Research | Volume 40, Article 189, 29 Nov 2021 | 10.11604/pamj.2021.40.189.27903

An entomological survey in the Sudanese Guinean environmental transition zone after indoor residual spraying, Chad

Israël Demba Kodindo, Elise Yangalbé Kalnoné, Adoum Mahamat Oumar, Moundai Tchonfinet, Amen Nakebang Fadel, Brahim Adef Abba, Djédion Belemel, Péka Mallaye, Clément Kerah Hinzoumbe

Corresponding author: Clément Kerah Hinzoumbe, Programme National de Lutte Contre le Paludisme, Ministère de la Santé Publique, N'Djamena, Tchad

Received: 16 Jan 2021 - Accepted: 03 Nov 2021 - Published: 29 Nov 2021

Domain: Epidemiology,Parasitology,Hygiene and sanitation

Keywords: Malaria, transmission, indoor residual spraying, Sudanese Guinean zone, Chad

©Israël Demba Kodindo et al. Pan African Medical Journal (ISSN: 1937-8688). This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution International 4.0 License (, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Cite this article: Israël Demba Kodindo et al. An entomological survey in the Sudanese Guinean environmental transition zone after indoor residual spraying, Chad. Pan African Medical Journal. 2021;40:189. [doi: 10.11604/pamj.2021.40.189.27903]

Available online at:

Home | Volume 40 | Article number 189


An entomological survey in the Sudanese Guinean environmental transition zone after indoor residual spraying, Chad

An entomological survey in the Sudanese Guinean environmental transition zone after indoor residual spraying, Chad

Israël Demba Kodindo1, Elise Yangalbé Kalnoné1, Adoum Mahamat Oumar2, Moundai Tchonfinet3, Amen Nakebang Fadel1, Brahim Adef Abba1, Djédion Belemel1, Péka Mallaye4, Clément Kerah Hinzoumbe1,&


1Programme National de Lutte Contre le Paludisme, Ministère de la Santé Publique, N´Djamena, Tchad, 2Programme National de Lutte Contre l´Onchocercose, Ministère de la Santé Publique, N´Djamena, Tchad, 3Programme National de l´Éradication de ver de Guinée, Ministère de la Santé Publique, N´Djamena, Tchad, 4Programme National de Lutte Contre la Trypanosomiase Humaine Africaine, Ministère de la Santé publique, Moundou, Tchad



&Corresponding author
Clément Kerah Hinzoumbe, Programme National de Lutte Contre le Paludisme, Ministère de la Santé Publique, N´Djamena, Tchad




Introduction: malaria is a major public health issue in Africa. In Chad in 2019, with 955,243 confirmed cases and 2,955 deaths, malaria is the main cause of consultations. A longitudinal entomological study was conducted in Moïssala Health District. Its objective was to assess the impact of indoor residual spraying with 80% bendiocarb wettable powder on malaria transmission.


Methods: two areas were defined for the study: Dembo, located in the sprayed area, Moïssala, in the untreated area. Two sampling methods were used: pyrethrum spray catches and human landing catches.


Results: sixteen sessions of human landing catches totalling 32 man-nights were conducted and 160 rooms/site were sprayed. Two anopheles were captured in Dembo and 547 in Moïssala. In Moïssala, An coluzzii, An funestus and An rufipes were captured in the rooms and on human bait. An colluzzii and An funestus were captured in pyrethrum spray catches in Dembo. The anophelian human landing catches density was zero in Dembo while it was 8.38 bites/man/night in outdoor and 10.06 bits/man/night in indoor in Moïssala. Only An coluzzii was found infected in human landing catches and sporozoite index of was 7.46% (10/134) in outdoor and 7.45% (12/161) in indoor in Moïssala. Malaria transmission was estimated at 0.63 infected bites/man/night in outdoor and 0.75 infected bites/man/night in indoor i.e. 229.95 infected bites/man/year in outdoor and 273.75 infected bites/man/year. In pyrethrum spray catches, An coluzzii and An rufipes were the two species found infected in Moïssala with sporozoite indices of 6.70% (23/343) and 20% (2/10) respectively. However, in Dembo, neither of the two captured mosquitoes was found infected.


