Home | Volume 17 | Article number 200

Original article

Water pipe smoking: an emerging trend with detrimental consequences

Water pipe smoking: an emerging trend with detrimental consequences

 

Henry Nyongesa1,&, Jacob Adegu1

 

1University of Nairobi, School of Medicine, Nairobi, Kenya

 

 

&Corresponding author
Henry Nyongesa, University of Nairobi, School of Medicine, Nairobi, Kenya

 

 

 

 

Commentary

Over the past decade, water pipe smoking has spread globally at an alarming rate. In the Middle East particularly, prevalence estimates of smoking hookah have already surpassed those of cigarette [1]. What captures the magnitude of the trend on a world wide scale is the Global Youth Tobacco survey commissioned in 1999 to provide up to date data on tobacco use among ages 13-15 in 95 countries [2].

Though diverse geographic settings hold different designs of water pipe, the defining feature in the set up is the passage of smoke through water. This has been erroneously referred to as filtering. When flavored tobacco is burnt in charcoal or coal, the smoke passes through the body to the bowl containing water; and then to the smoker through a pipe. What tends to encourage smokers is the false perception emanating from the "filtering" process that is assumed to detoxify smoke contents.

But what factors may be contributing to this wide spread use of water pipe? This question has elicited massive interest as evidenced by an array of surveys performed principally in the Middle East [3-5].

Generally, these factors fall into various domains of human life. From a social perspective, it has been noted through a comparative study that while cigarette smoking is frowned upon, there is more acceptance especially for women to smoke the water pipe [6]. Additionally, this habit is perceived as a means of communal association. It is not uncommon for visitors to be offered a water pipe as an ice breaker. This is replicated even in hospitality settings where clients enquire first on the availability of a water pipe before other services can be rendered [7].

Importantly, the competitive edge of water pipe over cigarette in addition to perceived safety is introduction of factory sweetened flavours. A great majority of water pipes are filled with a variety of flavours for which the partakers obtain a sense of relaxation from demanding lifestyles [8]. It also makes economic sense as water pipe smoking is usually a communal event with expenses customarily shared among smokers [9].

Despite popularity of water pipe, most smokers are ignorant of deleterious health consequences associated with the habit. A matched analysis of toxic components of water pipe and cigarette dwarfed the perceived safety of the former. At the outset is the dramatic exposure to more smoke and carbon monoxide levels of up to four times that found in cigarettes [10]. The polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, napthylamines, nitrosamines, and primary aromatic amines have also been isolated in greater quantities [11].

While it has been firmly established that cigarette smoking is a major risk factor for numerous cancers, there has not been long term substantial studies to assess the role of water pipe in cancer causation. However, emerging data from available studies point to a clearly worrying state that warrants urgent attention of public health activists [12-15].

In light of a severe toxicity profile, it can be argued that there will be an unprecedented increase in lung cancer cases. Interestingly, a systematic review by Elie Aki and colleagues could not establish if some of the malignancies associated with cigarette smoking were also associated with water pipe. These included oral dysplasia and cancers of urinary bladder, esophagus and nasopharynx [16]. Nevertheless converging evidence from gene oncology studies remarkably reveals the central role of water pipe smoking in increasing mitotic index, micronuclei, chromosomal aberrations as well as satellite associations [17,18]. Indeed, these findings indicate that smoking of water pipe just like cigarette, is a major risk for cancer.

Arguably, cigarette and the latest entrant; water pipe smoking are twin disasters that will continue plaguing public health policymakers from the continent. These habits are at the inner core of exacerbating the burden of non communicable disease in less endowed countries of Africa and Asia, which already are reeling from effects of infectious diseases. Drawing from benefit of hindsight that African youth culture is easily shaped by trends in the East and West, it is highly likely that water pipe smoking will be commonplace.

Granted, almost all governments have laws prohibiting public use of tobacco products; it is the lackluster manner of implementation that has slowed war against this publicly repugnant behavior. Even more disturbing is failure to recognize that water pipe is another means of smoking tobacco. It should be appreciated that although the laws are flagrantly flouted, even passive smoking poses grave consequences to the public. Notwithstanding the limitations, we believe that there are abundant opportunities for the continent to engage in concerted efforts to curb this scourge before it spirals out of control.

The simplicity in dealing with this public health hazard can be initiated through a multipronged approach. Consistent public health education on dangers of smoking is a stepping stone to halting the trend as attested in a variety of landmark studies [19]. As paucity of knowledge is one of the contributing factors, education tailored and delivered in an emphatic way goes a great way in reducing the prevalence of tobacco smoking in whatever form. Health care providers should be at forefront in liberating the public from mythological "feel good effects" posed by smoking.

Secondly, it is incumbent upon governments to decisively deal with the menace through implementation of policies to the latter. They should resist underhand deals, so well perfected by large tobacco manufacturers, to prevent the disastrous descent into health anarchism. For the expenses involved in management of patients with cancer and other non-communicable diseases attributable to smoking are agonizing for any government or individual to bear on long term scale. Therefore, the buck does not even stop at formulating tangible preventive measures but rather in rapidly and sustainably implementing them.

