Home | Volume 45 | Article number 28


A cross-sectional study on the prevalence and drug susceptibility pattern of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus isolated from patients in the Buea Health District, Cameroon

A cross-sectional study on the prevalence and drug susceptibility pattern of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus isolated from patients in the Buea Health District, Cameroon

Morgan Mokeo Ndedy1,2, Raymond Babila Nyasa1, Seraphine Nkie Esemu1,2, Jerome Achah Kfusi1,2, Nene Kaah Keneh1,2, Thomas Njinuwoh Masalla1,2, Lucy Mande Ndip1,2,&


1Department of Microbiology and Parasitology, University of Buea, Buea, Cameroon, 2Laboratory for Emerging Infectious Diseases, University of Buea, Buea, South West Region, Cameroon



&Corresponding author
Lucy Mande Ndip, Department of Microbiology and Parasitology, University of Buea, Buea, Cameroon




Introduction: Staphylococcus aureus, which is part of the normal flora accounts for most acute and chronic infections in humans, and treatment options are greatly limited, when infection is caused by methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA). This study was to determine the prevalence and antimicrobial susceptibility pattern of MRSA from clinical samples obtained randomly from patients in Buea Health District.


Methods: a total of 264 wounds, nasopharynx, and urine samples were collected from patients from different hospitals in Buea and transported to the laboratory in the University of Buea, for analysis. Samples were inoculated on mannitol salt agar for S. aureus isolation, characterized morphologically by gram staining and biochemically by catalase, coagulase, and hemolysis tests. Diagnosis of S. aureus was confirmed by molecular identification of the nuc gene. MRSA was identified from S. aureus by oxacillin screening and confirmed by molecular identification of the mecA gene. The data were analyzed using SPSS version 17.0.


Results: S. aureus was isolated from 70 (26.52%) and all were confirmed molecularly by nuc gene amplification. MRSA by oxacillin screening was 36 (13.64%) while MRSA detected by mecA gene amplification was 34 (12.88%). Antimicrobial susceptibility testing revealed 100% resistance to ampicillin, 88.24% to cefixime and 70.59% to ceftriaxone while low resistance was observed to meropenem (11.76%), doxycycline (14.71%), and vancomycin (17.67%).


Conclusion: MRSA isolated from Buea Health District are resistant to ampicillin, cefixime, and ceftriaxone. The antimicrobials (meropenem, doxycycline, and vancomycin) should be used to treat MRSA infections in Buea Health District.



Introduction    Down

Staphylococcus aureus is one of the major organisms causing bloodstream infection worldwide and is very common in nature [1]. It is also part of the normal flora of humans and is commonly present on the skin and nostrils of carriers, which facilitates its transmission by direct contact. This bacterium is a major human pathogen responsible for a wide range of infections, which include; skin, bone, soft tissue, urinary tract infections, pneumonia, health-care-associated bacteremia in community and hospital settings, and other invasive infections. The continuous use of benzylpenicillin (penicillin G) as the drug of choice for treatment of these infections, has led to the emergence of resistant S. aureus strains caused by a change in penicillin-binding protein (PBP2a), which is encoded by the mecA gene, resulting in strains resistant to penicillins and penicillin-like antibiotics [2]. The emergence of S. aureus isolates resistant to vancomycin and other wide range of structurally unrelated antibiotics have elevated MRSA into a multidrug-resistant strain, making it more dangerous than ever in a hospital environment and recently, also in the community [3,4]. A report from the National Nosocomial Infection Surveillance System (NNISS) of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDCP) (2013-2015) showed that MRSA in India and USA accounts for greater than 60% of Staphylococcus aureus isolates which cause nosocomial infections in Intensive Care Units (ICUs) [5].