Conclusion: the indoor residual spraying campaign in the eastern zone of Moïssala has led to the collapse of vectors´ density and aggressiveness. However, its evaluation over a short period of time is not sufficient to assess the impact of malaria transmission in this constant and endemic malaria zone.



Introduction    Down

In 2019, 229 million cases and 409,000 deaths of malaria were recorded in 87 malaria-endemic countries. The World Health Organization (WHO) African Region shouldered 94% (215 M) of all cases and two thirds of the global deaths continued to affect children under 5 years in sub-Saharan Africa (WHO, 2020) [1].


However, since its creation, the World Health Organization has always had malaria eradication on its agenda [2]. Efforts have been made to eradicate this scourge in many parts of the world [3]. However, in Africa, eradication is being delayed not only for economic reasons, but also because of insufficient knowledge of how the disease is transmitted in the continent's different ecological areas. In Chad in 2020, with 955,243 confirmed cases and 2,955 deaths, malaria is the main cause of consultations in health facilities i.e. 42% [4]. In addition to the loss of human lives, malaria is costly in terms of public health expenditures [5].


Divided into three geo-climatic zones that determine three epidemiological facies of malaria, Northern Chad is desert with no local transmission [6]. The Sahelian Climate Center corresponds to an area with unstable malaria due to short seasonal transmission. The south with a Sudanian to Sudano-Guinean climate is characterized by stable malaria, with long seasonal transmission [7]. Most of the entomological studies conducted in Chad have concerned the Sudanian and Sahelian zone where malaria transmission is attributed to An gambiae sl, An funestus, An pharoensis and An ziemanni [8,9]. Yet, to date, no survey has assessed the dynamics of malaria transmission in the transition zone between the Sudanese and Guinean zones. However, the epidemiology of malaria depends largely on the biotope.


Our survey focuses on malaria transmission. It was carried out at the request of the non-governmental organization "Médecins Sans Frontière-France (MSF-France)" to evaluate the effectiveness of the indoor spraying campaign carried out in the eastern zone of the Moïssala Health District. Since 2010, MSF-France has been working in the Moïssala Health District in support of the ministry of public health and the national malaria control program. It has developed preventive (awareness, seasonal malaria chemoprophylaxis) and curative (seasonal malaria hospital management unit) activities.


In an effort to strengthen protection against mosquito bites in addition to long-lasting insecticide-treated nets distributed by the ministry of public health, MSF-France considered using Fendona® (a pyrethroid insecticide) for an indoor residual spraying campaign in the eastern zone of the Moïssala Health District. The recommendations of the national malaria control program following a study carried out in 2015 on mosquito susceptibility in the said health district (data presented in another article) finally led to the use of Ficam® WP (insecticides of the carbamates class ideal for vector control). The objective of this study is to evaluate the impact of bendiocarb indoor residual spray (IRS) on the malaria vector composition, behaviour and plasmodium infection rate in Southern Chad.



Methods Up    Down

Study area and population: to assess the impact of this campaign, two sites were selected. These are Dembo, located in the sprayed area and Moïssala, which was not treated at all, served as a control. Moïssala (8°20'16''N 17°46'05''E) is the capital of the department of Barh Sara, Mandoul Region. It is located 75 km from Koumra, the capital of the region and more than 700 km south of N'Djamena (Figure 1). It has approximately 33,098 inhabitants. Moïssala town is located on the banks of a permanent river, the Barh Sara, a tributary of the Chari river that originates in the Central African Republic. The river can be crossed with a ferry or a canoe. However, during the rainy season and depending on the level of the floods, the crossing with the ferry is not always guaranteed. The alternative is the road for a two-day trip to Dembo.


Dembo is the capital of the Dembo sub-prefecture in the Department of Barh Sara. It is located 25 km east of Moïssala and about 27 km north of the border with the Central African Republic. It has approximately 19,013 inhabitats. The city is bordered by a pond (Goumoud) which is watered in the rainy-season and dried up in the dry season. During rainy season, swamps are formed between Dembo and Moïssala, making traffic extremely difficult. Sometimes, when the rains are very heavy, the road is impassable throughout the season but this difficulty disappears completely towards the end of the dry season.


