectional study. Isolates were identified based on conventional biochemical tests. In brief, specimens were inoculated to MacConkey agar plate and incubated at 37°C for 18h to 24h. Microscopical examination of gram-stained smears confirmed identity. Bacterial colonies were subjected to conventional biochemical tests, including oxidase, catalase, API 20E, and API 20NE (BioMérieux®).

Antimicrobial sensitivity testing and ESBL production: the antimicrobial susceptibility profile of isolates was determined using the disc diffusion method, and the results were interpreted according to the European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST) guidelines [7]. The following antibiotics were used; ampicillin (AMP) (10 μg), amoxicillin/clavulanic acid (AMC) (20/10 μg), piperacillin/tazobactam (PTZ) (30/6 μg), cefepime (CPM) (30 μg), cefotaxime (CTX) (5 μg), ceftazidime (CAZ) (10 μg), ceftriaxone (CRO) (30 μg), meropenem (MEM) (10 μg), ertapenem (ETP) (10 μg), imipenem (IMP) (10 μg), gentamicin (GM) (30 μg), ciprofloxacin (CIP) (5 μg), levofloxacin (LEV) (5 μg), amikacin (AK) (30 μg), tobramycin (TN) (10 μg), netilmicin (NET) (10 μg), fosfomycin (FOS) (200 μg), trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole (TSU) (1.25/23.75 μg), chloramphenicol (CHL) (30 μg) (Oxoid Ltd, Basingstoke, UK).

All Enterobacteriaceae isolates with an inhibition diameter ≤ to 22 mm with CAZ and ≤ to 27 mm with CTX were subjected to the ESBL confirmatory test using the double-disc synergy [8]. In addition, Escherichia coli ATCC 25922 and P. aeruginosa ATCC 27953 were used as quality control for media and antibiotics performance.

The definition of Magiorakos et al. [9] was used to classify bacterial isolates into MDR, extensively drug-resistant XDR, and pan drug-resistant pandrig resistance (PDR). MDR=resistant to at least one agent in three or more antimicrobial classes, XDR= susceptible to two or fewer antimicrobial classes, and PDR=resistant to all antimicrobial agents in all antimicrobial classes.

Preparation of deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) and PCR: polymerase chain reaction technique was used to target the blaCTX-M [10], blaSHV [11], blaTEM [12], blaOXA-48 [13], blaNDM [14], and blaVIM [14] among all Enterobacteriaceae ESBL and carbapenemase-producing included. All Enterobacteriaceae ESBL and carbapenemase-producing were grown on Mueller-Hinton (MH) agar plates (Bio-Rad®) for 18-24 hours at 37°C. Bacterial cells were suspended in 400 μL of ultrapure water. The suspension was heated at 100°C for 10 minutes and immediately frozen at 0°C for 5 minutes. One hundred and eighty μL were then recovered after centrifugation of 12000 g for 10 min. The supernatant containing DNA was stored at -20°C until further use.

Extended-spectrum β-lactamase (ESBL)-producing isolates were screened by PCR simplex for the following β-lactamase-encoding genes: blaCTX-M, blaSHV, and blaTEM as described by [12]. Also screened by PCR for the following carbapenemase-encoding genes: blaOXA-48, blaNDM, and blaVIM as described by [13] with slight modifications. The primers used for PCR are listed in Table 1.

For blaCTX-M, blaSHV, and blaTEM amplification mixture were performed in volume of 23.5 μL containing: 2.5 μL of MgCl2 (2.5 mM), 5 μL of buffer, 0.5 μL of each forward and reverse primers (0.2 μM), 0.5 μL of deoxynucleoside triphosphate (dNTP) (0.2 mM), 14.3 μL of double-distilled water (ddH2O), and 0.2 μL (1 unit) of Taq DNA polymerase. Then we added 1.5 μL of the bacterial DNA for each simplex PCR.