Several studies have indicated the existence and emergence of MRSA in many health institutions and health districts in Cameroon [2,6] and recent data from Buea, suggest that Staphylococcus aureus is the most common bacteria in urinogenital clinical specimens [7]. In 2009 the prevalence of Staphylococcus aureus from clinical and environmental samples obtained from Buea was 36.8% and among the isolates, 94.1% and 75.3% were resistant to methicillin and oxacillin respectively and 80% of the isolates were susceptible to vancomycin, 72.9% to ofloxacin and 71.8% to ciprofloxacin [8]. However, the prevalence of MRSA strains and their susceptibility to antimicrobials varies over time. This study aims to determine the current trend in susceptibility of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infection amongst patients seeking medical care in the Buea Health District.



Methods Up    Down

Study area and population: the study was carried out in Buea, the capital city of the South West Region of Cameroon. The town is located on the slope of Mount Cameroon and it is bounded by other towns such as Tiko in the south, Muyuka in the east, and Limbe in the west. Buea has an estimated population of 300,000 inhabitants [9]. The population is made up of students, local farmers, business people, government administrators, and civil servants. Two seasons characterize the area, the dry season which starts from November to February, and the rainy season from March to October [10].

Study design and site: this was a cross-sectional, hospital-based investigation on the prevalence and drug susceptibility pattern of MRSA isolates in the Buea Health District. Clinical samples were collected between May 12 and July 28 2020 for analysis from three hospitals whose services are most solicited within Buea Health District; Buea Regional Hospital, Mount Mary Hospital, and Solidarity Clinic. Laboratory analysis was carried out in the Laboratory for Emerging Infectious Diseases (LEID), University of Buea, Cameroon.

Ethical considerations: participants were educated on the aim and benefit of the study prior to obtaining their informed consent. Assent was obtained from minors, in addition to consent obtained from their parents or guardians. Ethical clearance for this study was obtained from the University of Buea, Faculty of Health Sciences- Institutional Review Board, reference number 2020/1225-07/UB/SG/IRB/FHS, and administrative clearance from Ministry of Public Health Regional Delegation for South West, reference number R11/MINSANTE/SWR/RDPH/PS/703/729.

Sampling strategy: simple random and purposive sampling methods were used to select health facilities from the different categories of health care within the Buea Health District and the number of patients recruited from each health facility was proportionate to the patient population of the health facility. The Buea Regional Hospital was purposively selected since it is the only secondary-level referral health facility in the Buea Health District, while the Mount Mary Hospital was randomly selected from the two confessional hospitals of the district (Seventh Day Adventist Hospital and Mount Mary Hospital). The Solidarity Clinic was selected randomly from all private health facilities. A consecutive and non-probabilistic method was used to enroll participants to obtain either a wound swab or nasopharyngeal swab or urine sample from each patient of either sex of all age groups, resident in the Buea Health District. Urine samples were those of patients presenting urine for analysis in the laboratory; wound swabs from patients with old wounds and nasal swabs from admitted patients and patients soliciting for laboratory examination.

Sample size: the sample size was calculated using Fisher´s formula [11].

Where: n=sample size; Z=statistics for level of confidence = 1.96; d=degree of precision = 0.05; P=prevalence of the disease under investigation=13.16%. P was obtained from the prevalence of MRSA from clinical samples in Laquintinie Hospital Douala, Cameroon, a nearby town to Buea, which was 13.16% [6]. P=13.16/100 = 0.132.

n=176 (minimum sample size required). However, a total of 264 samples were collected; 109 from Buea Regional Hospital, 130 from Mount Mary Hospitals, and 25 from Solidarity Clinic. The 264 samples were composed of 107 urine samples, 50 wound swabs, and 107 nasal swabs.

Laboratory analysis: the workflow from sample collection to data processing is shown in Figure 1. Samples were collected and inoculated on mannitol salt agar, followed by gram staining of yellow colonies to observe for gram-positive cocci in clusters. Colonies presenting these characteristics were purified on nutrient agar and characterized biochemically using catalase, coagulase, and hemolysis tests. Isolates that were positive for catalase, and coagulase and showed beta hemolysis on blood agar were inoculated into 800μL of nutrient broth in Eppendorf tubes, vortexed and incubated at 37°C for 24h. The tubes were then centrifuged at 8000rpm for 5min, 500 to 600μL of the supernatant was dispensed, and 800μL of 50% glycerol was added and the mixture vortexed briefly for 10secs and stored at -20°C for further analysis (Figure 1).

