Case series | Volume 38, Article 141, 08 Feb 2021 | 10.11604/pamj.2021.38.141.22884

Constrictive pericarditis: 21 years´ experience and review of literature

Taamallah Karima, Ben Zaied Nesrine, Lahdhili Hatem, Ben Omrane Skander, Denguir Raouf, Chenik Selim

Corresponding author: Taamallah Karima, Department of Cardiac Surgery, Military Hospital of Tunis, Tunis, Tunisia

Received: 16 Apr 2020 - Accepted: 26 Apr 2020 - Published: 08 Feb 2021

Domain: Cardiology

Keywords: Constrictive pericarditis, pericardiotomy, tuberculosis, echocardiography, prognosis

©Taamallah Karima et al. Pan African Medical Journal (ISSN: 1937-8688). This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution International 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Cite this article: Taamallah Karima et al. Constrictive pericarditis: 21 years´ experience and review of literature. Pan African Medical Journal. 2021;38:141. [doi: 10.11604/pamj.2021.38.141.22884]

Available online at: https://www.panafrican-med-journal.com/content/article/38/141/full

Home | Volume 38 | Article number 141

Case series

Constrictive pericarditis: 21 years´ experience and review of literature

Constrictive pericarditis: 21 years´ experience and review of literature

Taamallah Karima1,&, Ben Zaied Nesrine1, Lahdhili Hatem1, Ben Omrane Skander2, Denguir Raouf2, Chenik Selim1

 

1Department of Cardiac Surgery, Military Hospital of Tunis, Tunis, Tunisia, 2Department of Cardiac Surgery, La Rabta Hospital, Tunis, Tunisia

 

 

&Corresponding author
Taamallah Karima, Department of Cardiac Surgery, Military Hospital of Tunis, Tunis, Tunisia

 

 

Abstract

To the best of our knowledge there are no publications about Tunisian experience in constrictive pericarditis (CP); the aim of this study was therefore to review our twenty one years experience in terms of clinical and surgical outcomes and risk factors of death after pericardiectomy. An analytic bicentric and retrospective study carried out on 25 patients (20 male) with CP underwent pericardiectomy, collected over a 21-years period. The mean age was 40.46±16.74 years [7.5-72]. The commonest comorbid factor was tabagism (52%). The most common etiology was tuberculosis (n=11,44%). Dyspnea was the most common functional symptom (n=21, 84%). Pericardiectomy was performed in all our patients within 2.9±3.19 months after confirmation of diagnosis. It was subtotal in 96% of cases. The commonst postoperative complications are pleural effusion (20%). Dyspnea was regressed within 1.8 months in 80% of cases and clinical signs of right heart failure within a mean duration of 1.62 months in 53% of cases. Perioperative mortality was 12% (3 deaths), late mortality was 4% (1 patient). Cardiopulmonary bypass, NYHA over class II and right ventricular dysfunction are the prognostic factors of mortality (p= 0.001, 0.046, 0.019). Tuberculosis as etiology of CP had no impact on mortality. CP is a rare disease, with non-specific clinical signs. Pericardiectomy is effective with a significant improvement of the functional status of patients and favorable outcome at short and long term nevertheless hospital mortality is not negligible and depends on many factors.

 

 

Introduction    Down

Chronic constrictive pericarditis (CP) is a serious disease fortunately rare accounting for approximately 0.5 to 2% of heart disease and 0.6% of interventions in cardiovascular surgery department. IT is caracterized by constriction and adiastolia [1,2]. Symptomatology of CP is not specific, making diagnosis not always easy, it is dominated by right heart failure, CP is occasionally confused with hepatic cirrhosis or furthermore restrictive cardiomyopathy or endomyocardial fibrosis making necessary the use of many complementary examinations to perform the diagnosis [3,4]. Doppler echocardiography and cardiac catheterization are the cornerstone in the diagnostic work-up, but use of multimodality cardiac imaging in particular cardiac computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is often necessary to differentiate between CP and restrictive myocardiopathy which represent the main differential diagnosis. Medical treatment is only symptomatic to prepare the patient for surgery, which represents the only radical treatment for CP. The surgical intervention consists of a pericardiectomy. A significant improvement of symptoms was observed in the immediate operative period in some series [5].There are no publications and data on CP in Tunisia, The aim of this study was to describe the epidemiological, clinical, paraclinical and therapeutic characteristics of CP and identify post-operative prognostic factors, as well as short-term and long-term evolution after pericardiectomy.