For blaOXA-48 amplification mixture was performed in volume of 22 μL containing: 2.5 μL of MgCl2 (2.5 mM), 5 μL of buffer, 0.5 μL of each forward and reverse primers (0.2 μM), 0.5 μL of dNTP (0.2 mM), 12.8 μL of ddH2O, and 0.2 μL (1 unit) of Taq DNA polymerase. Then we added 3 μL of the bacterial DNA. Amplification reactions for blaNDM and blaVIM were performed in a volume of 22 μL containing: 2.5 μL of MgCl2 (2.5 mM), 5 μL of buffer, 1 μL of each forward and reverse primers (0.2 μM), 2 μL of dNTP (0.2 mM), 10.3 μL of ddH2O, and 0.2 L (1 unit) of Taq DNA polymerase. Then we added 3 μL of the bacterial DNA. Amplicons were visualized after running at 120V for 30 min on a 0.5% agarose gel containing ethidium bromide (0.5 μg/mL), using photographed ultraviolet (UV) transilluminator and analyzed compared with the positive control of each resistance gene and DNA Ladder 100 bp (Promega®).

Data analysis and interpretation: the data was collected and entered into Microsoft Excel 16.59. The frequency and percentages of MDR, carbapenemase, and ESBL-producing gram-negative bacteria were calculated using SPSS®-26. Tables were used for data presentation.

Ethical considerations: in order to ensure the confidentiality of patient´s personal information, data of isolates recovered during the diagnosis routine were collected and anonymity was maintained. So, no personal information of patients was taken into consideration in this study.

 

 

Results Up    Down

Demographic characteristics of patients with bacterial infections: out of 851 different clinical cultures were submitted to the laboratory during the specified period. Of these isolates, 626 (73.5%) Enterobacteriaceae, 101 (11.9%) A. baumannii, 124 (14.6%) P. aeruginosa. Among the enterobacteria isolated, 147 (24%) were multi-resistant. For gram-negative non-fermentative bacteria, 88 (87%) and 25 (20%) were Imipenem resistant for A. baumannii and P. aeruginosa, respectively. According to our inclusion criteria, 38 (52%) enterobacteria, 25 (34%) A. baumannii imipenem resistant, and 10 (14%) P. aeruginosa imipenem resistant was included. The distribution of 73 isolates according to specimen types showed the highest proportion of isolates, were from blood 24/73 (33%), followed by urine 14/73 (19%), 9/73 (12%) rectal swabs, 9/73 (12%) pus, 9/73 (12%) medical devices, 7/73 (9%) clinical respiratory specimens, and 1/73 (1%) from body fluid (Table 2). The number of isolates was distributed in the wards as follows; haematology: 18/73 (25%), neonatology: 18/73 (24%), intensive care unit (ICU): 16/73 (20%), burned centre 4/73 (5%), urology: 4/73 (5%), visceral surgery: 1/73 (1%), endocrinology and metabolic diseases: 2/73 (3%), day hospital collecting centre: 2/73 (3%), medical pediatrics: 2/73 (3%), orthopedic-trauma centre: 2/73 (3%), physical medicine and functional rehabilitation 1/73 (1%), hepato-gastro-enterology and proctology: 1/73 (1%), infectious diseases: 1/73 (1%), and dermatology: 1/73 (1%) (Table 2).

The patient's ages ranged between 1 day to 65 years, and the median age was 24.5 years old, with a gender distribution of 38/73 (52%) females and 35/73 (48%) males. The prevalence of infections was highest among patients of age-group 21-50 years 32/73 (44%) followed by < 2 months 17/73 (23%), < 20 years 11/73 (15%), and least 51-65 years 7/73 (10%). Data were not available for 6 patients. Bacteremia infections and respiratory tract infection (RTI) were highest in newborns and patients under 20 years old. In contrast, urinary tract infection (UTI) was predominant in patients aged 21-50 (Table 3).

