High IgE sensitization to maize and rice pollen in the highlands of Madagascar
Ramavovololona Perle, Hélène Sénéchal, Ange Andrianarisoa, Vololona Rakotoarimanana, Dominique Godfrin, Gabriel Peltre, Pascal Poncet, Jean-Pierre Sutra
The Pan African Medical Journal. 2014;19:284. doi:10.11604/pamj.2014.19.284.4654

Create an account  |  Sign in
Case studies in Public health Supplement 2 Supplement
"Better health through knowledge sharing and information dissemination "

Research

High IgE sensitization to maize and rice pollen in the highlands of Madagascar

Cite this: The Pan African Medical Journal. 2014;19:284. doi:10.11604/pamj.2014.19.284.4654

Received: 22/05/2014 - Accepted: 06/11/2014 - Published: 15/11/2014

Key words: IgE binding proteins, Madagascar, maize, rice, pollen allergy, urban and peri-urban agriculture

© Ramavovololona Perle et al. The Pan African Medical Journal - ISSN 1937-8688. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Available online at: http://www.panafrican-med-journal.com/content/article/19/284/full

Corresponding author: Pascal Poncet, Allergy & Environment Team, Department of Biochemistry, Armand Trousseau Children Hospital, 26 avenue du Dr Arnold Netter, 75571 Paris cedex 12, France (pascal.poncet@pasteur.fr)


High IgE sensitization to maize and rice pollen in the highlands of Madagascar

 

Perle Ramavovololona 1, Hélène Sénéchal2,3, Ange Andrianarisoa4, Vololona Rakotoarimanana1, Dominique Godfrin5, Gabriel Peltre2,6, Pascal Poncet2,7,&, Jean-Pierre Sutra2

 

1University of Science, Biology and Plant Ecology Department, BP 906, Antananarivo 101, Madagascar, 2 Armand Trousseau Children Hospital Hospital, Biochemistry Department, Allergy & Environment, 26 avenue du Dr Arnold Netter, 75571 Paris cedex 12, France, 3Inserm, 101 rue de Tolbiac, 75013 Paris, France, 4Medical University, Medicine and Medical Specialties Department, BP 375, Antananarivo 101, Madagascar, 5Laboratory of Scientific Police, 31 Avenue Franklin Roosevelt, 69130, Ecully, France, 6CNRS, 75794, Paris cedex 16, France, 7Pasteur Institute, Infections & Epidemiology Department, 25-28 rue du Dr Roux, 75724, Paris cedex 15, France

 

 

&Corresponding author
Pascal Poncet, Allergy & Environment Team, Department of Biochemistry, Armand-Trousseau Children Hospital, 26 avenue du Dr Arnold Netter, 75571 Paris cedex 12, France

 

 

Abstract

Introduction: maize and rice are two crops constituting the main food supply in many under-developed and developing countries. Despite the large area devoted to the culture, the sensitization to the pollen from these plants is reported to be low and often considered as an occupational allergy.

 

Methods: sixty five Malagasy pollen allergic patients were clinically and immunochemically investigated with regard to maize and rice pollen allergens. Pollen extracts were electrophoretically separated in 1 and 2 dimensions and IgE and IgG reactivities detected upon immunoblotting.

 

Results: when exploring the sensitization profile of Malagasy allergic patients to maize and rice pollen, it appears that a high proportion of these patients consulting during grass pollinating season were sensitized to both pollen as revealed by skin prick testing (62 vs. 59%) and IgE immunoblotting (85 vs. 40%). Several clinically relevant allergens were recognized by patients' serum IgE in maize and rice pollen extracts.

 

Conclusion: the high levels of maize and rice pollen sensitization should be related, in this tropical region, to a specific environmental exposure including i) a proximity of the population to the allergenic sources and ii) a putative exacerbating effect of a highly polluted urban atmosphere on pollen allergenicity. Cross reactivities between wild and cultivated grasses and also between rice and maize pollen are involved as well as some specific maize sensitizations. The presence of dense urban and peri-urban agriculture, in various African regions and worldwide, could be a high environmental risk factor for people sensitive to maize pollen.

 

 

Introduction

The highlands constitute, in Madagascar, the main populated area with the presence of the capital town - Antananarivo (around 1.85M inhabitants) - and of Antsirabe (currently around 200, 000 inhabitants). Beside traditional rural agricultural systems, the food supply for such large cities includes, now for decades, peri-urban and urban agricultural zones, as already described in other towns from developing countries [1-3]. Rice (Oryzeae) is the main crop in the highlands as well as in other regions of Madagascar. It arrived on this land with the Austronesians who settled as primal inhabitants in the first millennium of the Christian era [4], whereas maize, of American origin, was introduced quite later through Europe-Africa trade exchanges. The presence of maize culture was attested in the island in the first part of the 17th century [5]. Regarding rice cultivation, the irrigated one is the most important, covering more than 80% of all areas under this cereal. The maize (Panicoideae, Maydeae tribe), used for local food supply is the second cereal crop in Madagascar. Among the different varieties, two of them - Meva and Volasoa - are cultivated by around 40% of the farmers (www.inter-reseaux.org). The maize is mostly cultivated at proximity of the population and the rice is grown in irrigated paddy fields, most often away from inhabitants in the highlands of Madagascar.