 

 

Methods Up    Down

An analytic, longitudinal and retrospective bicentric study, including 25 cases of chronic constrictive pericarditis, collected over a period of 21 years from November 1994 to May 2015. Included in this study all patients underwent pericardiectomy for CP. Pericarditis etiology was determined by the patient´s history. The data were collected from medical records by referring to an operating sheet that we established at the start of the study. Epidemiological data, aetiology of CP, functional signs, data from physical examination, data from additional tests (electrocardiogram, radiography thoracic and cardiac imaging data) the time interval between symptoms and diagnosis (time elapsed between the onset of symptoms and diagnosis). Biological data were collected. We have specified the time interval between diagnosis and surgery (the time elapsed between the diagnosis and the surgical treatment). Informations about the surgical intervention were collected. Patient´s clinical and paraclinical data during in hospital period and during follow-up were noted. Statistical study: all of the continuous variables are expressed as mean ± SD and the categorical variables as percentages. the Anova test or the Mann-Whitney test were used for the quantitative variables and the Fisher Exact test for the qualitative variables. A p value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

 

 

Results Up    Down

The mean age of our patients was 40.46 ± 16.74 years (7.5-72 years). Sex ratio at 4 (20 male, 5 female). Smoking was the most frequently concomitant cardiovascular risk factors (n=13, 52%), comorbidities are summarized in Table 1. Tuberculosis was observed in nearly the half of the cases (n = 11; 44%). Active tuberculosis contemporary with CP was found in two patients (8%). In nine patients, a history of confirmed tuberculosis was found but negativation of all tests confirming tuberculosis. Idiopathic CP in eight patients (32%). post-cardiotomy CP occurs after valve replacement in three patients (12%), the time between surgery and the onset of signs of CP was respectively 2 years, 4 years and 5 years. Viral pericarditis in two patients (8%) and Mulibrey's nanism in one patient (4%). We have no post-radiation CP. The mean time between symptoms and diagnosis was 17.05 ± 24.20 months (0.5-72 months). In nine patients (36%) the diagnosis was performed in the first six months after the onset of symptoms. Dyspnea was the most frequent symptom, found in 21 patients (84%) with predominantly NYHA class II (n=10, 40%). NYHA class III or IV dyspnea was noted in seven patients (28%), all symptoms are listed in table2.

The most frequent physical sign was hepatomegaly, jugular venous distension, peripheral edema, hepatojugular reflux and ascites. Blood pressure was normal in all patients, pulsus paradoxus was not found in any patient (Table 2). Preoperative electrocardiogramm was abnormal in most patients (n = 24, 96%). The most frequent electrical sign was diffuse repolarization disorders (48% n = 12) followed by low voltage (36% n = 9). Three patients (12%) had a right branch block. Atrial fibrillation (AF) was found in seven patients (28%) and flutter in two patients (8%). Chest x-ray revealed pericardial calcifications in eleven patients (44%), cardiomegaly in six patients (24%) and a pleural effusion in six patients (24%). Mean plasma creatinine level was 73.9± 16.48 mol/L, mean creatinine clearance was 115±17.38 ml/min (89, 5-148). Abnormal liver function tests in 13 patients (52%), hepatic cirrhosis was observed in two patients, Laboratory tets anomalous are listed in Table 3. On transthoracic echocardiography (TTE), biatrial dilation was the most frequent sign followed by pericardial thickening, septum notch and inferior vena cava plethora. Right ventricular (RV) dysfunction was frequent observed in 10 patients (40%), left ventricular (LV) dysfonction was noted in three patients (ejection fraction respectively 40, 40 and 32%), and Mean LV ejection fraction was 53.6±12.9%. In Doppler study E/A ratio > 0.8 was present in all patients and respiration-related variation of mitral inflow velocities was frequent present in 60% of patients, echocardiographic data are detailled in Table 4. Cardiac catheterization was performed in 21 patients (84%), A Dip- and-plateau (square root sign) and equalization of end diastolic pressures in right and left cardiac chambers were found in all patients. Pressure in different cardiac chambres are listed in Table 5. Cardiac computed tomography (CT) was performed in 12 patients (48%). The commonest abnormalities were pericardial calcification noted in seven patients, pleural effusion in six patients, and pericardial thickening in four patients. Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was performed in five other patients (20%). Pericardial thickening was observed in five patients and pericardial calcifications in two patients.

Regarding medical treatment prior to surgery, 23 patients (92%) were on diuretics, eleven patients (44%) were on vitamin- K antagonist treatment (patients with supraventricular rhythm disturbances and with valvular heart prosthetic). Three patients (12%) had undergone one previous sternotomy for valvular replacment. Pericardiectomy was performed in all our patients within 2.9 ± 3.19 months, it was subtotal in 96% of cases (n = 24) and partial in only one patient. The midline sternotomy was performed in all patients. Cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) support was necessary in two patients (8%) because major bleeding for one and a tricuspid annuloplasty of De Vega for tricuspid insufficiency for the other. No other Concomitant cardiac surgical procedures performed at the same time as pericardiectomy. CPB support time was respectively 33 min and 46 min. Transfusion was necessary in seven patients (28%), average transfusion requirements are five red bood cell concentrates, six fresh frozen plasma and nine platelet concentrats.The use of catecholamines was necessary in 10 patients (40%). Extubation was accomplished the first postoperative day in 17 patients (68%). Mean length of stay in the intensive care unit was 5.86 ± 2.02 days (1-36 days). Mean time spent with a chest drain in place was 4.53±6.125 days (1-26 days). The mean length of hospital stay was 26.27 ± 14.23 days. Anatomopathological study of pericardium was performed in 16 patients (64%). A fibrotic aspect was observed in 14 patients and an inflammatory aspect in two patients. There were no specific signs of malignancy or tuberculosis.