Bacteriological data: for enterobacteria isolates, E. coli was the predominant (50%) 19/38, and Klebsiella pneumoniae was the second predominant (31.6%) 12/38, and then Enterobacter cloacae (10.5%) 4/38, Klebsiella oxytoca (2.6%) 1/38, Raoutella terrigena (2.6%) 1/38, Enterobacter aerogenes (2.6%) 1/38.

Antimicrobial susceptibility profile: the resistance rates of 73 isolates were very high to most antimicrobials tested (Table 4). Of the 38 MDR isolates, 37/38 (97%) were ESBL-producers, 21/38 (55%) were ESBL/carbapenemase producers, and 1/38 (3%) carbapenemase producers. All enterobacteria (100%) were resistant to 4 antibiotics from three antibiotic classes. Most isolates (more than 90%) were resistant to amoxicillin clavulanic acid, cefepime, and ceftriaxone. In addition, a substantial level of resistance to quinolones and aminoglycosides was observed. In contrast, the lowest resistance rate was observed in gentamicin (29%). Regarding A. baumannii, the resistance rates were remarkably higher for all antibiotics tested; 84% of strains were XDR. Imipenem, meropenem, ciprofloxacin, levofloxacin, gentamicin, and tobramycin (100%); amikacin, netilmicin, and trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole (more than 80%). All of P. aeruginosa were MDR and showed a high level of resistance to piperacillin/tazobactam and gentamicin (60% and 50% respectively), cefepime (70%), levofloxacin (80%), netilmicin, and tobramycin (100%). However, amikacin was the most active; the resistance level was 30%. The prevalence of resistance against the tested antibiotics is presented in Table 4.

Molecular resistance analysis of Enterobacteriaceae isolates: after amplifying the target genes, PCR showed that all isolates harbored genetic support of the resistance. Of the 37 ESBL-producer, blaCTX-M were the mainly detected gene (65% 25/37), eight strains harbored blaSHV (22%; 8/37) and (11%; 4/37) carried blaTEM. Of the 22 carbapenemase-producers, 9 were positive to blaOXA-48, 4 for blaNDM, VIM gene was not detected in any of our isolates. Furthermore, the coexistence of blaCTX-M with blaOXA-48 and blaCTX-M with blaNDM was detected in 2 strains, the coexistence of blaCTX-M with blaSHV and blaOXA-48 was detected in one strain, 4 strains harbored blaSHV with blaOXA-48. Of the 9 cases positive to blaOXA-48, six have been reported in an isolate of K. pneumoniae, two in E. coli and one of E. cloacae. This distribution of the mentioned genes among the enterobacteria species is shown in Table 5.

 

 

Discussion Up    Down

Due to the overuse of antibiotics, invasive procedures, and devices expose patients to a high risk of comorbidity and mortality. Therefore, in developing countries such as Morocco, investigating and controlling bacterial infections' epidemiology and resistance patterns is critical, especially in hospitals, for clinicians and decision-makers on health to implement adequate measures and effective management of these diseases [15].

In the current primary descriptive study, we examined the epidemiological spectrum by evaluating the antimicrobial patterns of the gram-negative bacilli clinical isolates of patients hospitalized in various wards of University Hospital Center Ibn Rochd of Casablanca, Morocco. Our study revealed that the most common culture-positive clinical samples were blood followed by urines. Similar findings were obtained in several studies [16,17]. However, in the investigations carried out by Beyene et al. and Mirzaei et al. urinary infections were the predominant, followed by bacteremia [18,19]. It is important to note that our study's demographics data showed that bacteremia and respiratory tract infections affect mainly infant patients <2 months old due to their lack of fully developed immune status. This result differs from published Moroccan and international epidemiology, ranging from 20 to 67 years old [20,21]. The detected difference could be due to the brief period of study, the diversity of specimen type, and specimen size. In the specified period, 38 Enterobacteriaceae MDR were isolated, E. coli and K. pneumoniae were the most frequent species, mainly in bacteremia and urinary tract infections. Studies have shown the prevalence of these micro-organisms in these infections in Iran, Brazil, and Nigeria [17,22,23].