Molecular identification of Staphylococcus aureus: molecular identification of S. aureus targeted the nuc gene using singleplex. To achieve this, stored isolates at -20°C were brought to room temperature, inoculated on nutrient agar, and incubated at 37°C for 24h to obtain colonies for deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) extraction. Bacterial DNA was extracted using the boiling method [12]. Five to ten colonies were suspended in 150μL of phosphate-buffered saline and heated in a water bath at 100°C for 15 min, chilled on ice for 15 min and allowed to thaw at room temperature for 15 min. The freeze-thaw step was repeated and lysed cells were centrifuged at 14000 rpm for 5 min to obtain the supernatant (bacterial DNA) as reported elsewhere [13]. Presence of bacterial DNA in the supernatant was ascertained by agarose gel electrophoresis, stained with Ethidium bromide to observe for bands under ultraviolet light. Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) reaction was set up using 6.5μL of RNase-free water, 5μL supernatant containing bacterial DNA as template, 12.5μL of master mix, 0.5μL each of reverse (GCG ATT GAT GGT GAT ACG GTT) and forward (AGC CAA GCC TTG ACG AAC TAA AGC) primer (Inqababiotec, SA.), to achieve a final volume of 25μL and a final primer concentration of 10μM, as has been used elsewhere [14]. Following optimization, the 280bp fragment of nuc gene was amplified using a thermal cycler (MyCycler™ Thermal Cycler BIORAD, USA) at an initial denaturation of 95°C for 10min, followed by 40 cycles of 1sec denaturation at 94°C for 1min, annealing at 54°C for 30 sec and extension at 72°C for 1min, with a final extension at 72°C for 7 min. The PCR products were electrophoresed at 90volt for 1h in a 1.5% agarose gel, stained with ethidium bromide, visualized under ultraviolet light and photographed using Gel Documentation-XR (BIORAD, Hercules, CA).

Identification of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus: colonies of confirmed Staphylococcus aureus isolates were screened for oxacillin resistance by the Kirby-Bauer disc-diffusion technique. They were suspended in 0.9% NaCl, to achieve an optical density equivalent to 0.5 McFarland barium sulfate standard (1.5 x 108 CFU/ml), as used elsewhere [15], inoculated on Mueller Hinton agar by spread plate technique, followed by the introduction of oxacillin discs and incubation at 37°C for 24 hours. Clear zones of ≥13 mm around the discs revealed susceptibility while ≤10 mm or no clear zones revealed resistance to oxacillin.

Molecular identification of mecA gene in oxacillin-resistant isolate was used to confirm methicillin-resistant S. aureus by PCR. The reaction was composed of 12.5μL of the master mix, 6.5μL of RNase-free water, 5μL the DNA template, 0.5μL of reverse (AGT TCG CAGTTA CCG GAT TTGC) and 0.5μL of forward (AAA ATC GAT AAA GGT TGGC) primers as reported elsewhere [16], to achieve a final volume of 25μL. Following optimization, the reaction was carried out at an initial denaturation at 95°C for 5min, followed by second denaturation at 94°C for 1min, annealing at 50°C for 1min and extension at 72°C for 1min with a final extension at 72°C for 5min after 35 cycles. The products were run on a 1.5% agarose gel alongside with a molecular ladder and stained with Ethidium bromide to confirm the position of the 533bp mecA gene.

Determination of antimicrobial susceptibility pattern of MRSA: Kirby Bauer disc diffusion method was used to determine the anti-biogram of MRSA using vancomycin (30μg), ampicillin (10μg), doxycycline (30μg), ofloxacin (5μg), azithromycin (15μg), amikacin (30μg), clindamycin (2μg), cefixime (5μg), ceftriaxone (30μg) and meropenem (10μg) discs. In essence, approximately 1.5x108 CFU/mL cell density were used to inoculate Muller Hinton agar plate and antibiotic discs were placed at least 24 mm apart and incubated at 35°C for 24h. The diameters of antibiotic inhibition zone were measured and the results obtained were used to classify isolates as being resistant, intermediate resistant or susceptible to a particular antibiotic using standard reference values by the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI, 2013) [17].