The most frequent postoperative complications were pleural effusion requiring surgical drainage in five patients (20%) and bleeding noted in four patients (16%) (Hemopericardium in two patients, hemomediastinum in one patient, and hemothorax with respiratory distress in one patient, in these patients reoperation was necessary) and low cardiac output observed in three patients (12%). Postoperative AF was noted in one patient (4%) (Table 6). Inhospital mortality was 12%: three early postoperative deaths because of a low cardiac output and severe RV dysfunction. Among the 22 patients who survived, 17 patients were follow up from 14 months to 21 years (mean average follow up=5.67 years), we lost five patients to follow-up. Among survivors a regression of dyspnea was observed within 1.8 months in 82% of patients (n=14). There was no death during the year after the pericardiectomy, but during follow-up, one patient (4%) died 2 years after pericardiectomy, the cause of death was is worsening of an hepatic cirrhosis existing before pericardiectomy. Using univariate statistical analysis significant risk factors for global mortality (in-hospital and late mortality regrouped) included NYHA class over II (classes III and IV regrouped) (p=0.046) and right ventricular dysfunction on transthoracic echocardiogrphy (TTE) (p = 0.023). CPB support use was a risk factor for in-hospital (p=0.003) and global mortality (p=0.001). Tuberculosis as aetiology does not influence in-hospital and late mortality (Table 7).

 

 

Discussion Up    Down

The age of patients with CP varies from one study to another it rage between 40 and 66 years [4,6-9]. In our study disease affects young patients, same finding are reported by Lin et al. [9] and Ghavidel et al. [4] (mean age respectively at 40.1±15.5 and 46.6±14.9 years). Younger age (mean 28.8±10.44 years) was reported by Yangui Angate et al. [10]. In this study the aetiology of pericarditis was tuberculosis in 99% of cases. In Western countries the average age of discovery of CP is in the fifth and sixth decades as shown by Busch et al. [6], Kang et al. [7] and Tokuda et al. [8]. This difference could be explained by the difference in etiologies between countries. In our study only one patient was a child aged seven years and six months (Mulibrey nanism). Yangui-angate et al. [10] had also children among their patients. According to literature, CP affects mainly adults and seems rare in childhood and exceptional in infants [11,12], explained by the etiologies of CP which predominate in adults and which are uncommon in children. A male predominance is noted in our study and in the most of studies without obvious explanation [6,9]. In our study, tuberculous and idiopathic CP were the most common. Eleven patients (44%) had tuberculous CP, authors from Asian countries, Africa, Iran and South Africa have reported tuberculosis as cause of CP in 22.2% to 91% of cases. Tuberculosis is responsible of early or late pericardial constriction, which occurs between a few months and several years [10,13-18] while in western countries tuberculous CP is uncommon and main etiologies are : post-surgical and post radiation CP predominating in elderly [19].

Confirmation of tuberculosis origin of the CP is not always obvious. In the study by Mutyaba et al. [18], the tuberculosis was retained as the cause of constriction in 90.9% of patients but was only confirmed in 32.7% cases explained by the occurrence of tuberculous pericardial constriction much later after the active pulmonary tuberculosis infection or the ineffectiveness of the treatment of pulmonary tuberculosis[9]. According to some studies [18,20-22], the most common causes of pericardial constriction were idiopathic or viral (42-49%), post-cardiotomy (11-37%), post-radiation (9 -31%), connectivitis (3-7%), post-infectious including tuberculosis (3-6%) and other uncommun causes (<10%) including neoplasia, thoracic trauma, uremic pericarditis, asbestosis, sarcoidosis and the administration of certain drugs. Constrictive pericarditis post-cardiotomy is common in Western countries, it occur after a few months to a few years after any cardiac surgery, particularly valve replacement and coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) [23,24]. The occurrence of constriction could be explained by post-operative hemorrhage and the use of foreign material during the procedure, which causes a chronic inflammatory reaction and the onset of fibrosis [3]. This etiology is relatively rare in our study. Constrictive pericarditis post-radiation is also a common cause of pericardial constriction in Western countries. Pericardial constriction can occur 5 to 10 years after radiotherapy and is most often associated with pancarditis [3,20,25]. None of our patients had a history of radiation therapy.