On the other hand, non-fermenting gram-negative bacilli are represented essentially with A. baumannii and P. aeruginosa plays a key role in nosocomial infections. At the same time, they were only considered to be contaminants in the past. Our study isolation rate of A. baumannii and P. aeruginosa imipenem resistant was 34% and 14%, respectively, parallel to those reported in the literature [19,20]. In this study, A. baumannii was isolated mainly from blood cultures and medical equipment, from ICU, especially neonatology which is the most alarming. This finding is in agreement with many reports [17,20,21,24,25]. According to a study conducted in the United Kingdom, Acinetobacter spp stains causing bacteremia have increased between 1998 and 2005 from 2 to 18 per 100,000 hospital days [26]. Our study observed a higher incidence of isolates from ICU (47%). Several risk factors account for the high ICU infections. These first ICU houses critically ill patients who are often exposed to extensive use of antibiotics, causing selection pressure for the emergence of resistance. These factors coupled with interventional instrumentations such as mechanical ventilation and invasive procedures commonly used expose the patients to a high risk of infections.

Antimicrobial resistance has become a global pandemic that threatens every individual's health, economic and social well-being. The current prioritized lists of bacterial pathogens by the World Health Organization and the Infectious Diseases Society of America categorized E. coli, E. cloacae, K. pneumoniae, A. baumannii, and P. aeruginosa have further been described as gram-negative Enterococcus faecium, Staphylococcus aureus, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Acinetobacter baumannii, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Enterobacter species (ESKAPE) as critical or most life-threatening gram-negative pathogens [27].

The susceptibility profile of the isolates displayed a high level of multi-drug resistance against the first-line drug such as penicillin, cephalosporin, fluoroquinolones due to the unrestricted use by physicians, in addition, to their purchasing ease without prescription in the community pharmacies. Furthermore, isolates showed a high rate of resistance to carbapenem. The antibiotic resistance pattern of Enterobacteriaceae showed 100% of resistance to ampicillin, tobramycin, netilmicin, and chloramphenicol; more than 80% of the strains were resistant to amoxicillin/clavulanic acid, cefepime, cefotaxime, ceftriaxone, and trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole, which is similar to previous studies [18,22]. Likewise, high-rate resistance against piperacillin/tazobactam (63%), ertapenem (61%), and ciprofloxacin (76%) was observed; this may be due to the coexistence of other mechanisms of resistances as inactivating enzymes like β-lactamases, carbapenemases, and aminoglycosidases. The widespread of these bacterial profiles in Morocco is a common trend in hospitals [20,28], community [29], and even the environment [30]. However, fosfomycin (for E. coli), amikacin, and gentamicin were the most active antibiotics. The resistance to aminoglycosides is usually attributable to enzymes modification, such as amino-glycoside 6´-N-acetyltransferases of type Ib (AAC (6')-Ib). This enzyme can modify amikacin, tobramycin, kanamycin, and netilmicin but not gentamicin. Numerous studies reported the existence of the aac(6)-Ib gene and susceptibility to amikacin and gentamicin [31].

Resistance to antibiotics tested in A. baumannii in the current study reached very alarming levels and were screened as follow: imipenem (100%), meropenem (100%), ciprofloxacin (100%), levofloxacin (100%), gentamicin (100%), and tobramycin (100%). In addition, up to 96%, 88%, and 84% of isolates were resistant to amikacin, netilmicin, and trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole. The infective of carbapenems, even if they're used as a last resort, poses a challenge. The results present similarity with increasing rates of resistance of A. baumannii around the world, in Iran [19], Nepal [32], and Morocco [20,25], Although this rate seems to increase since 2007 in Moroccan hospitals. Indeed, Lahsoune et al. reported a resistance rate of 17.9% and 35% to netilmicin and amikacin [33]. In 2016, Uwingabiye et al. reported that resistance to the same antibiotic increased to reach 33% and 52% [34]. Overall, the variation in antibiotic resistance proportion may be due to many parameters such as geographical difference, study period, and ward origin.