The two cities have geographical and cultural similarities. The climate is tropical of the Sudano-Guinean type, characterized by the alternation of a long rainy season, from May to November, and a dry season, from December to April. The average annual rainfall exceeds 900 mm/year with a maximum of rainfall in August. The average annual temperatures range from 17°C in December/January to 40°C in March/April. Soils are generally sandy or clayey with a high humus content. In some places, soil impermeability causes swampy areas during the rainy season. The once heavily forested region has undergone intense clearing due to high population pressure.


The forest, which consists of very large trees (fig trees, "caïlcédrats", tamarind trees, "Karités", "Nérés" etc.), vines and epiphytic plants, has suffered particularly from human activity, which has largely cleared it to replace it with food crops, but now only remains in the form of highly degraded galleries along watercourses. The main crops are: sorghum, groundnuts, rice, cassava, cotton, beans, sesame and market gardening. The population is composed of Mbaye, Nar, Gor, Ngama, Daye and Peulhs ethnic groups. The activities practiced by the population are: traditional rainfed agriculture, fruit growing, animal husbandry, trade and fishing. Large and small livestock are parked at night in enclosures in the vicinity of houses.


Most of the houses are of traditional, rectangular and circular types, with dry clay or brick walls. Their roofs are made of metal sheet or thatch. The population is supplied with drinking water through traditional wells and boreholes equipped with human-powered pumps. The main diseases of the inhabitants of Moïssala and Dembo are in order of importance from the point of view of the number of cases reported by health facilities: malaria, mainly due to Plasmodium falciparum is endemic, malnutrition, measles, meningitis, etc. Entomological data from the region are non-existent. Both cities use the same vector control methods based on the use of long-lasting insecticide-treated nets widely distributed to all households during the 2014 mass campaign. The study took place from 7th to 24th December 2016 in four of the eight districts of the city of Moïssala and in four of the seven districts that make up the city of Dembo (Figure 1).




Sampling techniques: mosquito population sampling was carried out by two methods of capture: 1) human landing catches at night (indoor and outdoor); 2) pyrethrum spray catches (Red Can®) during the day.


Human landing catches: human landing catches has been studied using the Le Goff et al. method [10]. For this method, 3 parameters were determined: 1) the human biting rate (Ma) is the number of vectors biting an individual over a fixed period of time; 2) the sporozoite rate (S) is the number of mosquitoes infected with sporozoïtes divided by the total number of mosquitoes examined; 3) entomological inoculation rate (EIR) is a number of infectious bites per person per unit time EIR = MaS.


The catches were made by volunteers, all young men recruited in each city. These volunteers were previously trained after obtaining their consent. "Men-night" are used both as bait and captors. They were protected from malaria by sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine chemoprophylaxis. Catches were made for four consecutive nights in four neighbourhoods of each site, with one hut per neighbourhood. This corresponds to 16 catch sessions per site, or 32 "men-night". The neighbourhoods were selected randomly, for each capture point, the consent of the head of the household was obtained for the access of the catchers to their household. For each compound, two catch points are retained. One inside the hut (used as a bedroom) and the other outside. The captures are organized from 6 p.m. to 6 a.m. by two teams of two capturers each. The first team operates from 6 p.m. to midnight and the second from midnight to 6 a.m.


Volunteers are rotated at each capture session (between teams, capture points and houses) to minimize biases due to their individual ability and attractiveness. Each capturer is equipped with a torch, a watch, hemolysis tubes and bags labelled by time slot and bearing the identification of the capture point. In a practical way, each volunteer, seated on a bench/stool/chair, captures with a hemolysis tube the mosquitoes placed on his bare legs up to his knees. The hemolysis tubes containing the mosquitoes are then placed in bags corresponding to catch time slots.


Pyrethrum spray catches with insecticides: this method was used for the collection of female endophilic mosquitoes to assess the density of resting mosquitoes in bedrooms. It consists of spraying a pyrethrum solution into bedrooms to collect mosquitoes at rest. The insecticides used are commercial products based on ORO brand pyrethroids (permethrin: 0.25%; tetramethrin: 0.20%; d-ferothrin: 0.01%; piperonyl butoxide: 0.34%). Before each spray, white bed sheets were spread to cover the entire floor of the room and the furniture, then an agent protected by a mask and glasses, after closing the door and windows, sprays the room for about fifteen seconds before leaving. After about ten minutes of waiting, the sheets are carefully removed and the knocked-down-mosquitoes are recovered with the help of pliers in petri dishes bearing indications on the site, the district, the compound and room number. These spraying sessions take place between 6 a.m. and 11 a.m.


