Videocapsule retention: role of surgical treatment (a case report)
Rachid Boufettal, Yassine Fahmi, Saad Rifki Jai, Farid Chehab
The Pan African Medical Journal. 2015;22:64. doi:10.11604/pamj.2015.22.64.4300

Create an account  |  Sign in
Case studies in Public health Supplement 2 Supplement
"Better health through knowledge sharing and information dissemination "

Case report

Videocapsule retention: role of surgical treatment (a case report)

Cite this: The Pan African Medical Journal. 2015;22:64. doi:10.11604/pamj.2015.22.64.4300

Received: 03/04/2014 - Accepted: 01/03/2015 - Published: 23/09/2015

Key words: Video capsule, retention, small bowel stenosis, surgical extraction, stricturoplasty

© Rachid Boufettal et al. The Pan African Medical Journal - ISSN 1937-8688. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Available online at: http://www.panafrican-med-journal.com/content/article/22/64/full

Corresponding author: Rachid Boufettal, General Surgery Department III, UHC Ibn Rochd, Casablanca, Morocco (racbouf@hotmail.fr)


Videocapsule retention: role of surgical treatment (a case report)

 

Rachid Boufettal1,&, Yassine Fahmi1, Saad Rifki Jai1, Farid Chehab1

 

1General Surgery Department III, UHC Ibn Rochd, Casablanca, Morocco

 

 

&Corresponding author
Rachid Boufettal, General Surgery Department III, UHC Ibn Rochd, Casablanca, Morocco

 

 

Abstract

Video capsule endoscopy (VCE) is a safe innovative tool for investigating obscure gastrointestinal diseases. The capsule is usually excreted with faeces within 24-48 h. Retention of capsule rarely occurs, and it usually depends on the indication of VCE. Retention may long remain asymptomatic or manifest as subocclusif syndrome. Acute complications of retention are very rare but can be life-threatening illness. Surgical approach is considered effective to retrieve the retained capsule, treat the pathology responsible and prevent acute complications.We report the case of a 30 years old patient, followed for Crohn’s disease. She received during the assessment reviewed by VCE that has been held for three months. The retention caused subocclusif symptoms of which had needed surgically procedure. Treatment consisted of remove the VCE and repair of stenosis of small bowel by stricturoplasty.

 

 

Introduction

Videocapsule endoscopy (VCE) has become a routineinvestigative toolin the diagnosis ofsmall bowel diseases.Retention of theVCEis a seriouscomplicationof this examination. The retention leads to the occurrence of acute intestinalobstruction or intestinal perforationrequiring emergency surgery [1,2]. We report the case of VCE retention on small bowel stenosis due to CROHN disease.

 

 

Patient and observation

A 30-year-old woman without medical history had undergoing an exploration by VCE three months ago for digestive symptoms as diffuse abdominal pain, chronic constipation, Iron-deficiency anemia and alteration of general state. The patienthas not eliminatedthecapsuleafter48 hours.Plain abdominal radiography showed persistence of VCE (Figure 1). Thereafter, the patient began toexhibitrepeated subocclusifsyndrome. She underwent surgical exploration that showed wall thickening and incomplete strictures at multiple levels of small bowel compatible with ileal Crohn´s disease. The VCE was enclosed in stricture located 2 meters from duodenojejunal junction. A longitudinalenterotomy on the stricture with VCE extraction was performed (Figure 2, Figure 3). The enterotomy was repaired by stricturoplasty. The postoperative course was uneventful.

 

 

Discussion

Capsule retention is defined by the International Conference on Capsule Endoscopy (ICCE) 2005 as having a capsule endoscope remain in the digestive tract for minimum two weeks. Capsule retention is further defined as the capsule remaining in the bowel lumen unless it is recovered medically, endoscopically or surgically [3].

 

Retention rate of VCE depends mainly on its indications. It goes from 0% in subjects without any gastrointestinal disease to 21% in cases of intestinal obstruction [4]. This rate is 5% in patients suspected Crohn’s disease. Liao et al [5], reported 184 cases of retention (1,4%) among 22840 explorations with VCE of which 2,6% occurred on Crohn’s disease, 1,2% on obscure gastrointestinal bleeding and 2,1% on gastrointestinal neoplasm. Furthermore, AINS induced enteropathy, post-operativestenosis, ischemia and radiation enteritis can occur retention [5,6]. Meckel’s diverticulum, peptic ulcer, cryptogenic multifocal stenosing enteritis can rarelybeinvolved with frequencies of less than 2% of total capsule retention. In our patient,theretentionoccurred probably on crohn’s disease [4].

 

Retention of capsule is mostly asymptomatic. Furthermore, it causes subocclusif symptoms [2,5]. Retention can contribute to etiological diagnosis and the level of obstruction [2]. Some acute complications due to retention of VCE were reported in literature. In a study of 2300 explorations by VCE, six cases have acute intestinal obstruction [1]. One case of intestinal perforation 2 months after par VCE examination for exploration of anemia was reported [7].