In addition, the overall resistance of P. aeruginosa against aminoglycoside, cephalosporin, and fluoroquinolones was alarming, for netilmicin (100%), tobramycin (100%), cefepime (70%), levofloxacin (80%), and ciprofloxacin (60%). However, it was observed that amikacin and meropenem's resistance rate by these isolates was not that high. Amikacin and Meropenem have been reported to effectively treat diseases caused by P. aeruginosa [35]. In a study conducted at the Children's Hospital of Tehran between 2013 and 2018, showed that the sensitivity of P. aeruginosa has increased from 50% to 76% [17]. Therefore, the susceptibility of amikacin may be due to its use as a last resort in treating severe infections.

In general, the international literature reports that the resistance to extended-spectrum β-lactams in Enterobacteriaceae is mainly mediated via the production of blaCTX-M and to a lesser degree via blaSHV [36]. In most local studies, carbapenem resistance in Enterobacteriaceae is often mediated by the production of OXA-48 and NDM carbapenemases. Therefore, this outspread of the OXA-48 enzyme could be endemic for several Mediterranean countries, such as Morocco's case [37-39]. This increasing emergence is a severe epidemiological risk, as it is well known that plasmid-mediated transfer of drug-resistance genes is considered to be one of the most essential mechanisms driving their spread. Also, the strains that carried such genes cause nosocomial infections and outbreaks with a high mortality range. Thus, available choices for appropriate treatments for infections are very limited and that´s why the lack of their detection may enhance their hidden. Thus, it is essential to conduct molecular genetic analyses as well as to characterize the β-lactamase and carbapenemase found in specific geographic areas to outcome of the molecular evolution of both genes and resistant clones.

Limitations: our investigation´s main limitations were, first of all, the short duration of the study period, which led to a small sample size also related to inclusion criteria. Secondly, it is a single-centered study. However, the scope of this study was to investigate the resistance pattern and prevalence of MDR and XDR among the studied groups of pathogens in our hospital. We would also have wished to detect the genes coding carbapenemase for A. baumannii and P. aeruginosa.

 

 

Conclusion Up    Down

Gram-negative bacteria are one of the leading causes of significant antibiotic resistance. The Enterobacteriaceae, A. baumannii and P. aeruginosa isolated during this study were implicated in various infections. The bacteremia was the most frequently diagnosed, also notably, the infections were common among infants. Our results confirm, on the one hand, the international trend of increasing multi-drug resistance among gram-negative bacilli. Withing the Enterobacteriaceae, 55% were ESBL, 42% were ESBL and carbapenemase producing, while 3% were carbapenemase, in addition to the coexistence profile to the several antibiotic classes. Regarding nonfermenting gram-negative bacilli, 84% of A. baumannii were extensively drug-resistant, while all P. aeruginosa were MDR. On the other hand, the study underlines the local spread of blaCTX-M, blaOXA-48, and blaNDM. Nevertheless, the spread of these genes in our isolates, with the coexistence of genes mediated resistance, could be further than expected and lead to a management impasse. Given that antibiotic resistance can cause severe infections in hospitalized patients and lead to a therapeutic dilemma, these findings highlight the need for timely, accurate epidemiological and susceptibility information to guide the identification and implementation of strict antimicrobial stewardship policies and good microbiological surveillance procedures in the hospitals.

What is known about this topic

  • The increasing antibiotic-resistant infections area worldwide dilemma, which is a significant cause of mortality and morbidity;
  • The spreading of drug resistance among bacteria is affected by many parameters and may differ in different parts of the world;
  • In lower-middle-income countries, resistance rates are high.

What this study adds

  • This study is showing a recent resistance and epidemiological profile among gram-negative isolates, as well as their spreading pattern in the various wards of University Hospital Center Ibn Rochd of Casablanca, Morocco;
  • A higher bacteremia and respiratory tract infections rate, that affects infant patients;
  • The genotypic approach used to detect the molecular resistance mechanism among the Enterobacteriaceae isolates, shows mainly the spreading of blaCTX-M and blaOXA-48, in addition to various profiles of coexisted genes.