Treatment of captured mosquitoes: mosquitoes captured by the above methods are identified using a binocular magnifying glass according to the morphological genus and species criteria [11]. Females of anopheles are then counted and classified according to the location, time and method of capture, repletion state of their abdomen (unfed, fed, half-gravid and gravid) and individually deposited in microtubes containing a desiccator (silicagel) for transport and storage. The microtubes are assembled in bags and stored at minus 20°C for further analysis at the laboratory of "Laboratoire du Centre de Recherche Entomologique de Cotonou (Benin)". The determination of the circumsporozoite antigen of malaria parasites in mosquitoes was done by the Elisa technique [12,13]. Molecular identification of An gambiae complex species was performed by polymerase chain reaction short interspersed nuclear element (PCR SINE) 200 according to the protocol of Santolamazza et al. [14].


Statistical analysis: all data recorded on the survey sheets were entered into Microsoft Excel software and transferred to version 20 of the IBM SPSS statistical analysis software. The human biting rate (Ma) was calculated from the number of bites received per man per night. Letter m represents the number of mosquitoes per man and a, the daily frequency of bites performed by a female anopheles on a man. The sporozoite index corresponds to the presence in females of anopheles of the circumsporozoite antigen established by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay circumsporozoite protein (ELISA CSP) research. This index is estimated in number of infected female anopheles out of the total number of anopheles analyzed times 100. The entomological inoculation rate (EIR) was calculated from the product of the daily human biting density (ma) and the proportion of females with CSP antigen (s). The daily entomological inoculation rate allows the monthly and annual inoculation rate to be deducted. Anophelian density is the product of endophilic anophelian mosquitoes and the number of rooms sprayed. Fisher test was used to compare the different entomological parameters.


Ethical considerations: this work was presented and obtained authorization from the ministry of public health and from the administrative and health authorities of the Mandoul Region. Individual informed consent was obtained from of volunteers who collect mosquitoes and from room owners. The volunteers were trained and protected against malaria chemoprophylaxis based on sulfadoxine pyriethamine.



Results Up    Down

Human landing catches: time rhythm and human biting rate: in Moïssala, the host-seeking of mosquitoes starts from 6 p.m. and continues throughout the night both indoor and outdoor. There is a high rate of biting between 10 p.m. and 4 a.m., no matter where you are. Indoor, the bite peak occurs around 3 a.m. while outside, a high rate is reached earlier, between 10 p.m. and 11 p.m., and a second one between midnight and 1 a.m. (Figure 2). During the four successive night captures, 303 anopheles were captured in Moïssala while in Dembo, the human biting rate was zero for the same number of capture sessions. The 303 anopheles were captured during 16 capture sessions totalling 32 men-night (16 for outdoor collection and 16 for indoor collection). The average human biting anophelian density in Moïssala was 8.38 bites/man/night in outdoor and 10.06 bits/man/night in indoor in Moïssala (Table 1).


An coluzzii bites both indoor and outdoor. However, 54.58% (161/295) of the females were caught indoors, indicating the tendency of this species to endophagy. There was significant difference between in outdoor and indoor collection (P˂0.001). On the other hand, Anopheles funestus is exclusively caught outdoors and 75% of An. Rufipes are caught outdoors as well. The distribution of the number of anopheles caught on humans is summarized in Table 2 for each species. Sporozoite indices of human landing catches: the sporozoite antigen indices tested in An funestus and An rufipes were negative. On the other hand, out of a total of 295 An coluzzii randomly selected and observed at ELISA for infection, 10 mosquitoes from outdoor collection (10/134) and 12 from indoor collection (12/161) were found to carry plasmodium sporozoites, representing a sporozoite index of 7.46% et 7.45% respectively No significant difference was observed between outdoor and indoor transmission (P=0.99). In Dembo, no test has been performed because mosquito collection was null in this area (Table 3).