 

Despite its increasing worldwide trends, allergy remains poorly studied in Madagascar [6,7]. In the same West Indian Ocean and South African zones, some studies have reported that the urban population is now often affected and regularly treated [8-10]. Among respiratory allergic diseases, allergy to grass pollen represents an important part because grasses are widely distributed. Aerobiological studies in Antananarivo showed that grass pollen is determinant in the urban atmosphere [11]. Sensitization to rice and maize pollen has been clinically investigated [12,13]. They are often considered as an occupational allergy in farmers and field workers [14-16] or the result of the documented cross-reactivities with wild grasses [17-19]. Reported allergens for pollen of these 2 crops are listed in Table 1. Ten allergens have been described in maize and 7 of them, belonging to the same protein families, were also found in rice pollen. The major allergens β-expansins (groups 1-3 of grass pollen allergens) [20-22], profilin (group 12) [23] and polygalacturonase (group 13) [24] were characterized both in maize and rice pollen.

 

In order to explore the extent of respiratory diseases related to allergy to grass pollen in Madagascar, an epidemiological study was carried out on patients consulting for respiratory disorders in two different centers of Antananarivo [11]. On the basis of a standardized questionnaire, clinical symptoms, skin prick test and correlations of symptoms with pollen airborne content and/or documented pollinating season, 65 allergic patients were selected to quantitatively and qualitatively evaluate some clinical and immunochemical parameters associated to grass pollinosis. In a previous report, we published the results related to 6 selected wild grass pollen and showed that, besides cross-reactivities, sensitization is mainly directed against the local tropical dominant wild grass, Rhynchelytrum repens [7]. To give a complete picture of the prevalence of allergy to grass pollen in Madagascar our results are now extended to cultivated grasses, maize and rice, that show overlapping pollinating periods with wild grasses. The level of sensitization to the pollen of these two main crops was clinically and immunochemically evaluated and was found to be high. The proximity of cultivation areas, close to inhabitants, and/or a highly polluted atmosphere, could be the crucial environmental risk factors in the development of such allergic symptoms in this region.

 

 

Methods

This study was conducted in accordance with the principles of the declaration of Helsinki, with institutional approval (from both University of Antananarivo, Madagascar and Hôpital Civil, Strasbourg, France). Written informed consent has been obtained from all patients.

 

Patient recruitment and patient sera

 

A previous comprehensive epidemiological study was carried out in the Lung and Allergy Department of the "Institut d'Hygiène Social" and the "Infirmerie de la Gendarmerie du Toby Ratsimandrava" in Antananarivo (Madagascar) on about 1500 individuals suffering from respiratory disorders (consultations and data files analysis). The follow up during 2 years included the record of clinical symptoms such as respiratory infections, asthma, rhinitis, conjunctivitis, rhino-conjunctivitis, dyspnea but also dermatological disorders such as dermatitis, eczema and urticaria [11]. From this initial cohort, a sub cohort of 65 patients was selected on the basis of (i) the correlation of clinical symptoms with the grass pollination season, (ii) skin prick test (reported in [7] and in this paper) and (iii) a standardized questionnaire prepared by physicians with extensive experience in allergic diseases. All grass pollen allergic patients (PAP), 28 males and 37 females, mean age 33 year-old (range: 3 to 65), participated voluntarily in the study. The main symptoms for these patients were rhinitis, conjunctivitis and/or asthma during the flowering season. Some PAP showed food allergy symptoms such as diarrhea, nausea, vomiting associated to rashes. The sera used in this survey are the same than for our previous study [7]. Two additional sera from grass and birch sensitized Caucasian/European patients born in Strasbourg area, (France) were also used [7, 25]. These patients had never been in Madagascar. A serum from a non-allergic non-atopic individual was used as control.

 

Maize and rice pollen material

 

The pollen was collected directly from the flowers of the 2 crops between March and April. The Zea mays pollen used for most of the experiments of our study was from a Meva cultivar. This variety grows all around the city of Antananarivo and is one of the most cultivated in the island. It is a polyhybride registered as N° 374. This synthetic construction combining 5 South African and a local yellow lines variety has been selected for its resistance to leaves disease and for its adaptation to acidic soils. Its culture is agronomically adapted to an altitude ranging from 800 to 1500 m and to the climate of highlands. Five other varieties of maize pollen were used for 1D-isoelectrofocalisation (IEF) and immunoblot experiments. Four are from Madagascar: "Paysanne", a local farmer variety, "Volasoa" -also called "Los banös 8227"- as well as 2 varieties, created by private companies, "NTS" and "Tombotsoa". The last one is from Europe (Allergon AB, Sweden, W 2552). The rice pollen was a blend from several varieties among the three main seasonal types cultivated in the highlands locally called - from the 1st to 3rd seasonal one - respectively: vary aloha, vary vakiambaty and vary siha, including indica and japonica subspecies.

 

Pollen extracts for skin prick tests (SPTs) and SPTs

 

Pollen extracts were prepared in the same way than in Ramavovololona et al [7]. Briefly: 1 mL of 0.9% NaCl, 0.3% NaH(CO3)2 was added to 100 mg of each pollen and obtained as previously described [25,26]. SPTs were performed using these pollen extracts and tested on the 65 PAP for the 2 taxa. For the 2 Caucasian/European patients, the grass pollen extract was provided by Stallergènes Laboratories, (Antony, France). A negative control test with saline solution and a positive control test with histamine (1 mg/mL) were included in each set of SPT. SPT response was positively scored if the largest wheal diameter was greater than that was produced by the negative control and at least 70% greater than that was produced by the positive control.

 

Pollen extracts for IEF and immunodetections

 

Water soluble extracts were obtained by incubating 30 mg of fresh pollen for 1h at 22°C in 150μL sterile water followed by a centrifugation at 4°C for 15 min at 10,000 g. The supernatants were kept at -20°C.