Statistical analysis: data were analyzed using Microsoft Excel 2016 and the statistical software SPSS version 17.0. Descriptive statistics was used to obtain prevalence of S. aureus and MRSA, while the Chi-square test was used to investigate the association between S. aureus, and MRSA with demographic factors. Statistical significance was set at p<0.05. The percentage sensitivity of MRSA isolates to the different antibiotics were presented on bar charts.



Results Up    Down

Socio-demographic data of patients: out of the 264 samples collected from patients most (177/264) were females (Table 1). Based on age, majority of participants were between the ages of 21-40 years (155/264). The majority (130/264) of the patients were from Mount Mary Hospital and urine samples constituted 107, nasal swabs were 107, and 50 wound samples.

Isolation and identification of Staphylococcus aureus: from a total of 264 samples inoculated on mannitol salt agar, 172 fermented mannitol appeared as yellow colonies with yellow zones surrounding the colonies on the agar plate. Out of the 172 samples that fermented mannitol, 164 of the samples were gram-positive cocci occurring in clusters, which were purified on nutrient agar. The purified colonies were observed to be catalase positive (164), of which 156 were coagulase-positive, and DNA was isolated from 96 samples which showed hemolysis on blood agar, from the 156 coagulase-positive samples. The DNA extracted from the 96 samples was separated by electrophoresis and stained with ethidium bromide for visualization. Extracted DNA was also used for nuc gene detection by PCR. Seventy of 96 isolates were positive for the nuc gene with a molecular weight of 280bp.

Occurrence of Staphylococcus aureus isolate with respect to age, gender, sample type, and hospital: Staphylococcus aureus infection did not differ with gender (26.55% in females and 26.44% in males) and aged group, with all age groups having a prevalence of 26% (Table 2). The majority (36.45%) of the urine samples were contaminated with S. aureus while 4 (8.00%) of the isolates were obtained from wound samples and 25.23% of the nasal swabs were contaminated with S. aureus and this difference was significant (p=0.001). Most 38 (29.23%) of the S. aureus isolates were isolated from patients attending the Mount Mary Hospital compared to other hospitals (p=0.25).

Phenotypic and molecular identification of MRSA by oxacillin screening: all the 70 isolates in which the nuc gene was amplified were screened for methicillin resistance using oxacillin. Clear zones around the discs ≥13 mm revealed susceptibility while little or no clear zones (≤10 mm) revealed resistance and values between 11-12mm were judged as intermediate. Generally, out of the 264 clinical samples analyzed, 194 samples were negative for nuc gene while 70 (26.52%) of the isolates had the nuc gene. Thirty-four (12.88%) of the S. aureus were oxacillin susceptible (OSSA) while 36 (13.64%) were oxacillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (ORSA). Of the 36 samples, which were oxacillin resistant MecA gene was amplified in 34 (12.88%) of the isolates.

Occurrence of methicillin-resistant S. aureus based on mecA gene amplification and demographic factors: majority of the MRSA 6 (54.55%) were isolated from individuals of ages ≤20 years, although there was no significant difference between age groups (p=0.77) as shown in Table 3. Male gender (60.87%), wound samples (75.00%) had the highest prevalence of MRSA, but were not significantly different from the others, while there was a significant difference in the occurrence of S. aureus amongst hospitals (p=0.00) with Solidarity Hospital (72.73%) having the highest occurrence of MRSA. Most of the MRSA were isolated from males (14) and urine samples (20) (Table 3).

Prevalence of MRSA by mecAgene amplification: out of 264 clinical samples analyzed, S. aureus was isolated from 70 (26.52%) and MRSA with mecA gene was amplified from 34 (12.88%) but the gene was absent in 36 (13.64%) of the isolates (Figure 2).