The entomological inoculation rate: the average entomological inoculation rate of An coluzzii in Moïssala during the study period was 0.63 infected bites per man per night outdoor and 0.75 indoor i.e. 229.75 and 273.75 infected bites per man per year respectively. Time distribution of malaria transmission in Moïssala: hourly host-seeking of Moïssala's mosquitoes starts from 6 p.m. and continues throughout the night. However, the schedules of infected bites are observed from 8 p.m. and persist throughout the rest of the night. However, transmission is null between 6 p.m. and 8 p.m. as well as in the early morning. The high transmission rate occurs during host-seeking peaks, reaching an average of a maximum of five infested bites per person per night during the survey period (Figure 3).


Pyrethrum spray catches: density of anopheles per room: during the pyrethrum spray catches, 547 anopheles were captured in Moïssala against 2 in Dembo for a total of 160 sprayed rooms per locality, i.e. an average density of 3.41 anopheles per room in Moïssala against 0.01 in Dembo. An coluzzii is by far the most frequent anopheles at rest during the day in houses in Moïssala, while in Dembo the frequency is equal to An funestus. In Moïssala, An funestus and An rufipes are present in small numbers in the houses but in Dembo, the results of the surveys show the absence of An rufipes (Table 1).


Sporozoite indices of endophilic fauna: considering the small number of An funestus and An rufipes captured, all individuals were subjected to the search for plasmodial infection. On the other hand, of the 547 An coluzzii collected, 343 were submitted to ELISA for infection detection and 23 were carriers of plasmodium sporozoite antigens, representing a sporozoite index of 6.70%. Two out of 10 An rufipes were infected with sporozoites, representing a sporozoite index of 20%. None of the 13 individuals in An funestus was found infected. In Dembo, none of the two collected mosquitoes were infected by plasmodium sporozoites (Table 4).



Discussion Up    Down

Effective malaria control is based on an integrated approach of several strategies [15-17]. For vector control, prevention of malaria transmission through the widespread use of insecticide-treated nets and indoor residual spraying is recommended [18]. First, knowledge of the sensitivity of malaria vector anopheles to insecticides and their biting behavior is required before measures can be deployed and post-deployment evaluation of these measures [19,20]. The objective of this study was to assess the impact of the indoor spraying campaign on malaria transmission in the eastern zone of the Moïssala health district after two cycles of bendiocarb spraying. This evaluation was carried out by measuring certain entomological parameters of malaria transmission using methods adapted to the study of vectors.


To better evaluate this campaign, these parameters should have been studied for a year. This would consider the seasonality of transmission and vector density. For example, the results of our study did not allow us to conclude on the degree of effectiveness of internal revenue service (IRS) in the short, medium and long term. Moreover, our results also did not allow us to conclude whether the difference in the specific composition between 2015 and 2016 is related to IRS. However, the results obtained could be used as reliable scientific databases for future vector control planning. The IRS coverage rate was over 85%, which reflects a high level of support from the local population. According to WHO, for IRS to have a positive impact on transmission, a coverage rate of 80% must be achieved. In 2015, five species of anopheles were identified in the Moïssala Health District (An gambiae sl, An rufipes, An nili, An pharoensis and An ziemanni), while the 2016 results reported only three species: An gambiae sl, An rufipes and An funestus with a prevalence of An coluzzii. These results are comparable to those obtained by Kerah-Hinzoumbé C et al. [8] in Goulmoun, Diarra et al. [9] in Douguia in Chad and Saotoing et al. [21] in Maroua in Cameroon where An gambiae predominated with 84.5%, 87.5% and 81.79% respectively during human landing catches and pyrethrum spray catches.


These results could be explained by the similarity of these areas in geoclimatic and ecological terms. The anophelian human landing catches density is 8.38 bites/man/night in outdoor and 10.06 bits/man/night in indoor in Moïssala and zero in Dembo. Moïssala's results are similar to those obtained by Himeidan et al. [22] in Sudan, Dossou Yovo et al. [23] in Bouaké, Ivory coast, who reported human landing catches density of 8.82 bite/man/year in Um Salala and 8.9 bite/man/night respectively. Dembo's results (0 bites/man/night) would be related to the spray effect. On the other hand, Kerah et al. [8] in Goulmoun (Bongor) in Chad reported a significantly higher anophelian human landing catches density of 67 bite/man/night. The density of endophilic mosquitoes is 3.41 anopheles per room in Moïssala and 0.01 anopheles in Dembo. Similar results were reported by Keïta et al. [24] along the Niger river in Mali where densities were low in the sprayed huts and higher in the control huts. The difference in densities between Dembo and Moïssala is believed to be linked to the widespread use of insecticide-treated mosquito nets and, for Dembo, coupled with indoor residual spraying. The entomological comparison of the treated area with the untreated area in this study confirms the results that indoor spraying leads to a decrease in vector density and vectors host-seeking [25,26]. This statement, even if it is not shared by some authors [27,28], is confirmed during this survey and seems relevant for malaria prevention even in areas of permanent transmission.