 

1D-IEF separation and 1D-immunodetection

 

IEF was performed in a 0.8 % agarose gel (Isogel, FMC Rockland, Maine, USA) [27] containing 12 % (w/v) sorbitol and 2% (v/v) of a mixture of carrier ampholytes (Servalyt® pH 3-10, Serva, Heidelberg, Germany) on a flat bed electrophoretic chamber (Multiphor II, Amersham Biosciences, Uppsala, Sweden) cooled at 15°C according to the manufacturer's instructions. Standard proteins with a range of isoelectric point (pI) from 4.7 to 10.6 (BDH Electron, VWR International, England) were used as pI markers. After IEF, a part of the gel was stained with Coomassie blue. The other part of the gel was blotted on either nitrocellulose (NC) (Optitran BA-S 83, Schleicher & Schuell, Dassel, Germany) [7] or polyvinylidene fluoride membrane (PVDF, Immobilon TM, Millipore, Bedford, MA, USA) sheets. The membranes were then dried and cut into strips (3 mm width) that were incubated overnight at 22 °C with individual sera diluted at 1:10 [7]. Thereafter, the strips were incubated either with alkaline phosphatase (AP)-conjugated goat anti-human IgG (Sigma-Aldrich) diluted at 1:3000 or peroxidase (PO)-conjugated goat anti-human IgE (Sigma-Aldrich) diluted at 1:1000 in tris buffer saline with 1% defatted milk and 0.2% Tween 20 (TBS-M-Tw). After 3 washes with TBS-Tw and 3 washes with TBS, the IgG and IgE bindings were detected by chemiluminescence (Amersham ECL kits, GE Healthcare, Uppsala). For PVDF membranes used in IEF immunoblotting of the different maize varieties pollen extracts, the first steps were identical to what was described above. But after incubation with serum and washing steps, membranes were incubated with AP-conjugated goat anti-human IgE (Sigma-Aldrich) diluted at 1:700 in TBS-M-Tw (2h at 22°C). The AP activity was detected using 5-bromo-4-chloro-3-indolyl phosphate and nitroblue tetrazolium (Sigma) in 0.1 M tris buffer pH 9.5.

 

Two-dimensional gel electrophoresis (2D) and 2D-immunodetection

 

For 2D separation, Zea may pollen extract was submitted to an IEF separation performed in a polyacrylamide gel 5% C (GE Healthcare) containing 5% v/v Ampholine pH 3.5-9.5 as described above. After the IEF separation, 4 mm-wide strips of the focused gel were cut, incubated in the equilibration buffer (120mM Tris pH 6.8, 12 % SDS) and submitted to SDS-PAGE separation on an 8-18% gradient gel (GE Healthcare). Standard proteins with a range of relative molecular mass (Mr) from 14.4 to 94 kDa (GE Healthcare) was used as Mr markers. One of the 2D gels was silver-stained according to Blum et al. [28] in order to visualize all proteins and the other ones were electroblotted onto a bromide cyanogen-activated nitrocellulose membrane (NCa) [29] using a semi-dry Novablot apparatus (Amersham Biosciences) according to the manufacturer's instructions for 1h at 1 mA/cm2. The NCas were then dried, saturated with phosphate buffer saline - 0.3% Tween 20 and treated as described above. Then, membranes were incubated with AP-antibodies against either human IgG or IgE.

 

Statistical analysis

 

The statistical significance of differences in data was evaluated using Fisher's exact test.

 

 

Results

Clinical data of studied PAP are shown in Table 2, Table 3. Patients were mainly suffering from rhinoconjuntivitis (72%), 53% from asthma and 15% urticaria. Thirty one patients out of 65 (47.7 %) exhibited food allergy symptoms. Percentages of patients tested SPT-positive for maize or rice pollen extracts were both around 60% (Table 4) as compared to 71% for wild grasses. By SPT (Figure 1, A), 44% of patients were found co-sensitized to maize and rice pollen extract and among them, the majority (59%) had a weak positivity. The correlation between SPT to maize and rice pollen was statistically significant (p=0.015).

 

The specificity of seric IgE (Figure 2) were evaluated by immunoblot after separation of protein extract with IEF which has the advantage over other electrophoretic separation techniques to provide separations of proteins in their native conformation. Immunoblotting experiments showed that maize pollen proteins elicited IgE antibodies (Ab) (Figure 2, A) in 84.6% of patients and IgG Ab (Figure 2, D) in all of them. In contrast, IgE (Figure 2, B,C) and IgG (Figure 2, E) responses against rice pollen proteins were found only in 39.7% and 75.4% of patients, respectively (Table 4). Interestingly, in about 12% of the patient sera the Ab response to rice pollen protein seemed restricted to IgE isotype since no specific IgG isotype could be detected (data not shown). Moreover, 19 patient sera (33%) showed IgE reactivity against proteins from both pollen extracts (Figure 1, B), but the majority (51%) of patient sera only to maize pollen extract. In contrast to what was found by SPT, the comparison of IgE reactivity against maize and rice pollen evaluated by IgE immunoblot did not reveal any correlation (p=0.161). Furthermore, the comparison of SPT and immunoblot to evaluate the IgE reactivity showed no correlation for maize pollen extract (p=0.794) and a very significant correlation for rice pollen extract probably because of a higher number of double negative sera (36%) (p=0.00001) than for maize pollen (Figure 1,C,D).