Idiopathic CP is frequent in our study and in the literature [20-22]. According to some authors, it could be explained by anterior viral pericarditis without microbiological evidence [3]. Etiology of constrictive pericarditis influences not only short-term but also long term outcome following pericardiectomy. Idiopathic and inflammatory pathogenesis was associated with the best in-hospital and long-term survival rates, while radiation-induced constrictive pericarditis showed very poor prognosis [26]. Cardiac involvement is the most serious disease during Mulibrey nanism, characterized by pericardial constriction or myocardial hypertrophy with fibrosis [27]. Mulibrey nanism is a rare cause of CP. Only one of our patients presented a CP as part of Mulibrey nanism. Due to the scarcity of the disease and non-specific symptoms, there is often a delay in diagnosis. The time between onset of symptoms and diagnosis was long in our study and other studies, it was 19.7 ± 6 months in the study of Nataf et al. [28]. In a more recent study, the diagnosis was made within six months in 57.7% of patients, between six and 12 months in 17.5% of patients and more than 12 months in 25.8% of patients [6]. Constrictive pericarditis should be suspected in any patient for whom the severity of heart failure is disproportional to the degree of myocardial dysfunction. The commonest symptom is dyspnea, literature findings are similar to ours [3, 4,17]. Constrictive pericarditis can be asymptomatic, which is the case of one of our patients, a similar case was published by Sheth AA. et al. it was a 28 year old man in whom a CP was discovered in a context of liver dysfunction [29]. The most common physical signs described in the literature are hepatomegaly (23.4%-100%), jugular venous distension (52%-65%), ascites (8.9%-90%) peripheral edema (8,9%-84%). Unilateral or bilateral pleural effusions are often associated (35% to 79.3%) [4,9,17,18,21,30,31], these results are similar to ones we found. The paradoxical pulse of Kussmaul is an evocative physical sign, it was found in 63.6% in the series of Mutyaba et al. [18], 22% in the series of Lin et al. [9], 19% in the series of Ling et al. [21] and 16% in the series of Cameron et al. [20]. It has not been noted in our patients.

A supraventricular arrhythmia was found in 36% of our patients which is in concordance with kumawat et al. [32] who found AF in 34.8% of their patients. A less AF (16%) was found by Ling et al.[21]. In our patients a low voltage was frequent and it is frequently found in several studies such as those of Ling et al. (27%), Bashi et al (75%) and Mutyaba et al. (63.6%) [18,21,31]. Concerning chest x-ray, Cardiac calcifications were frequent (44%) in our patients which is close to the literature, Kumawat [32] noted them in 37% of their patients and Angate et al (10) in 50% of cases. it is important to note that the presence of calcifications reflect the duration more than the cause of the disease [31]. Pleural effusion can be associated in 60% of cases [33]. Echocardiography is the most useful initial investigation. Our echocardiographic findings are consistent with those of the literature. Pericardial thickening was noted in 75% of the cases of Lin et al. and in 42% of the cases in of Bashi et al. [9,31]. According to Ling et al. [34], the sensitivity of transthoracic echocardiography for the detection of pericardial thickening is only 46%. This low sensitivity of detecting thickening is explained by the technical limitations of TTE as well as the inhomogenous thickening of the pericardium. The inferior vena cava plethora is an interesting sign to make the diagnosis of CP, according to some authors constriction unlikely if not dilated inferior vena cava and E/A ratio not superior to 0.8 [35]. In our study, patients without dilation of the inferior vena cava were on a high dose of diuretic. Biatrial dilation is the most common sign found in our patients, it is a very suggestive but not very sensitive sign [36]. The Doppler analysis is a main exploration time allowing not only to highlight the signs of constriction but also to differentiate CP from restrictive myocardiopathy [37]. Variation in mitral inflow velocities observed in our patients is a very sensitive sign of pericardial constriction but also not specific of CP. Velocities in mitral annulus in tissue doppler are normal during CP while decreased in restrictive myocardiopathy. Tissue Doppler allows differentiation between these two disease with a sensitivity of 95% and a specificity of 96% for CP [38]. It was only measured in four of our patients, explained by the unavailability of this technique at the time of performing echocardiography and was greater than 7 cm/s in all cases. The dip-and-plateau present in one quarter of our patients is an evocative but not specific sign. RV dysfunction is common in our patients. The RV systolic function is significantly altered during CP [39]. Epicardial inflammation and fibrosis can directly affect myocardial contractility and lead to the formation of adhesions between the myocardium and the parietal pericardium. These adhesions can both reduce the preoperative RV systolic performance and lead to additional peroperative myocardial damage [40]. Prolonged and progressive constriction can lead to RV myocardial atrophy [41,42].

Cardiac catheterization can be used when echocardiography, and multimodality cardiac imaging provide equivocal results or when a mixed cardiac pathology requires further evaluation, it is a sensitive (100%) and specific (97%) examination for the diagnosis of CP allowing definitive confirmation of the diagnosis and formally elimination of a right or a bilateral endomyocardial fibrosis and a restrictive myocardiopathy and evaluation of the severity of coexisting valvular lesions [43,44]. Cardiac catheterization was performed in 84% of our cases, dip-and-plateau and adiaslia was found in all patients, some results are published by McCaughan et al. [45], in the Busch´s study dip-and-plateau was noted in 77 % of cases [6]. The average pressure measured in heart chambers of our patients was consistent with those of other studies it was around 20 mmHg. The subtotal pericardiectomy was the preferred intervention performed in all our patient. Chowdhury et al. [46] , were demonstrated that subtotal pericardiectomy was associated with lower perioperative mortality, less frequent postoperative low flow syndrome, earlier improvement of hemodynamic state allowing better long-term survival. Primary use of Cardiopulmonary bypass support is not recommended due to increased diffuse bleeding during pericardial resection following systemic heparinization. Indeed, the use of Cardiopulmonary bypass support should only be necessary if other coexisting cardiac lesions will be operating in same time or in the event of the occurrence of hemorrhagic lesions during the procedure which is the case for our two patients. There is no link between the type of operation (subtotal or partial pericardiectomy) and the indication for the use of Cardiopulmonary bypass support [28,46,47]. In our study, the perioperative mortality rate was 12% which is in line with previous cohorts in which mortality was between 6.1% and 14% [20-22,26,46,48]. In these studies the most frequent cause of early death was a low cardiac output [1,8], which is noted in our patients. The commonest complications observed by Bicer et al.[17] where pleural effusion (12.8%) followed by pulmonary infection (8.5% ), in the study of Lin et al. [9] pleural effusion was found in 47% of cases followed by low cardiac output in 31 % of cases. In other studies, acute renal failure, AF and low cardiac syndrome were the most common complications after pericardiectomy [4,8,30]. The most common post-operative rhythm and conduction disorder are AF and atrioventricular block requiring implantation of pacemaker. Post-pericardiectomy AF was noted in 8.4% of patients of Tokuda et al. [8] and in 4% of cases in our study. In the study by Bush et al. [6] Atrioventricular block was noted in 7.2% of patients, this complication was uncommon in patients published by Tokuda et al. (0.6%) [8], and it was not noted in our series.