Antimicrobial susceptibility pattern of MRSA strains to different antimicrobial agents: the antimicrobial susceptibility test revealed that 34 (100%) were resistant to ampicillin, 30 (88.24%) were resistant to cefixime, 24 (70.59%) were resistant to ceftriaxone and 20 (58.82%) were resistant to azithromycin (Table 4). Also, 17 (50.00%) were resistant to clindamycin, 14 (41.18%) were resistant to ofloxacin, 8 (23.53%) were resistant to amikacin, 6 (17.65%) of the isolates were resistant to vancomycin, and 4 (11.76%) were resistant to meropenem. Thirty of the isolates (88.24%) were susceptible to meropenem, 28 (82.35%) were susceptible to vancomycin, 25 (73.53%) were susceptible to doxycycline, 23 (67.65%) were susceptible to amikacin and 17 (50.0%) were susceptible ofloxacin while 4 (11.79%) were susceptible to ceftriaxone and cefixime. Likewise, 8 (23.53%) were susceptible to azithromycin and 11 (32.35%) were susceptible to clindamycin. None of the isolates were intermediate to vancomycin, ampicillin, cefixime, and meropenem while 6 (17.65%) were intermediate to ceftriaxone, azithromycin, and clindamycin. Furthermore, 3 (8.82%) were intermediate to ofloxacin and amikacin and lastly, 4 (11.76%) were susceptible to doxycycline (Table 4).

Antimicrobial susceptibility pattern of MRSA isolates from the different sample types: out of the 34 MRSA isolates with mecA gene, 11 (4.17%) were from nasal swabs, 20 (7.58%) from urine samples and 3 (1.14%) from wound swabs. A total of 11 (100%) of the isolates from nasal swabs were sensitive to meropenem, 11 (100%) were sensitive to doxycycline, 9 (81.82%) were sensitive to amikacin, 8 (72.73%) were sensitive to vancomycin and 7 (63.64%) were sensitive to ofloxacin (Figure 3 A). The least sensitive of the isolates were; ceftriaxone 3 (27.27%), azithromycin 2 (18.18%), and cefixime 3 (27.27%). Also, 11 (100%) of the nasal isolates were resistant to ampicillin, 9 (81.82%) were resistant to cefixime and 7 (63.64%) were resistant to azithromycin. For urine samples, 18 (90.00%) were sensitive to vancomycin, 12 (60.00%) were sensitive doxycycline, 10 (50.0%) were sensitive ofloxacin, 16 (80.00%) were sensitive meropenem and 13 (75.00%) were sensitive amikacin (Figure 3 B). All the isolates from the urine; 20 (100%) were resistant to ampicillin and 19 (95.00%) were resistant to cefixime. Of all the isolates from wound samples; 3 (100%) of the isolates were sensitive to vancomycin and meropenem while 3 (100%) were resistant to ampicillin, ofloxacin, and cefixime (Figure 3 C).



Discussion Up    Down

Based on morphological and biochemical characteristics, 36.36% of the total samples analyzed were Staphylococcus aureus, however, only 26.52% were confirmed by molecular techniques for the presence of the nuc gene. This value is similar to the 36% prevalence of S. aureus reported in Zaria, Nigeria [18], but differs from 57.5% prevalence observed in Anbar, Bangladesh [19]. In this study, the overall prevalence of MRSA was 12.88% while that of methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA) was 13.64%. This is similar to 13.16% reported in Douala [6], but higher than 5.26% reported in Peshawar, Pakistan [20]. These variations in the prevalence of MRSA could be as a result of differences in environmental factors, methodology employed, number of samples used, or other practices used in the control of the infections.