 

The 1-D immunoblot results of each of the 2 crops pollen extracts (Figure 2) highlighted specific IgE-binding protein patterns. While no IgE reactivity was observed with a control serum (Figure 2,A) from a non-allergic individual, but having IgG reactivity (Figure 2, D), patients' allergic sera showed IgE reactivities against several maize proteins in a wide pI range. Two IgE-binding protein acidic zones, pI 4.6-5.5, the most frequently recognized and 5.5-6.0 can be visualized. These two zones might correspond to the allergens Zea m 1 and 2 (β-expansins) and the maize profilin (Zea m 12) (pI 4.4-5.0) as described in Table 1. A 3rd neutral zone (pI 6.6-7.1) showed also a strong IgE signal for several patient sera (Figure 2, A) and might correspond to isoforms of Zea m 13, the maize pollen polygalacturonase. IgG reactivities were also observed against several maize proteins in a wide pI range (Figure 2, D). By comparison, IEF immunoblots of the rice pollen extract exhibited less heterogeneity of IgE binding (Figure 2, B), but IgG reactivity against this extract was very heterogeneous (Figure 2, E). For the IgE reactivity, the pI range was more restricted and most of the sera gave positive signals in the neutral-basic zone, from pI 7 to 9.5 (Figure 2, B,C), consistent with already described allergens Ory s 1, 2, 3, 7 and 23 (Table 1). A few patient sera showed IgE binding to proteins with pI between 5.5 and 6.5 as well as in pI range from 6.0 to 6.8 (serum #24), that could correspond to isoforms of Ory s 1. IgE reactivities against basic allergens (pI > 9.0), were found only in the maize pollen extract and could correspond to Zea m 3. Sera #66 and #67, from European patients, (called A and B in our previous work [7]) showed a strong IgE binding to basic allergens in maize extract (Figure 2,A) whereas no IgE reactivity was found in rice extract (Figure 2, B).

 

Because of the heterogeneous IgE recognition patterns observed in 1D IEF immunoblot results for Meva cultivar maize pollen allergens, IgE binding profiles against 4 other local varieties of maize and an European one (Figure 3) were compared. Patient's serum #60 was used because of its highly heterogeneous IgE binding pattern against the Meva variety pollen extract (Figure 2, A). Both total protein (Figure 3, A) and IgE binding (Figure 3, A) patterns of the 6 varieties were close except in the very basic zone where only Meva and European varieties showed a strong IgE reactivity. Consequently, with regard to allergenicity, the Meva variety (lanes 4) is the closest to the European cultivar (lanes 5). To characterize the protein and antigenic repertoire of Meva variety maize pollen extract, 2D separation was performed. The gels were either silver stained for total protein visualization (Figure 4, A) or electroblotted onto NCas for subsequent characterization of IgG (Figure 4, A) or IgE (Figure 4, C) binding proteins with patient's serum #60 (already studied in 1D immunoblot experiments, see Figure 2, A strip indicated by a dot). About 200 protein spots were detected upon silver staining, with a broad distribution in pI (from 4.0 to 11) and in Mr (from 14 to 100 kDa) giving patterns in spot series suggestive of numerous isoforms (Figure 4, A). Antigens recognized by IgG of patient #60 (Figure 4, B) are much more diversified than the sole allergens (IgE binding proteins, Figure 4, C). They are mainly located in Mr > 30 kDa and covered the whole pI range from 4 to 11. About 15 well-defined IgG reactive proteins were found between 20 and 28 kDa.

 

Seven IgE-binding protein zones, likely to be isoforms of the same protein in each zone, were evidenced with the serum #60 (Figure 4,C). The most acidic IgE-binding proteins (zone 1, pI 4.5-5.0) showed a series of 3 isoforms with a Mr range of about 70-85 kDa. In a 2nd zone (pI 5.2-6.5), an IgE-binding protein with 7 isoforms was detected at about 65 kDa and another with 2 isoforms at 45 kDa (zone 3, pI 5.9-6.0) which might correspond to Zea m 22. The IgE-binding proteins of zone 4 were strongly recognized and had 4 isoforms (pI 6.8-7.6, Mr 45 to 50 kDa). They could correspond to the polygalacturonase Zea m 13. Three single spots IgE binding proteins were also detected at Mr > 94 kDa (zone 5, pI 7.3) and in the basic region (pI 10.6), at 50 (zone 6) and 30 kDa (zone 7). These proteins might correspond respectively to Zea m 4 (reticulin oxidase) and Zea m 1. The seven boxes defining the IgE reactivity zones were copied on Figure 4, A,B. Obviously the same proteins were recognized by patient's IgG and IgE Ab although some differences in binding intensity were observed. For instance the proteins in zone 3 were poorly recognized by IgE and strongly by IgG whereas proteins in zone 5 are equally recognized.

 

 

Discussion

In a general approach to evaluate grass pollen allergy in Madagascar, we clinically and immunochemically explored in a previous study, the IgE reactivity patterns of 65 PAP suffering from symptoms during grass pollinating season against six different wild grass pollen [7]. Since wild and cultivated grasses belong to the same Poaceae family, we worked herein on pollen from the 2 most important cereals cultivated in Madagascar: maize and rice. The allergenic sensitization to maize or rice pollen has been reported [12, 30] but was shown to be lower as compared to wild grass pollen partly due, at least for maize pollen, to a larger size and heavier weight than wild grass pollen grains resulting in a poor air-borne dispersal [31]. In some agricultural regions of Europe [13], the prevalence of sensitization (evaluated by SPT) of PAP attending departments of allergy in hospitals between March and June is about 16% in region where maize is cultivated in medium to high density and was up to 88% for wild grasses. We showed here, by SPT, that the sensitization to maize or rice pollen in the highlands of Madagascar is very high, reaching 60% of patients selected upon clinical symptoms during grass pollinating season. The prevalence of sensitization to 6 different wild grasses tested individually by SPT were reported to be of the same order of magnitude, between 45 to 55% when considered taxon per taxon [7] but 71% for any wild grass pollen. Thus, the epidemiological data are somewhat different with what was found in Europe. Although SPT data might be in favor of cross-reactivity between maize and rice pollen, this trend was not confirmed by immunoblot results that showed more reactivities to maize pollen (85%) than to rice pollen (40%). Since allergen families are shared between maize and rice as well as between wild and cultivated grass pollen, cross-reactivities were expected [16,17, 24, 32-34]. However, some specific sensitization can also occur in maize pollen allergy and rather associated to occupational allergy [14,15]. An absence of cross-reactivity is thus in favor of a genuine specific sensitization as a consequence of a sustained and specific exposure. The IgE bindings observed by immunoblot reflect clinically relevant and irrelevant IgE reactivities whereas SPT evaluates IgE reactivities able to induce mediator release, and thus being closer to clinical relevance. Whether maize (pollen and/or corn kernel) could induce more clinically irrelevant IgE-binding protein as compared to rice (pollen and/or grain) has not yet been studied. Interestingly the high immunoblot reactivity against maize pollen was observed within IgE as well as IgG isotypes whereas in 12% of patients, anti-rice pollen Ab response seemed to be restricted to IgE isotype. This may reflect differential sensitization processes.