Reoperation was inevitable in two cases (8%) of our series in order to evacuate a hemomediastinum for one and a hemothorax for the other. In litterature, bleeding was the causes of reopertion in 2.1% to 19.6% of cases [6,8,17]. According to several studies, the results of the pericardiectomy are satisfactory, since a significant improvement in the symptoms is observed in more than 80% of the patients [5,10,17,46]. Our results are in concordance with literature, a regression of dyspnea was observed within 1.8 months in 82% of patients. During the first post-operative year, clinical signs of right heart failure disappeared in 53% of our patients within a mean duration of 1.62 months, this was noted in 80% of the patients beyond the first year postoperative. During follow-up, no recurrence of CP was noted. The functional improvement obtained after pericardiectomy is maintained in long-term, except in certain cases. In Ling's study, signs of heart failure recurred within an average of 7.1 months in 31% of patients, despite radical surgery [21]. The reappearance of signs of right heart failure after pericardiectomy may be related to incomplete pericardial decortication, extension of pericardial calcifications to the myocardium, and myopericardial involvement by the same pathological process as radiotherapy [21,49]. Regarding the evolution of echocardiographic signs during the first post-operative year, the disappearance of constriction was noted in all patients (100%). A recent study [50] comparing the preoperative and postoperative echocardiography demonstrated a significant reduction in the congestion of the inferior vena cava from 100% to 15% of cases, a reduction in the size of the left atrium from 39.33 ± 10.52 mm to 34.45±10.08 mm, a reduction in the paradoxical septum and respiratory variations in mitral inflow velocity. In our patients with preoperative RV dysfunction, improvement in RV function was noted in a single patient within 14 months. Improvement in the RV function after surgery occurs in a minority of patients, this could be explained by a high frequency of myocardial involvement and a possible additional injury during the intervention [40]. After a pericardiectomy, an abrupt increase in filling volume can lead to acute RV dilation and dysfunction [40]. post-pericardiectomy RV dysfunction may also result from ischemia caused by an imbalance between supply and need for oxygen to the RV myocardium due to the sudden increase in RV wall tension by his extension after pericardiectomy.

Independent predictors of late survival were age, NYHA class, previous radiation, LV dysfunction, hepatomegaly, cirrhosis,hyponatremia, need of high doses of diuretics, rise of bilirubin´s level [9,10,18,21,22,26,49]. Previous radiotherapy was the most powerful predictor of all outcome measures [26]. In our study the use of CPB is the only predictor of in-hospital mortality this result is consistent with those found in other studies [8]. Right Ventricular dysfunction on echocardiography was a predictor of global mortality, which is contradictory to the results published by Choudry et al. [40] which showed that the function of RV is significantly impaired during CP but this RV dysfunction does not influence long-term results after pericardiectomy [21]. Fonctionnal class NYHA over classII is a risk factor for mortality witch is in line with a lot of studies demonstrating a correlation between the functional class and operative mortality [10,26].Tuberculosis as etiology of CP, had no impact on mortality which is in line with other studies [26]. This is the first study that relate a Tunisian experience on treating constrictive pericarditis. However, there were some limitations that warrant mention, because of the retrospective aspect of our study several clinical, and imaging data were missing from medical records and additional examination reports. Another important limitation is the small size of our sample despite a bicentric study explained by the low incidence of constrictive pericarditis resulting in restricted statistical analysis: therefore the results of the survival analysis could not be extended by multivariate analysis of the subgroups and therewhy we regrouped patients with in-hopital and late mortality to determine risk factors of mortality. A large-scale study is to be carried out in order to establish the prognosis of the CP.

 

 

Conclusion Up    Down

The particularity of our study is predominance of post-tuberculosis CP and frequency of RV dysfunction. Treatment of CP by pericardiectomy is effective with a significant improvement of patients´ functional status and favorable outcome at short and long term neverthless hospital mortality is not negligibe and depends on many factors.

What is known about this topic

  • Constrictive pericarditis is a rare and severe disease;
  • Constrictive pericarditis is difficult to diagnosis, usually with delayed diagnosis;
  • Pericardiectomy with complete decortication is the definitive treatment.