 

The management of capsule retention can undergo expectant, medical and endoscopic procedure or even surgical intervention. Medicaltreatment is based on anti-inflammatories, colonic preparation or rectal enema [1,8]. Surgery allows not only the extraction of the capsule but can also contribute to treatment of the etiology of retention and prevents its complications [5,7]. The longest duration of retention is reported by Bhattarai et al [9], the capsule was retained on ileorectal anastomosis without complication during 4,5 years and it was successfully removed by endoscopic procedure. Hauser et al [10] reported two cases of VCE retention. In the first case, VCE was located in proximal jejunum and successfully removed by enteroscopy, in the second case; VCE was located in rectum and removed by surgery after failure colonoscopy. Liao et al [5] reported spontaneous elimination or by medical treatment in 15%, by endoscopic procedure in 12% andby surgery in 58,7% of the cases with retention capsule. One death attributed to surgery complication was reported [1]. Our patient underwent surgery extraction with treatment of stenosis by stricturoplasty. The postoperative course was uneventful.

 

 

Conclusion

VCE retention is a serious complication this examination. Although rare, we must keep inmind the possibilityof an acute complication of retention of the VCE. Surgical treatment must be considered in case offailure ofendoscopicextractionandifa cause of retention requires surgery.Surgical treatmentallows the extraction ofthecapsule, the treatment of the cause and preventsacutecomplications of retention.

 

 

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interest.

 

 

Authors’ contributions

All authors read and agreed to the final version of this manuscript and equally contributed to its content and to the management of the case.

 

 

Figures

Figure 1: plain abdominal radiography showing retained videocapsule (arrow)

Figure 2: photo during surgery showing video capsule extraction by enterotomy

Figure 3: video capsule after extraction

 

 

References

  1. Höög CM, Bark LÅ, Arkani J, Gorsetman J, Broström O, Sjöqvist U. Capsule retentions and incomplete capsule endoscopy examinations: an analysis of 2300 examinations. Gastroenterol Res Pract. 2012; 2012:518718. PubMed | Google Scholar

  2. Cheifetz AS, Lewis BS. Capsule endoscopy retention: is it a complication? J Clin Gastroenterol. 2006;40(8):688-91. PubMed | Google Scholar

  3. Cave D, Legnani P, de Franchis R, Lewis BS. ICCE consensus for capsule retention. Endoscopy. 2005;37(10):1065-7. PubMed | Google Scholar

  4. Mata A, Llach J, Bordas JM. Wireless capsule endoscopy. World J Gastroenterol. 2008;14(13):1969-71. PubMed | Google Scholar

  5. Liao Z, Gao R, Xu C, Li ZS. Indications and detection, completion, and retention rates of small-bowel capsule endoscopy: a systematic review. Gastrointest Endosc. 2010;71(2):280-6. PubMed | Google Scholar

  6. Rogers AM, Kuperman E, Puleo FJ, Shope TR. Intestinal obstruction by capsule endoscopy in a patient with radiation enteritis. JSLS. 2008;12(1):85-7. PubMed | Google Scholar

  7. Gonzalez Carro P, Picazo Yuste J, Fernández Díez S, Pérez Roldán F, Roncero García-Escribano O. Intestinal perforation due to retained wireless capsule endoscope. Endoscopy. 2005;37(7):684. PubMed | Google Scholar

  8. Levsky JM, Milikow DL, Rozenblit AM, Wolf EL. Small bowel obstruction due to an impacted endoscopy capsule.Abdom Imaging. 2008;33(5):579-81. PubMed | Google Scholar

  9. Bhattarai M, Bansal P, Khan Y. Longest duration of retention of video capsule: a case report and literature review. World J Gastrointest Endosc. 2013;5(7):352-5. PubMed | Google Scholar

  10. Hauser G, Stimac D, Giljaca V, Mijandrusic Sincic B. Video capsule retention-endoscopic or surgical problem? Clin Res Hepatol Gastroenterol. 2012;36(6):e135-6. PubMed | Google Scholar

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


The Pan African Medical Journal articles are archived on Pubmed Central. Access PAMJ archives on PMC here

Volume 28 (September - December 2017)

Article tools

Rate this article

Altmetric

PAMJ is a member of the Committee on Publication Ethics
Next abstract

PAMJ is published in collaboration with the African Field Epidemiology Network (AFENET)
Currently tracked by: DOAJ, AIM, Google Scholar, AJOL, EBSCO, Scopus, Embase, IC, HINARI, Global Health, PubMed Central, PubMed/Medline, Ulrichsweb, More to come . Member of COPE.

ISSN: 1937-8688. © 2017 - Pan African Medical Journal. All rights reserved