 

Cross-reactivities also exist between pollen and grain food that may lead to potential food allergy symptoms. Indeed, 47.7% of the PAP studied herein also display food-allergy symptoms (Table 2) and 43% express IgE against proteins from ground rice extract (unpublished data). Fonseca et al [35] showed different IgE binding proteins profiles in the maize seed extracts depending of the cultivars. In our study, on pollen extracts from 5 selected maize cultivars, only small differences in IgE binding protein profiles were visualized. Consequently, it appeared worthwhile to use the largely cultivated local Meva cultivar for 2D separations. Regarding maize pollen proteins and allergens, very few 2D separation studies were available till now [15, 32]. The IgE binding pattern of the studied serum showed a larger coverage of the maize pollen allergens than what was reported with sera from PAP exposed to maize pollen in greenhouses [32]. Four IgE binding proteins detected could correspond to already characterized allergens: i) the very abundant Zea m 1, known as major pollen allergen of maize [22] and reaching 4% of the extractable protein content [36], ii) the polygalacturonase Zea m 13, iii) Zea m 4, a reticulin oxidase and iv) Zea m 22, an enolase also present in maize seed [35]. Allergens belonging to these protein families have also been described in some other wild and cultivated grass pollen [24] (www.allergome.org). Beside these 4 known proteins, described as the most prominent maize pollen allergens [16, 24], our 2D immunoblots revealed 3 other IgE binding protein zones that remain to identify. No indication of group 5 allergens was evidenced in agreement with some report claiming its absence in maize [34]. Controversially, on its own, the study by van Ree et al [37] showed that group 5 allergen is present in Zea mays pollen. Furthermore, links between Lol p5, Ant o 5, Phl p 5, Sec c 5, Phr a 5, Fes r 5 and Dac g 5 were noted by Mohapatra et al [38], with dominating Pooideae species, compared to Arundineae (Phr a 5) and Panicoideae (Zea m 5). Group 2 allergens were also questioned in maize pollen [34] and, however, reported upon DNA sequencing [39].

 

Our study suggests that cereal pollen allergy - mainly for maize one - should be taken into account more carefully. Indeed, SPT and IgE immunoblots results revealed a high prevalence in Madagascar similar to what is observed for wild grass pollen. Several hypotheses may be raised to understand the results. Firstly an increase of exposure to maize pollen may be incriminated. In Madagascar, like in many other African countries, the part of the maize as cereal feeding source permanently increased. Between 1970 and 2000, the increase of cultivated surfaces was more than 100% for the maize vs. 45% for the local Sorghum [40]. Moreover, peri-urban and urban agricultures are determinant in food supply for many huge cities [41] and in Antananarivo, people are living very close to corn fields used for supplemental food supply. Population is, consequently, more exposed to maize pollen source. In such a way the risk of allergenic sensitization is higher even for non atopic individuals. Indeed, each maize plant produces copious pollen and even though the size of the grains (around 100 µm) could limit its dispersal, it can reach more than 1000 m downwind from the maize crops sources. In most of the cases maize pollen deposition is around 200-400 meters depending of micrometeorological conditions and height of the source [31]. Environmental context is thus of high importance for such grass pollen allergy.

 

Secondly, adjuvant environmental factors like pollution may be incriminated in the observed increased sensitization. Like many huge cities, Antananarivo is deeply polluted (http://siteresources.worldbank.org). Out of 215 towns around the world classified according to - among other parameters - air quality, Antananarivo was at the 213th position in 2007 and 209th in 2012 (www.mercer.com). Air quality measurements from 1996 (INSTN, Madagascar) already attested that, in different parts of the city, the concentrations of lead particles and those issued of combustion exhaust gases (< 10µm) were over WHO recommended standards. The impact of pollution on cultivated plants (www.sei-international.org) and on the increase of allergic disorders is now well documented [42]. Gas and particle pollutants were reported to act on pollen grains, their sub-fragments and on proteins themselves [43,44], altering both inflammatory and immune responses of individuals and exacerbating allergic response [45].

 

 

Conclusion

Several allergenic effects of the pollen issued from the main 2 crops cultivated in the highlands of Madagascar are attested by our study. Some of the main already characterized allergens from both pollen extracts were shown to be recognized by IgE from PAP. Numerous co-reactivities against wild grass and cereal pollen were evidenced. However, specific reactivities were also highlighted, especially for maize pollen allergens. The high prevalence of maize pollen sensitization in this region is likely related to the specific environment characterized by i) a proximity of the population to the allergenic source and ii) a highly polluted urban atmosphere. Such study should help to a better understanding of maize pollen allergy at a broader scale, for different regions in Africa and worldwide, with close environmental and agricultural contexts. The presence of dense urban and peri-urban agriculture could be a high environmental risk factor for people sensitive to maize pollen.

 

 

Competing interests

Authors declare no competing interests.