Although there was no significant difference in the isolation of MRSA with respect to age, gender, and sample types, except for the different hospitals, MRSA was isolated more from males (60.87%) than females (42.55%). This result is similar to previous studies in Douala, Cameroon, where a higher prevalence was recorded in males 53.33% than in females 46.67% [6]. However, the difference was not significant. The majority (48.78%) of the MRSA was isolated from participants aged 21-40 years old and this is in agreement with a similar study carried out in Yaoundé, the capital of Cameroon where the age group 21-40 years old had the highest prevalence of 56.2% [2], and in Douala, the economic capital of Cameroon, they also had the highest prevalence of 66.67% [6]. The highest occurrence of MRSA was observed in urine samples (51.28%) compared to the other samples. This high prevalence of MRSA in urine has also been reported in Nigeria [21]. A high prevalence of the MRSA strains was observed in Solidarity Clinic (72.73%) and Mount Mary Hospital (52.63%) than in the Buea Regional Hospital (28.57%) and the differences were significant. It has been observed that the percentage of MRSA strains has increased worldwide in the last two decades and the percentage varies markedly across different countries and among hospitals of a particular country [2]. Improper infection prevention practices in the different hospital set up, random use of antibiotics; hospitalization in intensive care unit contribute to the emergence and spread of MRSA [2]. These factors as well as the differences in the study population may explain these variations.

Penicillin showed the highest level of resistance (100%) against MRSA isolates. This is similar to a previous study in Douala, the economic capital of Cameroon where high levels of resistance were also observed against penicillins (80-100%) [6]. All MRSA isolates with mecA genes that were resistant to oxacillin, were also resistant to ampicillin 34 (100%). This result is similar to a study in Zaria, Nigeria where 100% of the isolates were resistant to ampicillin [22]. This is obvious since MRSA are bacteria that have acquired the gene for beta-lactamase production; an enzyme that breaks the beta-lactam ring in penicillins [6]. However, resistance against meropenem (11.76%), doxycycline (14.71%), and vancomycin (17.67%) were the least. This is closely in line with a similar study in Kabul, Afghanistan with 0.00% resistance to vancomycin, 16.4% resistance to meropenems, 8.6% resistance to doxycycline [23]. Thus, these are the recommended antibiotics for the treatment of MRSA in Buea Health District and may also suggest that, these antibiotics are not commonly overused and abused in the health district. In this study, the highest sensitivity was observed against meropenem (88.24%), which is higher than the 34.2% observed in a study conducted in Houston, USA [24].

Based on the antibiotic susceptibility pattern of MRSA from different anatomical sites to the different antibiotics, this study showed that 100% of the nasal isolates were sensitive to meropenem and doxycycline and 81.82% of the isolates were sensitive to amikacin. For the urine sample, 90% were sensitive to vancomycin, 60% were sensitive to doxycycline while 80% were sensitive to meropenem, and 75% were sensitive to amikacin. Isolates from wound samples showed 100% sensitivity to meropenem and vancomycin. Generally, though the isolates were more sensitive to meropenem, vancomycin, and doxycycline, the susceptibility of isolates from different sites showed some differences, indicating that particular drugs are preferred for the treatment of infection in specific sites.



Conclusion Up    Down

A high prevalence of MRSA (12.88%) was observed in Buea Health District, which were resistant to ampicillin (100%), cefixime (88.24), ceftriaxone (70.59%) but sensitive to meropenem (88.25%), vancomycin (82.35%) and doxycycline (73.53%).

What is known about this topic

  • S. aureus which are part of the normal flora can cause acute and chronic infections in humans;
  • S. aureus are known to colonize the upper respiratory tract, urinogenital tracts, and wounds;
  • Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus poses a greater health threat with limited options for treatment.

What this study adds

  • A high prevalence of 12.9% colonization with MRSA amongst patients seeking for medical attention in the Buea Health District;
  • MRSA isolated from the Buea Health District are resistant to ampicillin, cefixime and ceftriaxone;
  • MRSA isolated from Buea Health District is sensitive to meropenems, doxycycline, and vancomycin.



Competing interests Up    Down

The authors declare no competing interests.