Concerning this parameter, transmission in the control area is about 0.63 infected bites per man per night outdoor and 0.75 indoor. However, it is zero in the treated area. The human biting rate of Anopheles indoors (54.58%) is higher than outdoors (45.42%). This study corroborates those of Kerah et al. [8], Doannio et al. [29] in Ivory coast and Coz and Brengues [30], in Burkina Faso, who observed a rate of human lading catches of 55.8% respectively, significantly higher inside than outside the home.


In Moïssala, anophelian host-seeking behaviour starts from 6 p.m. and continues throughout the night both inside and outside the houses. In both cases, a high rate of bite is observed between 8 p.m. and 5 a.m. However, the maximum is obtained inside between 2 a.m. and 4 a.m. and only decreases significantly after 4 hours. Outside the houses, a high rate was reached earlier, between 10 p.m. to 11 p.m. and the second between midnight to 1 a.m. This intense activity of anopheles between 8 p.m. to 4 a.m. had already been reported previously in some studies [29,31] while others place it after the second half of the night [32]. These results confirm that the host-seeking cycle has not been altered by the mere use of nets in absence of spraying. The biting rate decreases from 2 a.m. outside compared to inside. This decrease in host-seeking would be due to the drop of temperature in December.


Malaria transmission in the Moïssala Health District is due to 2 vectors: An coluzzii which has been found infected on human landing catches inside (10.06%) and outside (8.38%) as well as in pyrethrum spray catches (6.70%) and An rufipes. Out of 10 An rufipes captured in the pyrethrum spray catches and analyzed by ELISA CSP, 2 were positive, i.e. 20%. This result does not make An rufipes a secondary vector [11,33] but an excellent one to consider in the transmission of malaria to Moïssala. Our results according to which An rufipes is captured at rest in the rooms and on human bait are similar to those observed in Dielmo in Senegal [34] and Dori in Burkina Faso [35]. However, investigations incriminating this species in transmission are rare [36]. Although An funestus is, with An arabiensis, a major vector of malaria in Chad, this species plays no role in the transmission of malaria to Moïssala.



Conclusion Up    Down

The indoor residual spraying campaign in the eastern zone of the Moïssala Health District has led to the collapse of the density and host-seeking behavior of malaria vectors. However, its evaluation over a short period is not sufficient to assess the impact of malaria transmission in this stable and endemic malaria zone. The long-term effectiveness of the indoor residual spraying campaign on malaria vectors and transmission will only be assessed after several years of transmission. In addition, the use of mosquito nets and other control measures should be considered in this assessment.

What is known about this topic

  • Malaria is an endemic vector-borne disease in the Sudano-Guinean zone;
  • Insecticide-treated nets are effective against malaria transmission.

What this study adds

  • Bendiocarb used for indoor residual spraying reduces mosquito density and prevents malaria transmission;
  • Intra-home spraying can be used in addition to insecticide-treated nets for effective malaria control.



Competing interests Up    Down

The authors declare no competing interest.



Authors' contributions Up    Down

CKH conceived, analyzed the data and coordinated the study; IDK conceived, conducted the study, analyzed the data and drafted the manuscript; AMO, MT, ANF, EYK, BAA, DB and PM conducted the study and reviewed the manuscript. All the authors have read and agreed to the final manuscripts.



Acknowledgments Up    Down

This study was carried out with the financial support of the non-governmental organization Médecins Sans Frontière France. We would like to thank the organization very much.