 

 

Authors’ contributions

Perle Ramavovololona, Dominique Godfrin and Hélène Sénéchal substantially contributed to the acquisition and analysis of the biochemical data. Perle Ramavovololona, Gabriel Peltre and Hélène Sénéchal designed the experiments. Ange C. F. Andrianarisoa initiated the questioning on grass pollen allergy, substantially contributed to the acquisition and analysis of the clinical data. Vololona M. Rakotoarimanana provided pollen material. Pascal Poncet, Jean-Pierre Sutra and Hélène Sénéchal substantially contributed to the analysis and interpretation of results, prepared and wrote the manuscript. All authors critically revised the article and approved the final version.

 

 

Acknowledgments

We would like to warmly thank S. Rakotomamonjy, in charge of a national maize breeding program in Madagascar, for giving precise information on the different maize varieties. We also thank S. Descorps-Declère, Pasteur Institute, Paris, France for his precious help in statistical calculation.

 

 

Tables and figures

Table 1: previously reported allergens from maize and rice pollen. (http://www.allergome.org, http://www.allergen.org, http://www.allerdata.com/ and http://www.meduniwien.ac.at/ allergens/allfam/)

Table 2: clinical data of studied Malagasy PAP (part 1). ND: No Data available. Patients # 66 and 67 are Caucasian/European patients

Table 3: clinical data of studied Malagasy PAP (part 2). ND: No Data available. Patients # 66 and 67 are Caucasian/European patients. Same legend than in table 2

Table 4: percentages of PAP tested positive for SPT and Ig immunoblots (IgG and IgE) for the 2 crops pollen extracts (Zea mays and Oryza sativa). Between brackets: number of tested patients

Figure 1: correlations between IgE reactivities studied by SPT or IgE immunoblots for maize and rice pollen extracts. Each dot (•) represents the result obtained with one patient; ⇫: patient #60; A: SPT maize vs SPT rice; B: IgE immunoblot maize vs IgE immunoblot rice; C: SPT maize vs IgE immunoblot maize; D: SPT rice vs IgE immunoblot rice. SPT response was scored as + positive, if the largest wheal diameter was comprised between 70 to 80% greater than that was produced by the positive control, ++ between 80 to 90% and +++ between 90 to 100%. Results of IgE immunoblot (see reactivity figure 2) are semi quantitatively expressed according to the intensity of the reaction as: -: negative; + positive low; ++ medium; +++ very high.

Figure 2. Most representative patterns from 1D IEF immunoblots for the 2 studied crop pollen extracts. Each strip corresponds to the IgE reactivity from individual allergic patient serum: (A) 49 sera were tested with blotted Zea mays pollen extract; (B) 42 sera were tested with blotted Oryza sativa pollen extracts and (C) Sera # 35 and #36 tested with Oryza sativa pollen extract; results of chimioluminescence obtained after a five-fold reduced exposure time. The IgG reactivity from allergic patient serum were tested (D) with blotted Zea mays pollen extract and (E) with Oryza sativa pollen extract; results of chimioluminescence obtained after a five-fold reduced exposure time. Strips #66 and #67: 2 European/Caucasian allergic patient sera; c: strip incubated with a non-allergy individual serum as control; T: negative control strip with buffer; at the top: serum number; on the left side: pI values

Figure 3: 1D IEF Coomassie blue staining (A) and 1D IEF immunoblots (B) for the pollen of 6 varieties of Zea mays. (1): “Paysanne”, (2): “Volasoa”, (3): “NTS”, (4): “Meva”, (5): Europe, (6): “Tombotsoa”. The proteins from the pollen extracts separated by IEF and blotted were incubated with the serum #60 showing a high IgE reactivity (see Figure 1). pI values are indicated on the left side

Figure 4: 2D analysis of the water-soluble proteins from Zea mays pollen. Pollen extract from Zea mays was submitted to an initial IEF separation followed by SDS-PAGE separations. The gels were either silver stained (A) or transferred on NCas and incubated with pollen-sensitized patient serum #60. IgG (B) or IgE (C) binding were revealed using heavy chain specific Ab coupled to alkaline phosphatase followed by substrate. Boxes on each figure indicate groups of allergens recognized by IgE PAP. pI values (at the top) and Mr (kDa, on the right side) are indicated for each gel

 

 

References

  1. Aubry C, Ramamonjisoa J, Dabat M-H, Rakotoarisoa J, Rakotondraibe J, Rabeharisoa L. Urban agriculture and land use in cities: an approach with the multi-functionality and sustainability concepts in the case of Antananarivo (Madagascar). Land Use Pol. 2012;29(2):429-39. PubMed | Google Scholar

  2. Aubry C, Ramamojisoa J, Dabat M-H, Rakotoarisoa J, Rakotondraibe J, Rabeharisoa L. Agriculture in Antananarivo (Madagascar): an interdisciplinary approach. Nat Sci Soc. 2008;16(1):169-89. PubMed | Google Scholar

  3. Temple L, Moustier P. Functions and constraints of urban and periurban agriculture in three African cities (Yaoundé, Cotonou, Dakar). Agricultures. 2004;13(1):15-22. PubMed | Google Scholar

  4. Beaujard P. The first migrants to Madagascar and their introduction of plants: linguistic and ethnologic evidence. Azania. 2011;46(2):169-89. PubMed | Google Scholar

  5. Miracle MP. The introduction and spread of maize in Africa. J Afr Hist. 1965;6(1):39-5. PubMed | Google Scholar

  6. Ramavovololona P, Ramamonjisoa Z, Rakotonirina S, Rakotoarimanana V, Sénéchal H, Desvaux F-X, et al. Madagascar's main allergenic grasses. Allergy. 2010;65(S92):430. PubMed | Google Scholar