What this study adds

  • The first Tunisian study about constrictive pericarditis;
  • Particularities of our patients: Predominance of tuberculous pericarditis and frequency of right ventricular dysfunction associated with constrictive pericarditis;
  • from our study we reviewed literature data concerning clinical, paraclinical characteristics, the etiologies and the evolution of constrictive pericarditis after pericardiectomy and determine risk factors of mortality and verify if the tuberculous etiology influences the postoperative mortality of patients with constrictive pericarditis.

 

 

Competing interests Up    Down

The author declare no competing interests.

 

 

Authors' contributions Up    Down

Taamallah Karima: conception of the study, redaction. Ben Zaied Nesrine: contribution in redaction. Lahdhili Hatem: correction of the redaction. Ben Omrane Skander: correction of the redaction. Denguir Raouf: head of department of cardiac surgery, La Rabta Hospital of Tunisia. Chenik Selim: head of department of cardiac surgery, Military hospital of Tunisia.

 

 

Tables Up    Down

Table 1: patient´s comorbidities

Table 2: clinical signs

Table 3: laboratory tests

Table 4: echocardiographic signs

Table 5: cardiac catheterization

Table 6: post-operative complications

Table 7: risk factors of in hospital and global mortality

 

 

References Up    Down

  1. Thia A, Prunier F, Subay JB, Baufreton C, Geslin P, Furber A. Long term evolution of chronic constrictive pericarditis: a study of 56 patients. Arch Mal Coeur Vaiss. 2006; 99(9):775-80. PubMed | Google Scholar

  2. Myers RB, Spodick DH. Constrictive pericarditis: clinical and pathophysiologic characteristics. American Heart Journal. 1999; 138(2Pt 1):219-32. PubMed | Google Scholar

  3. El Khorb N, El Ouali L, Lahlou I, Ouaha L, Akoudad H. La pericardite chronique constrictive. MorJCardiol. 2012; 7:16-20. PubMed | Google Scholar

  4. Alireza Ghavidel A, Maziar Gholampour, Majid Kyavar, Yalda Mirmesdagh, Mohammad-Bagher Tabatabaie. Constrictiv pericarditis treated by surgery. TexHeartInstJ. 2012;39(2):199-205. PubMed | Google Scholar

  5. Richard Troughton , Craig Asher R, Allan Klein L. Pericarditis. The Lancet. 2004; 363(9410):717-27. PubMed | Google Scholar

  6. Busch C, Penov K, Amorim PA, Garbade J, Davierwala P, Schuler GC et al. Risk factors for mortality after pericardiectomy for chronic constrictive pericarditis in a large single-centre cohort. European journal of cardio-thoracic surgery : official journal of the European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery. 2015 Dec;48(6):e110-6. PubMed | Google Scholar

  7. Kang SH, Song JM, Kim M, Choo SJ, Chung CH, Kang DH et al. Prognostic predictors in pericardiectomy for chronic constrictive pericarditis. The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery. 2014 Feb; 147(2):598-605. PubMed | Google Scholar

  8. Yoshiyuki Tokuda, Hiroaki Miyata, Noboru Motomura, Yoshimori Araki, Hideki Oshima, Akihiko Usui et al. Outcome of pericardiectomy for constrictive pericarditis in Japan: a nationwide outcome study. The Annals of thoracic surgery. 2013 Aug; 96(2):571-6. PubMed | Google Scholar

  9. Yiyun Lin, Mi Zhou, Jian Xiao, Bin Wang, Zhinong Wang. Treating constrictive pericarditis in a chinese single-center study: a five-year experience. The Annals of thoracic surgery. 2012 Oct;94(4):1235-40. PubMed | Google Scholar

  10. Yangni-Angate KH, Tanauh Y, Meneas C, Diby F, Adoubi A, Diomande M. Surgical experience on chronic constrictive pericarditis in African setting: review of 35 years´ experience in Cote d´Ivoire. Cardiovasc Diagn Ther.2016;6(Suppl 1):S13-S19. PubMed | Google Scholar

  11. Ferreria Gomes SM FGJ, Morais N, Paz WS, Silveira FA. Constrictive chronic pericarditis in children. cardiol Young. 2001;11(2):210-13. PubMed | Google Scholar

  12. Demaria R FS, Racine N, Durrleman N,Albat B, Frapier JM et al. Péricardite chronique constrictive chez l'enfant africain: à propos d'un cas. Annales de cardiologie et d'angeiologie. 2001;50(6):312-5. PubMed | Google Scholar

  13. Paul EA, Hassan N. The Pericardium. In: Sabiston DC. Surgery of the Chest. 5th edition. Philadelphia: Saunders, 1990:1230-12492.

  14. Kirklin J, Barrat-Boyes B. Pericardial Disease In: Cardiac Surgery 3rd Edition. Philadelphia: Elsevier (USA). 2003:1779-95.