 

 

Competing interests Up    Down

The authors declare no competing interests.

 

 

Authors' contributions Up    Down

Conceptualization: Imane Zalegh and Rajaa Ait Mhand; study design: Khalid Zerouali and Rajaa Ait Mhand; data acquisition and interpretation: Imane Zalegh and Fakhreddine Maaloum; writing-original draft: Imane Zalegh; writing-review and editing: Imane Zalegh, Laila Chaoui, Fakhreddine Maaloum, Khalid Zerouali, and Rajaa Ait Mhand. All the authors read and approved the final version of this manuscript.

 

 

Acknowledgments Up    Down

We are grateful to all the staff of the Bacteriology Laboratory, Virology, and Hospital Hygiene at the Ibn Rochd University Hospital in Casablanca for their tremendous support throughout this study.

 

 

Tables Up    Down

Table 1: primers for polymerase chain reaction (PCR) amplification of genes mediated resistance

Table 2: distribution of isolates among clinical specimens and wards hospital

Table 3: distribution of infections among gender and patients' age groups

Table 4: percentage antibiotics susceptibility of isolates

Table 5: distribution of genes mediated resistance among Enterobacteriaceae species

 

 

References Up    Down

  1. Nordmann P, Naas T, Poirel L. Global spread of Carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriaceae. Emerg Infect Dis. 2011;17(10):1791-1798. PubMed | Google Scholar

  2. Allegranzi B, Nejad SB, Combescure C, Graafmans W, Attar H, Donaldson L et al. Burden of endemic health-care-associated infection in developing countries: systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet. 2011;377(9761):228-241. PubMed | Google Scholar

  3. World Health Organization. The evolving threat of antimicrobial resistance: options for action. 2012. Accessed 24th March, 2022.

  4. Kindu M, Derseh L, Gelaw B, Moges F. Carbapenemase-Producing Non-Glucose-Fermenting Gram-Negative Bacilli in Africa, Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Acinetobacter baumannii: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Int J Microbiol. 2020 Nov 3;2020:9461901. PubMed | Google Scholar

  5. Natoubi S, Barguigua A, Diawara I, Timinouni M, Rakib K, Amghar S et al. Epidemiology of extended-spectrum β-lactamases and carbapenemases producing Enterobacteriaceae in Morocco. J Contemp Clin Pract. 2020;6(2):75-85. Google Scholar

  6. O'Neill J. Antimicrobial resistance: tackling a crisis for the health and wealth of nations. Rev Antimicrob Resist. 2014. Google Scholar

  7. European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing. Breakpoint tables for interpretation of MICs and zone diameters. 2017;1.

  8. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (ed). M07-A10: methods for dilution antimicrobial susceptibility tests for bacteria that grow aerobically: approved standard - tenth edition. Wayne, PA. Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards. 2015.

  9. Magiorakos AP, Srinivasan A, Carey RB, Carmeli Y, Falagas ME, Giske CG et al. Multidrug-resistant, extensively drug-resistant and pandrug-resistant bacteria: an international expert proposal for interim standard definitions for acquired resistance. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2012 Mar;18(3):268-81. PubMed | Google Scholar

  10. Saladin M, Cao VTB, Lambert T, Donay J-L, Herrmann J-L, Ould-Hocine Z et al. Diversity of CTX-M beta-lactamases and their promoter regions from Enterobacteriaceae isolated in three Parisian hospitals. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 2002;209(2):161-168. PubMed | Google Scholar

  11. Aibinu IE, Ohaegbulam VC, Adenipekun EA, Ogunsola FT, Odugbemi TO, Mee BJ. Extended-spectrum beta-lactamase enzymes in clinical isolates of Enterobacter species from Lagos, Nigeria. J Clin Microbiol. 2003 May;41(5):2197-200. PubMed | Google Scholar