  7. Ramavovololona, Sénéchal H, Zanajaoarimanana R, Ramamonjisoa ZR, Andrianarisoa ACF, Rakotoarimanana VM, et al. Allergy to pollen of six common grasses in the highlands of Madagasca. Current Allergy and Clinical Immunology. 2013 Nov; 2(4):220-22. Google Scholar

  8. Potter PC. Common indoor and outdoor aero-allergens in South-Africa. CME. 2010;28(9):426-32. PubMed | Google Scholar

  9. Sibanda EN. Inhalant allergies in Zimbabwe: a common problem. Int Arch Allergy Immunol. 2003 Jan;130(1):2-9. PubMed | Google Scholar

  10. Westrischnig K, Sibanda E, Thomas W. Analysis of the sensitization profile towards allergens in Central Africa. Clin Exp Allergy. 2003;33:22-7. PubMed | Google Scholar

  11. Ramavovololona. Palynological and immunological study of 8 species of Gramineae and one species of Asteraceae (Compositae) common in Madagascar. [PhD dissertation]. Antananarivo, 1998. PubMed | Google Scholar

  12. Tsai YT, Chen SH, Lin KL, Hsieh KH. Rice pollen allergy in Taiwan. Ann Allergy. 1990 Dec;65(6):459-62. PubMed | Google Scholar

  13. Moneret-Vautrin DA, Peltre G, Gayraud J, Morisset M, Renaudin JM, Martin A. Prevalence of sensitisation to oilseed rape and maize pollens in France: a multi-center study carried out by the Allergo-Vigilance Network. Eur Ann Allergy Clin Immunol. 2012 Dec;44(6):225-35. PubMed | Google Scholar

  14. Sung SY, Lee WY, Yong SJ, Shin KC, Park HS, Kim HM, et al. A case of occupational rhinitis induced by maize pollen exposure in a farmer: Detection of IgE-binding components. Allergy Asthma Immunol Res. 2012 Jan;4(1):49-51. PubMed | Google Scholar

  15. Oldenburg M, Petersen A, Baur X. Maize pollen is an important allergen in occupationally exposed workers. J Occup Med Toxicol. 2011;6:32. PubMed | Google Scholar

  16. Amialis A, Konstantinou GN. Cereal pollen sensitisation in pollen allergic patients: to treat or not to treat? Eur Ann Allergy Clin Immunol. 2011 Mar;43(2):36-44. PubMed | Google Scholar

  17. Hrabina M, Jain K, Gouyon B. Cross reactivity between pollen allergens from common Pooideae grasses and cultivated cereals. Clin Exp Allergy Rev. 2008;8:18-20. PubMed | Google Scholar

  18. Weber RW. Cross-reactivity of pollen allergens. Curr Allergy Asthma Rep. 2004;4(5):401-8. PubMed | Google Scholar

  19. Astwood JD, Mohapatra SS, Ni H, Hill RD. Pollen allergen homologues in barley and other crop species. Clin Exp Allergy. 1995 Jan;25(1):66-72. PubMed | Google Scholar

  20. Wang W, Milanesi C, Faleri C, Cresti M. Localization of group-1 allergen Zea m 1 in the coat and wall of maize pollen. Act Histoch. 2006;108(5):395-400. PubMed | Google Scholar

  21. Xu H, Goulding N, Zhang Y, Swoboda I, Singh MB, Bhalla PL. Promoter region of Ory s 1, the major rice pollen allergen gene. Sex Plant Reprod. 1999;12(2):125-6. PubMed | Google Scholar

  22. Li LC, Bedinger PA, Volk C, Jones AD, Cosgrove DJ. Purification and characterization of four beta-expansins (Zea m 1 isoforms) from maize pollen. Plant Physiol. 2003 Aug;132(4):2073-85. PubMed | Google Scholar

  23. Kovar DR, Drobak BK, Staiger CJ. Maize profilin isoforms are functionally distinct. Plant Cell. 2000 Apr;12(4):583-98. PubMed | Google Scholar

  24. Heiss S, Flicker S, Hamilton DA, Kraft D, Mascarenhas JP, Valenta R. Expression of Zm13, a pollen specific maize protein, in Escherichia coli reveals IgE-binding capacity and allergenic potential. FEBS Letters. 1996;381:217-21. PubMed | Google Scholar

  25. Sénéchal H, Geny S, Desvaux FX, Busson M, Mayer C, Aron Y, et al. Genetics and specific immune response in allergy to birch pollen and food: evidence of a strong, positive association between atopy and the HLA class II allele HLA-DR7. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 1999 Aug;104(2 Pt 1):395-401. PubMed | Google Scholar

  26. Coca AF. Studies in specific hypersensitiveness V: the preparation of fluid extracts and solutions for use the diagnosis and treatment of the allergies with notes of the collection of pollen. J Immunol. 1922;7:163-74. PubMed | Google Scholar

  27. Peltre G, Lapeyre J, David B. Heterogeneity of grass pollen allergens (Dactylis glomerata) recognized by IgE antibodies in human patients sera by a new nitrocellulose immunoprint technique. Immunol Lett. 1982 Sep;5(3):127-31. PubMed | Google Scholar

  28. Blum H, Beier H, Gross HJ. Improved silver staining of plant proteins, RNA and DNA in polyacrylamide gels. Electrophoresis. 1987;8:93-9. PubMed | Google Scholar

  29. Demeulemester C, Peltre G, Laurent M, Panheleux D, David B. Cyanogen bromide-activated nitrocellulose membrane: a new tool for immunoprinting techniques. Electrophoresis. 1987;8(1):71-3. PubMed | Google Scholar

  30. Gonzalo-Garijo MA, Perez-Calderon R, Munoz-Rodriguez A, Tormo-Molina R, Silva-Palacios I. Hypersensitivity to maize pollen. Allergy. 2004 Mar;59(3):365. PubMed | Google Scholar