Tables and figures Up    Down

Table 1: number of mosquitoes collected per site and per collection method

Table 2: number of species per collection station

Table 3: sporozoite indexes of indoor and outdoor the rooms

Table 4: sporozoite indexes of pyrethrum spray catches

Figure 1: location of study sites

Figure 2: cycle of time human landing indoor and outdoor the rooms in Moïssala

Figure 3: hourly infection rates



References Up    Down

  1. World Health Organization. Rapport 2020 sur le paludisme dans le monde. 2020. Accessed on 16th January 2021.

  2. World Health Organization. Eradication du paludisme. Conseil Exécutif, Cent quarante et unième session. 2018.

  3. World Health Organization. United Arab Emirates certified malaria free. Wkly Epidemiol Rec. 2007 Jan 26;82(4):30-2. PubMed | Google Scholar

  4. Programme National de Lutte contre le Paludisme. Rapport annuel d´activité. N´Djaména. 2020.

  5. Avocksouma DA, Sosso H, Donan-Gouni I, N´Detibaye A, Mbodou A, Souleingar N. Impact socioéconomique du paludisme au Tchad. 2002;32.

  6. Saugrain J, Taupplieb R. Anophélisme sans paludisme au nord Tchad. Bulletin de la Société de Pathologie Exotique. 1960;53(3):150-152. Google Scholar

  7. Wilson B. Malaria incidence in central and south Africa. In: malariology. A comprehensive survey of all aspects of this group of diseases from a global standpoint. Philadelphia, London, W.B. Saunders Company. 1949.

  8. Kerah-Hinzoumbé C, Mallaye P, Nkondjio CA, Donan-Gouni I, Awono-Ambene P, Samè-Ekobo A et al. Malaria vectors and transmission dynamics in Goulmoun, a rural city in south-western Chad. BMC Infect Dis. 2009;9:71. PubMed | Google Scholar

  9. Diarra AZ, Dabo A, Saye R, Coulibaly D, Guindo MA, Sagara I et al. Entomological and parasitological parameters of malaria transmission in Douguia, Chad. Med Sante Trop. 2017 Aug 1;27(3):253-259. PubMed | Google Scholar

  10. Le Goff G, Carnevale P, Robert V. Comparaison des captures sur homme et aux pièges lumineux CDC pour l´échantillonnage des moustiques et l´évaluation de la transmission du paludisme au Sud-Cameroun. Ann Soc Belge Med Trop. 1993;73:55-60. Google Scholar

  11. Gillies MT, De Meillon B. The anophelinae of Africa south of the Sahara (Ethiopian zoogeographical region). Publication of the South African Institute for Medical Research. 1968;54:343. Google Scholar

  12. Burkot TR, Williams JL, Schneider I. Identification of plasmodium falciparum-infected mosquitoes by a double antibody enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 1984;33(5):783-8. PubMed | Google Scholar

  13. Wirtz RA, Zavala F, Charoenvit Y, Campbell GH, Burkot TR, Schneider I et al. Comparative testing of plasmodium falciparum sporozoite monoclonal antibodies for ELISA development. Bull World Health Organ. 1987;65(1):39-45. PubMed

  14. Santolamazza F, Calzetta M, Etang J, Barrese E, Dia I, Caccone A et al. Distribution of knock-down resistance mutations in anopheles gambiae molecular forms in west and west-central Africa. Malar J. 2008;7:74. PubMed | Google Scholar

  15. Organisation Mondiale de la Santé. Stratégie technique mondiale de lutte contre le Paludisme 2016-2030. 2015;39. Google Scholar

  16. World Health Organization. Recommendation: intermittent preventive treatment of malaria in pregnancy using sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine (IPTpSP). 2012.

  17. World Health Organization. Achieving universal coverage with long-lasting insecticidal nets in malaria control. 2017. Google Scholar

  18. World Health Organization. Action mondiale pour lutter contre les vecteurs 2017-2030. 2017.

  19. World Health Organization. Global plan for insecticide resistance management in malaria vectors. 2012. Google Scholar

  20. Najera JA, Zaim M. Malaria vector control: decision making criteria and procedures for judicious use of insecticides. Geneva, WHO, document World Health Organization. 2003. Google Scholar

  21. Saotoing P, Fohouo-Tchuenguem FN, Njan Nlôga AM. Enquête entomologique sur la faune culicidienne de la ville de Maroua, région de l´Extrême Nord Cameroun. International Journal of Innovation and Applied Studies. 2014;9(1):438-448. Google Scholar