  15. Merle H, Angate A, Delormas Pet al. La Chirurgie Thoracique en Côte d´Ivoire. Afrique Medicale. 1961; 1:25-33.

  16. Mayosi BM, Burgess LJ, Doubell AF. Tuberculous pericarditis. Circulation.2005 Dec 6;112(23):3608-16. PubMed | Google Scholar

  17. Bicer M OB, Kan I,Yuksel A,Tok M,Senkaya I. Long-term outcomes of pericardiectomy for constrictive pericarditis. Journal of cardiothoracic surgery. 2015; 10:177. PubMed | Google Scholar

  18. Arthur Mutyaba K, Sarvesh Balkaran, Robert Cloete, Naude du Plessis, Motasim Badri, Johan Brink. Constrictive pericarditis requiring pericardiectomy at Groote Schuur Hospital, Cape Town, South Africa: causes and perioperative outcomes in the HIV era (1990-2012). The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery. 2014 Dec; 148(6):3058-65 e1. PubMed | Google Scholar

  19. Markus Schwefer, Rene Aschenbach, Jan Heidemann, Celia Mey, Harald Lapp. Constrictive pericarditis, still a diagnostic challenge: comprehensive review of clinical management. European journal of cardio-thoracic surgery: official journal of the European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery. 2009 Sep;36(3):502-10. PubMed | Google Scholar

  20. James Cameron, Stephen Oesterle N, John Baldwin C, William Hancock. The etiologic spectrum of constrictive pericarditis. The American journal of cardiology. 1987; 113:354-80. PubMed | Google Scholar

  21. Ling LH, Oh JK, Schaff HV, Danielson GK, Mahoney DW, Seward JB et al. Constrictive pericarditis in the modern era: evolving clinical Spectrum and impact on outcome after pericardectomy. Circulation. 1999; 100(13):1380-6. PubMed | Google Scholar

  22. Stefan Bertog C, Senthil Thambidorai K, Kapil Parakh, Paul Schoenhagen, Volkan Ozduran, Penny Houghtaling L et al. Constrictive pericarditis: etiology and cause-specific survival after pericardiectomy. Journal of the American College of Cardiology. 2004 Apr 21; 43(8):1445-52. PubMed | Google Scholar

  23. Anirban Kundu , Om Prakash Yadava, Arvind Prakash. Constrictive pericarditis following coronary artery bypass grafting. Indian Heart J. 2013 Mar-Apr; 65(2):198-200. PubMed | Google Scholar

  24. Kanakis C, Sheikh AI, Rosen KM. Conctrictive pericardial disease following mitral valve replacement. Chest. 1981 May;79(5):593-4. PubMed | Google Scholar

  25. Toyofuku M, Okimoto T, Tadehara F, Sumii K, Imazu M, Yamakido M et al. Cardiac Disease Late After Chest Radiotherapy for Hodgkin's Disease.Jpn Circ J. 1999 Oct;63(10):803-5. PubMed | Google Scholar

  26. Gábor Szabó, Bastian Schmack, Cem Bulut, Pál Soós, Alexander Weymann, Stadtfeld S et al. Constrictive pericarditis: risks, aetiologies and outcomes after total pericardiectomy: 24 years of experience. European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery. 2013;44(6):1023-8. PubMed | Google Scholar

  27. Eerola A, Pihkala JI, Karlberg N, Lipsanen-Nyman M, Jokinen E. Cardiac dysfunction in children with mulibrey nanism. Pediatric cardiology. 2007 May-Jun;28(3):155-62. PubMed | Google Scholar

  28. Nataf P CP, Dorent R, Jault F, Bors V, Pavie A et al. Results of subtotal pericardiectomy for constricyve pericarditis. European journal of cardio-thoracic surgery : official journal of the European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery. 1993;7:252-6. Google Scholar

  29. Anish Sheth A, Joseph Lim K. Liver disease from asymptomatic constrictive pericarditis. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2008; 42(8):956-958. PubMed | Google Scholar

  30. Vistarini N, Chen C, Mazine A, Bouchard D, Hebert Y, Carrier M et al. Pericardiectomy for Constrictive Pericarditis: 20 years of experience at the Montreal Heart Institute. The Annals of thoracic surgery. 2015 Jul; 100(1):107-13. PubMed | Google Scholar

  31. Bashi VV, John S, Ravikumar E, Jairaj PS, Shyamsunder K, Krishnaswami S. Early and late results of pericardiectomy in 118 cases of constrictive pericarditis. Thorax. 1988; 43(8):637-41. PubMed | Google Scholar

  32. Mukesh Kumawat, Tapan Kumar Lahiri, Damyanti Agarwal. Constrictive pericarditis: retrospective study of 109 patients. Asian Cardiovasc Thorac Ann. 2018 Jun;26(5):347-352. PubMed | Google Scholar

  33. Akdemir I, Davutoglu V, Aksoy M. Constrictive pericarditis localized to left pleural effusion. Echocardiography. 2002 May;19(4):329-32. PubMed | Google Scholar

  34. Ling LH, Oh JK, Tei C, Click RL, Breen JF, Seward JB, et al. Pericardial Thickness Measured With Transesophageal Echocardiography: Feasibility and Potential Clinical Usefulness. Journal of the American College of Cardiology. 1997; 29(6):1317-23. PubMed | Google Scholar