In conclusion, water pipe smoking has lately been embraced especially in developing countries oblivious of its more grave effects compared to cigarette. Primarily, the fast growing popularity is hinged on varied factors. We posit that if the habit is not addressed early through effective policy formulation and implementation, then public health systems under African ambit should brace themselves for dire consequences in future.

 

 

Competing interests

Authors declared no competing interests.

 

 

Authors’ contributions

Nyongesa came up with the idea. Both authors discussed, wrote and approved the final draft.

 

 

References

  1. El-Awa F, Warren CW, Jones NR. Changes in tobacco use among 13-15 year olds between 1999 and 2007: findings from the Eastern Mediterranean Region. East Mediterr Health J. 2010;16(3):266-73. PubMed | Google Scholar

  2. Warren CW, Lea V, Lee J, Jones NR, Asma S, McKenna M. Change in tobacco use among 13-15 year olds between 1999 and 2008: findings from the Global Youth Tobacco Survey. Glob Health Promot. 2009;16(Suppl 2):38-90. PubMed | Google Scholar

  3. Chaaya M, El Roueiheb Z, Chemaitelly H, Azar G, Nasr J, Al-Sahab B. Argileh smoking among university students: a tobacco epidemic. Nicotine Tobacco Res. 2004;6(3): 457-6. PubMed | Google Scholar

  4. Al-Turki YA, Al-Turki YA. Smoking habits among medical students in Central Saudi Arabia. Saudi Med J. 2006;27(5): 700-3. PubMed | Google Scholar

  5. Haddad N, Hamadeh RR. Smoking among secondary-school boys in Bahrain: prevalence and risk factors. East Mediterr Health J. 2003; 9(1-9): 78-86. PubMed | Google Scholar

  6. Maziak W, Fouad MF, Hammal F, Asfar T, Bachir EM, Rastam S. Prevalence and characteristics of narghile smoking among university students in Syria. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis (in press). 2004 Jul;8(7):882-9. PubMed | Google Scholar

  7. Roskin J, Aveyard P. Canadian and English students' beliefs about waterpipe smoking: a qualitative study. BMC Public Health. 2009; 9(1):10. PubMed | Google Scholar

  8. Maziak W, Eissenberg T, Rastam S, Hammal F, Asfar T, Bachir ME, Fouad MF, Ward KD. Beliefs and Attitudes Related to Narghile (Waterpipe) Smoking Among University Students in Syria. Ann Epidemiol. 2004; 14(9):646-654. PubMed | Google Scholar

  9. Rastam S, Ward K, Eissenberg T, Maziak W. Estimating the beginning of the waterpipe epidemic in Syria. BMC Public Health.2004; 4: 32. PubMed | Google Scholar

  10. Essenberg T,Shihadeh A. Waterpipe Tobacco and Cigarette Smoking; Direct Comparison of Toxicant Exposure. Am J Prev Med. 2009;37(6):518-523. PubMed | Google Scholar

  11. Schubert J, Hahn J, Dettbarn G, Seidel A, Luch A, Schulz TG. Mainstream smoke of the waterpipe: does this environmental matrix reveal as significant source of toxic compounds?.Toxicol Lett. 2011;205(3):279-84. PubMed | Google Scholar

  12. Jabbour S, El-Roueiheb Z, Sibai AM. Nargileh (Waterpipe) smoking and incident coronary heart disease: a case-control study. Ann Epidemiol. 2003;13:570. PubMed | Google Scholar

  13. Nuwayhid IA, Yamout B, Azar G et al .Narghile (hubble-bubble) smoking, low birth weight, and other pregnancy outcomes. Am J Epidemiol. 1998;148(4): 375-83. PubMed | Google Scholar

  14. Natto S, Baljoon M, Abanmy A et al. Tobacco smoking and gingival health in a Saudi Arabian population. Oral Health Prev. 2004;2(4): 351-7. PubMed | Google Scholar

  15. WHO Study Group on Tobacco Product Regulation (TobReg). Advisory Note. Waterpipe Tobacco Smoking: Health Effects, Research Needs and Recommended Actions by Regulators. WHO: Geneva, 2005. PubMed | Google Scholar

  16. Elie AA,Swarna Gaddam,Sameer K Gunukula,Roland Honeine,Philippe Abou Jaoude Jihad Irani . The effects of waterpipe tobacco smoking on health outcomes: a systematic review. International Journal of Epidemiology. 2010;39:834-857. PubMed | Google Scholar

  17. Yadav JS, Thakur S. Genetic risk assessment in hookah smokers. Cytobios. 2000; 101(397):101-13. PubMed | Google Scholar

  18. Alsatari ES, Azab M, Khabour OF, Alzoubi KH, Sadiq MF. Assessment of NA damage using chromosomal aberrations assay in lymphocytes of waterpipe smokers. Int J Occup Med Environ Health. 2012;25(3):218-24. PubMed | Google Scholar

  19. Nakkash R, Khalil J. Health warning labeling practices on narghile (shisha, hookah) waterpipe tobacco products and related accessories. Tob Control. 2010;19:235-239. PubMed | Google Scholar