Authors' contributions Up    Down

This work was conceived by Morgan Mokeo Ndedy and supervised by Raymond Babila Nyasa and Lucy Mande Ndip. The data was collected by Morgan Mokeo Ndedy, Jerome Achah Kfusi, Nene Kaah Keneh, Thomas Njinuwoh Masalla, and Seraphine Nkie Esemu. Morgan Mokeo Ndedy, Raymond Babila Nyasa, Seraphine Nkie Esemu, and Lucy Mande Ndip took part in the data analysis. Raymond Babila Nyasa and Morgan Mokeo Ndedy wrote the first draft of the manuscript. Jerome Achah and Mrs Keneh Nene Kaah, Mr Masalla Thomas assisted in the PCR procedure. All the authors read and approved the final version of this manuscript.



Acknowledgments Up    Down

The authors of this manuscript are grateful to the administration of the Mount Mary Hospital, Buea Regional Hospital and Solidarity Clinic for accepting this study to be carried out in their health facility and to the patients for taking part in the study.



Tables and figures Up    Down

Table 1: socio-demographic characteristics of study participants

Table 2: distribution of S. aureus isolates with respect to age, gender type of sample and the hospital

Table 3: distribution of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus by mecA gene amplification with respect to age, gender, sample type and hospital

Table 4: antimicrobial susceptibility pattern of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus strains

Figure 1: sample collection and processing algorithm

Figure 2: prevalence of mecA positive methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus

Figure 3: (A,B,C) antimicrobial susceptibility pattern of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus strains isolates from the different sample types



References Up    Down

  1. Ansari S, Jha RK, Mishra SK, Tiwari BR, Asaad AM. Recent advances in Staphylococcus aureus infection: focus on vaccine development. Infect Drug Resist. 2019;12:1243-1255. PubMed | Google Scholar

  2. Kengne M, Fotsing O, Ndomgue T, Nwobegahay JM. Antibiotic susceptibility patterns of Staphylococcus aureus strains isolated at the Yaounde Central Hospital, Cameroon: a retro prospective study. Pan African Medical Journal. 2019;32:103. PubMed | Google Scholar

  3. Norazah A, Lim VK, Munirah SN, Kamel AG. Staphylococcus aureus carriage in selected communities and their antibiotic susceptibility patterns. Med J Malaysia. 2003;58(2):255-61. PubMed | Google Scholar

  4. Lu PL, Chin, LC, Peng CF, Chiang YH, Chen TP, Ma L et al. Risk factors and molecular analysis of community methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus carriage. J Clin Microbiol. 2005;43(1):132-139. PubMed | Google Scholar

  5. Kumar M. Multidrug-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus, India, 2013-2015. Emerg Infect Dis. 2016 Sep;22(9):1666-7. PubMed | Google Scholar

  6. Bissong ME, Wirgham T, Enekegbe MA, Niba PT, Foka FE. Prevalence and Antibiotic Susceptibility Patterns of Methicillin Resistant Staphylococcus aureus in Patients Attending the Laquintinie Hospital Douala, Cameroon. European Journal of Clinical and Biomedical Sciences. 2016;2(6):92-96. Google Scholar

  7. Amin ET, Njumkeng C, Kika BT, Fualefac A, Njukeng P. Pattern of Antimicrobial Resistance among Bacterial Isolates from Urogenital Clinical Specimens: A Descriptive Study from the Buea Health District, Cameroon. Drugs Real World Outcomes. 2018;5(2):101-108. PubMed | Google Scholar

  8. Nkwelang G, Jane-Francis TKA, Lucien HK, Emmanuel DN, Roland NN. Staphylococcus aureus isolates from clinical and environmental samples in a semi-rural area of Cameroon: phenotypic characterization of isolates. Afr J Microbiol Res. 2009;3(11):731-736. Google Scholar

  9. Mandaah FV, Nicholas T, Esemu SN, Vanessa ABT, Destin KTG, Atiepoh NC et al. Trends in the population knowledge, attitudes and practices toward COVID-19 in the Buea municipality two months after the onset of the pandemic in Cameroon. Pan African Medical Journal. 2020;37:134. PubMed | Google Scholar