  12. Guessennd N, Bremont S, Gbonon V, Kacou-NDouba A, Ekaza E, Lambert T et al. Résistance aux quinolones de type qnr chez les entérobactéries productrices de bêta-lactamases à spectre élargi à Abidjan en Côte d´Ivoire. Pathol Biol (Paris). 2008;56(7-8):439-446. PubMed | Google Scholar

  13. Dallenne C, Da Costa A, Decré D, Favier C, Arlet G. Development of a set of multiplex PCR assays for the detection of genes encoding important β-lactamases in Enterobacteriaceae. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2010 Mar;65(3):490-5. PubMed | Google Scholar

  14. Poirel L, Walsh TR, Cuvillier V, Nordmann P. Multiplex PCR for detection of acquired carbapenemase genes. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2011 May;70(1):119-23. PubMed | Google Scholar

  15. Huttner A, Harbarth S, Carlet J, Cosgrove S, Goossens H, Holmes A et al. Antimicrobial resistance: a global view from the 2013 World Healthcare-Associated Infections Forum. Antimicrob Resist Infect Control. 2013;2:31. PubMed | Google Scholar

  16. Fasla A, Khaleq K. Apport des prélèvements bactériologiques aux urgences. 2011. Google Scholar

  17. Azimi T, Maham S, Fallah F, Azimi L, Gholinejad Z. Evaluating the antimicrobial resistance patterns among major bacterial pathogens isolated from clinical specimens taken from patients in Mofid Children´s Hospital, Tehran, Iran: 2013-2018. Infect Drug Resist. 2019 Jul 17;12:2089-2102. PubMed | Google Scholar

  18. Beyene D, Bitew A, Fantew S, Mihret A, Evans M. Multidrug-resistant profile and prevalence of extended spectrum β-lactamase and carbapenemase production in fermentative gram-negative bacilli recovered from patients and specimens referred to National Reference Laboratory, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. PLoS One. 2019;14(9):e0222911. PubMed | Google Scholar

  19. Mirzaei B, Bazgir ZN, Goli HR, Iranpour F, Mohammadi F, Babaei R. Prevalence of multi-drug resistant (MDR) and extensively drug-resistant (XDR) phenotypes of Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Acinetobacter baumannii isolated in clinical samples from Northeast of Iran. BMC Res Notes. 2020;13(1):380. PubMed | Google Scholar

  20. Lachhab Z, Frikh M, Maleb A, Kasouati J, Doghmi N, Ben Lahlou Y et al. Bacteraemia in Intensive Care Unit: Clinical, Bacteriological, and Prognostic Prospective Study. Can J Infect Dis Med Microbiol. 2017;2017:4082938. PubMed | Google Scholar

  21. Agyepong N, Govinden U, Owusu-Ofori A, Essack SY. Multidrug-resistant gram-negative bacterial infections in a teaching hospital in Ghana. Antimicrob Resist Infect Control. 2018;7:37. PubMed | Google Scholar

  22. Alvim ALS, Couto BRGM, Gazzinelli A. Epidemiological profile of healthcare-associated infections caused by Carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriaceae. Rev Esc Enferm USP. 2019;53:e03474. PubMed | Google Scholar

  23. Kayode A, Okunrounmu P, Olagbende A, Adedokun O, Hassan A-W, Atilola G. High prevalence of multiple drug resistant enteric bacteria: Evidence from a teaching hospital in Southwest Nigeria. J Infect Public Health. 2020;13(4):651-656. PubMed | Google Scholar

  24. Hassoune S, Nani S, Aalloula O, Benbachir M, Maaroufi A. Incidence des bactériémies nosocomiales dans les services à haut risque du centre hospitalier universitaire de Casablanca (Maroc). Pratiques et Organisation des Soins. 2012;43(1):19-24. Google Scholar