  22. Himeidan YE, Elzaki MM, Kweka EJ, Ibrahim M, Elhassan IM. Pattern of malaria transmission along the Rahad River Basin, Eastern Sudan. Parasit Vectors. 2011 Jun 16;4:109. PubMed | Google Scholar

  23. Dossou-Yovo J, Doannio JMC, Diarrassouba S, Chauvancy G. The impact of rice fields on the transmission of malaria in Bouaké, Côte d´Ivoire. Bulletin de la Societe de Pathologie Exotique. 1998;91(4):327-333. Google Scholar

  24. Keïta K, Keïta M, Sogoba N, Yaro AS, Sangaré D, Keïta A et al. Evaluation de l´impact d´une pulvérisation intra-domiciliaire en saison sèche sur la transmission du paludisme le long du fleuve Niger, Mali. Antropo. 2017;38:87-97. Google Scholar

  25. Barutwanayo M, Coosemans M, Delacollette C, Bisore S, Mpitabakana P, Seruzingo D. La lutte contre les vecteurs du paludisme dans le cadre d´un projet de développement rural au Burundi. Ann Soc Belge Méd Trop. 1991;71(suppl 1):113-125. Google Scholar

  26. Cot M, Brutus L, Le Goff G, Rajaonarivelo V, Raveloson A. Comparison of lambda-cyhalothrin and DDt house-spraying for malaria control on the western slopes of Madagascar highlands. Parasite. 2001 Dec;8(4):309-16. PubMed

  27. Robert V, Trape J-F. Lutter contre le paludisme en réduisant sa transmission: présentation de la controverse. Médecine/sciences. 1997;5(13):678-82. Google Scholar

  28. Trape J-F, Rogier C. Combating malaria morbidity and mortality by reducing transmission. Parasitol Today. 1996 Jun;12(6):236-40. PubMed | Google Scholar

  29. Doannio JMC, Dossou-Yovo J, Diarrassouba S, Rakotondraibé ME, Chauvancy G, Chandre F et al. Malaria transmission in the rice growing area of Kafine village, Côte d´Ivoire. Exot. 2002;95(1):11-16.

  30. Coz J, Brengues J. Le complexe anopheles gambiae et l´épidémiologie du paludisme et de la filariose de Bancroft en Afrique de l´Ouest. Méd Afr Noire. 1967;6:301-303. Google Scholar

  31. Zoulani A, Carnevale P, Penchenier L. Influence des moustiquaires imprégnées de deltaméthrine sur le cycle d'agressivité d'anopheles gambiae à Djoumouna, Congo. Ann Soc Belg Méd Trop. 1994;74(2):83-91. PubMed | Google Scholar

  32. Konan YL, Koné AB, Doannio JMC, Fofana D, Odehouri-Koudou P. Malaria transmission in Tiassalékro, a irrigated rice growing village situated in the South forest area of Côte d´Ivoire. Bull Soc Pathol Exot. 2009;102(1):26-30. PubMed | Google Scholar

  33. Hamon J, Mouchet J. Les vecteurs secondaires du paludisme humain en Afrique. Médecine Tropicale. 1996;643-660. Google Scholar

  34. Hamon J, Coz J, Sales S, Ouedraogo CS. Etudes entomologiques sur la transmission du paludisme humain dans une zone de steppe boisée, la région de Dori (République de Haute-Volta). Bulletin de l'IFAN T XXVII. 1965. Google Scholar

  35. Konate L, Diagne N, Brahimi K, Faye O, Legros F, Rogier C et al. Vectors bionomics and transmission of plasmodium falciparum P malariae and P ovale in a Sudan Savanna area of West Africa (Dielmo, Senegal). Parasite. 1994;1:325-333.

  36. Holstein M. Un nouveau vecteur du paludisme en AOF: Anopheles rufipes Gough 1910. Office de la Recherche Scientifique d´Outre-Mer. Entomologie Médicale et Vétérinaire. 1949:379. Google Scholar































An entomological survey in the Sudanese Guinean environmental transition zone after indoor residual spraying, Chad


An entomological survey in the Sudanese Guinean environmental transition zone after indoor residual spraying, Chad


An entomological survey in the Sudanese Guinean environmental transition zone after indoor residual spraying, Chad