  35. Syed FF, Schaff HV, Oh JK. Constrictive pericarditis: a curable diastolic heart failure. Nat Rev Cardiol. 2014; 11(9):530-44. PubMed | Google Scholar

  36. Marta Madeira, Rogrio Teixeira, Marco Costa, Lino Gonalves, Allan Klein L. Two-dimensional speckle tracking cardiac mechanics and constrictive pericarditis: systematic review. Echocardiography. Echocardiography. 2016 Oct;33(10):1589-1599. PubMed | Google Scholar

  37. Oh JK, Hatle KL, Seward JB, Danielson GK, Schaff HV, Reeder GS et al. Diagnostic role of doppler echocardiography in constrictive pericarditis. Journal of the American College of Cardiology. 1994;23(1):154-62. PubMed | Google Scholar

  38. Ha JW, Ommen SR, Tajik AJ, Barnes ME, Ammash NM, Gertz MA et al. Differentiation of constrictive pericarditis from restrictive cardiomyopathy using mitral annular velocity by tissue Doppler echocardiography. The American journal of cardiology. 2004 Aug 1;94(3):316-9. PubMed | Google Scholar

  39. Xue Lin, Rui-Yi Xu, Jian-Zhou Liu, Wei Chen, Lian-Feng Chen, Peng-Hua Yang et al. Effect of right heart systolic function on outcomes in patients with constrictive pericarditis undergoing pericardiectomy. Chinese medical journal. 2016 Jan 20;129(2):154-61. PubMed | Google Scholar

  40. Muhammad Choudhry W, Mohamed Homsi, Ronald Mastouri, Harvey Feigenbaum, Stephen Sawada G. Prevalence and prognostic value of right ventricular systolic dysfunction in patients with constrictive pericarditis who underwent pericardiectomy. The American journal of cardiology. 2015 Aug 1; 116(3):469-73. PubMed | Google Scholar

  41. Nilgun Bozbuga, Vedat Erentug, Ercan Eren, Hasan Basri Erdogan, Kaan Kirali, Arzu Antal et al. Pericardiectomy for chronic constrictive tuberculous pericarditis: risks and predictors of survival. Tex Heart Inst J. 2003; 30(3):180-5. PubMed | Google Scholar

  42. Yu HT, Ha JW, Lee S, Shim CY, Moon J, Cho IJ et al. Transient right ventricular dysfunction after pericardiectomy in patients with constrictive pericarditis. Korean circulation journal. 2011 May; 41(5):283-6. PubMed | Google Scholar

  43. Azrak, Kern MJ. Hemodynamic rounds série II: evaluating new hemodynamic criteria of constrictive physiology: respiratory dynamics. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 1999; 47(1):80-4. PubMed | Google Scholar

  44. Markus Schwefer, Rene Aschenbach, Jan Heidemann, Celia Mey, Harald Lapp. Constrictive pericarditis, still a diagnostic challenge: comprehensive review of clinical management. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2009; 36(3):502-10. PubMed | Google Scholar

  45. McCaughan BC, Schaff HV, Piehler JM, Danielson GK, Orszulak TA, Puga FJ et al. Early and late results of pericardiectomy for constrictive pericarditis. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1985; 89(3):340-50. PubMed | Google Scholar

  46. Ujjwal Chowdhury K, Ganapathy Subramaniam K, Sampath Kumar A, Balram Airan, Rajvir Singh, Sachin Talwar et al. Pericardiectomy for constrictive pericarditis: a clinical, echocardiographic and haemodynamic evaluation of two surgical techniques. AnnThorac Surg. 2006; 81(2):522-29. PubMed | Google Scholar

  47. Ariyoshi T, Hashizume K, Taniguchi S, Miura T, Tanigawa K, Matsukuma S et al. Surgical experience with chronic constrictive pericarditis. General thoracic and cardiovascular surgery. 2012 Dec; 60(12):796-802. PubMed | Google Scholar

  48. Cinar B, Y En, Gksel O, Cimen S, Ketenci B, Teski O et al. Chronic constrictive tuberculous pericarditis-risk factors and outcome of pericardiectomy. INt J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2006; 10(6):701-6. PubMed | Google Scholar

  49. Yang Hyun Cho, Hartzell Schaff V, Joseph Dearani A, Richard Daly C, Soon Park J, Zhuo Liet al. Completion pericardiectomy for recurrent constrictive pericarditis: importance of timing of recurrence on late clinical outcome of operation. The Annals of thoracic surgery. 2012 Apr;93(4):1236-40. PubMed | Google Scholar

  50. Devendra Patil V, Girish Sabnis R, Milind Phadke S, Charan Lanjewar P, Prashant Mishra, Dwarkanath Kulkarni V et al. Echocardiographic parameters in clinical responders to surgical pericardiectomy: a single center experience with chronic constrictive pericarditis. Indian Heart Journal. May-Jun 2016;68(3):316-24 PubMed | Google Scholar

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Case series

Constrictive pericarditis: 21 years´ experience and review of literature

Case series

Constrictive pericarditis: 21 years´ experience and review of literature

Case series

Constrictive pericarditis: 21 years´ experience and review of literature