  25. El Kettani A, Maaloum F, Diawara I, Katfy K, Harrar N, Zerouali K et al. Prevalence of Acinetobacter baumannii bacteremia in intensive care units of Ibn Rochd University Hospital, Casablanca. Iran J Microbiol. 2017 Dec;9(6):318-323. PubMed | Google Scholar

  26. Wareham DW, Bean DC, Khanna P, Hennessy EM, Krahe D, Ely A et al. Bloodstream infection due to Acinetobacter spp: epidemiology, risk factors and impact of multi-drug resistance. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2008;27(7):607-612. PubMed | Google Scholar

  27. World Health Organization. Antimicrobial resistance: global report on surveillance. World Health Organization. 2014. Google Scholar

  28. Chaoui L, Mhand R, Mellouki F, Rhallabi N. Contamination of the Surfaces of a Health Care Environment by Multidrug-Resistant (MDR) Bacteria. Int J Microbiol. 2019 Nov 29;2019:3236526. PubMed | Google Scholar

  29. Barguigua A, El Otmani F, Talmi M, Zerouali K, Timinouni M. Emergence of carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae isolates in the Moroccan community. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2012;73(3):290-291. PubMed | Google Scholar

  30. Potron A, Poirel L, Bussy F, Nordmann P. Occurrence of the carbapenem-hydrolyzing β-lactamase gene blaOXA-48 in the environment in Morocco. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2011 Nov;55(11):5413-4. PubMed | Google Scholar

  31. Zavascki AP, Klee BO, Bulitta JB. Aminoglycosides against carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae in the critically ill: the pitfalls of aminoglycoside susceptibility. Expert Rev Anti Infect Ther. 2017;15(6):519-526. PubMed | Google Scholar

  32. Pokhrel B, Koirala T, Shah G, Joshi S, Baral P. Bacteriological profile and antibiotic susceptibility of neonatal sepsis in neonatal intensive care unit of a tertiary hospital in Nepal. BMC Pediatr. 2018;18(1):208. PubMed | Google Scholar

  33. Lahsoune M, Boutayeb H, Zerouali K, Belabbes H, El Mdaghri N. Prevalence and in vitro antimicrobial susceptibility patterns of Acinetobacter baumannii strains in a Moroccan university hospital. Med Mal Infect. 2007 Dec;37(12):828-31. PubMed | Google Scholar

  34. Uwingabiye J, Frikh M, Lemnouer A, Bssaibis F, Belefquih B, Maleb A et al. Acinetobacter infections prevalence and frequency of the antibiotics resistance: comparative study of intensive care units versus other hospital units. Pan African Medical Journal. 2016;23:191. PubMed | Google Scholar

  35. Fadda G, Spanu T, Ardito F, Taddei C, Santangelo R, Siddu A et al. Antimicrobial resistance among non-fermentative Gram-negative bacilli isolated from the respiratory tracts of Italian inpatients: a 3-year surveillance study by the Italian Epidemiological Survey. Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2004;23(3):254-261. PubMed | Google Scholar

  36. Patil S, Chen H, Zhang X, Lian M, Ren PG, Wen F. Antimicrobial Resistance and Resistance Determinant Insights into Multi-Drug Resistant Gram-Negative Bacteria Isolates from Paediatric Patients in China. Infect Drug Resist. 2019;12:3625-3634. PubMed | Google Scholar

  37. Mahrach Y, Mourabit N, Arakrak A, Bakkali M, Laglaoui A. Phenotypic and molecular study of carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriaceae in a regional hospital in northern Morocco. J Clin Med Sci. 2019;3:113. Google Scholar

  38. Barguigua A, Zerouali K, Katfy K, El Otmani F, Timinouni M, Elmdaghri N. Occurrence of OXA-48 and NDM-1 carbapenemase-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae in a Moroccan university hospital in Casablanca, Morocco. Infect Genet Evol. 2015;31:142-148. PubMed | Google Scholar

  39. Poirel L, Benouda A, Hays C, Nordmann P. Emergence of NDM-1-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae in Morocco. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2011 Dec;66(12):2781-3. PubMed | Google Scholar