  10. Nyasa RB, Zofou D, Kimbi HK, Kum KM, Ngu RC, Titanji VP. The current status of malaria epidemiology in Bolifamba, atypical Cameroonian rainforest zone: an assessment of intervention strategies and seasonal variations. BMC Public Health. 2015;15:1105. PubMed | Google Scholar

  11. Isreal GD. Determining sample size. Gainesville: Institute Food Agricultural. Science, University. Florida. AJSR. 1992;27:1-5. Google Scholar

  12. Yamagishi J, Sato Y, Shinozaki N, Ye B, Tsuboi A, Nagasaki M et al. Comparison of Boiling and Robotics Automation Method in DNA Extraction for Metagenomic Sequencing of Human Oral Microbes. PLoS One. 2016 Apr 22;11(4):e0154389. PubMed | Google Scholar

  13. Greco M, Sez CA, Brown MT, Bitonti MB. A simple and effective method for high quality co-extraction of genomic DNA and total RNA from low biomass Ectocarpus siliculosus, the model brown alga. PLoS One. 2014 May 27;9(5):e96470. PubMed | Google Scholar

  14. Cho JI, Jung HJ, Kim YJ, Park SH, Ha SD, Kim KS. Detection of methicillin resistance in Staphylococcus aureus isolates using two-step triplex PCR and conventional methods. J Microbiol Biotechnol. 2007;17(4):673-6. PubMed | Google Scholar

  15. Bonjean M, Hodille E, Dumitrescu O, Dupieux C, Nkoud Mongo C, Allam C et al. Disk Diffusion Testing for Detection of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococci: Does Moxalactam Improve upon Cefoxitin? J Clin Microbiol. 2016 Dec;54(12):2905-2909. PubMed | Google Scholar

  16. Ibrahim OMA, Bilal NE, Osman OF, Magzoub MA. Assessment of methicillin resistant Staphylococcus Aureus detection methods: analytical comparative study. Pan African Medical Journal. 2017;27:281. PubMed | Google Scholar

  17. Michael ND, Paul GA, Sujata MB, William AC, Mary JF, Ronald NJ. For the Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing Subcommittee of the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. Clinical Infectious Diseases. 2013.

  18. Onanuga A, Onaolapo JA. Antimicrobial Susceptibility of Community-associated Staphylococcus aureus Isolates from Healthy Women in Zaria, Nigeria. Tropical Journal of Pharmaceutical Research. 2008;7(1):929-934. Google Scholar

  19. Mushtak TS. Molecular study on nuc gene-positive Staphylococcus aureus resistant to methicillin and vancomycin isolated from infected wounds. Journal Basic Medical Sciences. 2018;16:220.

  20. Khan RA, Rahman UA, Ahmad M, Jaseem A, Jabbar SA, Khan A et al. Prevalence and Antibiotic Susceptibility Profile of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) Isolated from Different Clinical Samples in District Peshawar. Journal Appl Environmental Biological Science. 2014;4(8S):40-46. Google Scholar

  21. Abubakar U, Sulaiman A, Syed S. Prevalence, trend and antimicrobial susceptibility of Methicillin Resistant Staphylococcus aureus in Nigeria: a systematic review. J Infect Public Health. 2018;11(6):763-770. PubMed | Google Scholar

  22. Udobi CE, Obajuluwa AF, Onaolapo JA. Prevalence and antibiotic resistance pattern of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus from an orthopaedic hospital in Nigeria. Biomed Res Int. 2013;2013:860467. PubMed | Google Scholar

  23. Naimi HM, Rasekh H, Noori AZ, Bahaduri MA. Determination of antimicrobial susceptibility patterns in Staphylococcus aureus strains recovered from patients at two main health facilities in Kabul, Afghanistan. BMC Infect Dis. 2017;29:17(1):737. PubMed | Google Scholar

  24. Varela MC, Roch M, Taglialegna A, Long SW, Saavedra MO, Rose WE et al. Carbapenems drive the collateral resistance to ceftaroline in cystic fibrosis patients with MRSA. Commun Biol. 2020 Oct 22;3(1):599. PubMed | Google Scholar