  31. Jarosz N, Loubet B, Durand B, Foueillassar X, Huber L. Varations in maize pollen emission and deposition in relation to microclimate. Environ Sci Technol. 2005 Jun 15;39(12):4377-84. PubMed | Google Scholar

  32. Petersen A, Dresselhaus T, Grobe K, Becker WM. Proteome analysis of maize pollen for allergy-relevant components. Proteomics. 2006 Dec;6(23):6317-25. PubMed | Google Scholar

  33. van Ree R, van Leeuwen A, Aalberse RC. How far can we simplify in vitro diagnostics for grass pollen allergy?: A study with 17 whole pollen extracts and purified natural and recombinant major allergens. J Allerg Clin Immunol. 1998;102(2):184-90. PubMed | Google Scholar

  34. Niederberger V, Laffer S, Froschl R, Kraft D, Rumpold H, Kapiotis S, et al. IgE antibodies to recombinant pollen allergens (Phl p 1, Phl p 2, Phl p 5, and Bet v 2) account for a high percentage of grass pollen-specific IgE. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 1998 Feb;101(2 Pt 1):258-64. PubMed | Google Scholar

  35. Fonseca C, Planchon S, Pinheiro C, Renaut J, Ricardo CP, Oliveira MM, et al. Maize IgE binding proteins: each plant a different profile? Proteome Sci. 2014;12(1):17. PubMed | Google Scholar

  36. Valdivia ER, Wu Y, Li L-C, Cosgrove DJ, Stephenson AG. A group-1 grass pollen allergen influences the outcome of pollen competition in Maize. PLoS ONE. 2007;2(1):e154. PubMed | Google Scholar

  37. Van Ree R, Driessen MN, Van Leeuwen WA, Stapel SO, Aalberse RC. Variability of crossreactivity of IgE antibodies to group I and V allergens in eight grass pollen species. Clin Exp Allergy. 1992 Jun;22(6):611-7. PubMed | Google Scholar

  38. Mohapatra SS, Lockey RF, Shirley S. Immunobiology of grass pollen allergens. Curr Allergy Asthma Rep. 2005 Sep;5(5):381-7. PubMed | Google Scholar

  39. Soderlund C, Descour A, Kudrna D, Bomhoff M, Boyd L, Currie J, et al. Sequencing, mapping, and analysis of 27,455 maize full-length cDNAs. PLoS Genet. 2009 Nov;5(11):e1000740. PubMed | Google Scholar

  40. Manyong VM, Makinde KO, Coulibaly O. Economic gains from maize varietal research in West and Central Africa an overview. Africa MriWaC, editor. Cotonou, Benin Republic: In: Badu-Apruku, B. Fakorede, MAB, Ouedraogo M, Carsky RJ. and Menkir, A. (ed.); IITA-Cotonou. 2003 14-18 May 2001. 66-68. Google Scholar

  41. Agziabher AG, Lee-Smith D, Maxwell DG, Memon PA, Mougeot LJA, Sawio CJ. 1994 Cities feeding people, an examination of urban agriculture in East Africa: Center IDR, editor. IDRC, Ottawa. 1994; 146. Google Scholar

  42. Kim KH, Jahan SA, Kabir E. A review on human health perspective of air pollution with respect to allergies and asthma. Environ Int. 2013;59:41-52. PubMed | Google Scholar

  43. Rogerieux F, Godfrin D, Sénéchal H, Motta AC, Marlière M, Peltre G, et al. Modifications of Phleum pratense grass pollen allergens following artificial exposure to gaseous air pollutants (O(3), NO(2), SO(2)). Int Arch Allergy Immunol. 2007;143(2):127-34. PubMed | Google Scholar

  44. D'Amato G, Cecchi L, D'Amato M, Liccardi G. Urban air pollution and climate change as environmental risk factors of respiratory allergy: an update. J Investig Allergol Clin Immunol. 2010;20(2):95-102. PubMed | Google Scholar

  45. Saxon A, Diaz-Sanchez D. Air pollution and allergy: you are what you breathe. Nat Immunol. 2005 Mar;6(3):223-6. PubMed | Google Scholar

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


The Pan African Medical Journal articles are archived on Pubmed Central. Access PAMJ archives on PMC here

Volume 28 (September - December 2017)

Article tools

Tables and figures

Table 1: previously reported allergens from maize and rice pollen. (http://www.allergome.org, http://www.allergen.org, http://www.allerdata.com/ and http://www.meduniwien.ac.at/ allergens/allfam/)


Table 2: clinical data of studied Malagasy PAP (part 1). ND: No Data available. Patients # 66 and 67 are Caucasian/European patients


Table 3: clinical data of studied Malagasy PAP (part 2). ND: No Data available. Patients # 66 and 67 are Caucasian/European patients. Same legend than in table 2


Table 4: percentages of PAP tested positive for SPT and Ig immunoblots (IgG and IgE) for the 2 crops pollen extracts (Zea mays and Oryza sativa). Between brackets: number of tested patients


Figure 1: correlations between IgE reactivities studied by SPT or IgE immunoblots for maize and rice pollen extracts. Each dot (•) represents the result obtained with one patient; ⇫: patient #60; A: SPT maize vs SPT rice; B: IgE immunoblot maize vs IgE immunoblot rice; C: SPT maize vs IgE immunoblot maize; D: SPT rice vs IgE immunoblot rice. SPT response was scored as + positive, if the largest wheal diameter was comprised between 70 to 80% greater than that was produced by the positive control, ++ between 80 to 90% and +++ between 90 to 100%. Results of IgE immunoblot (see reactivity figure 2) are semi quantitatively expressed according to the intensity of the reaction as: -: negative; + positive low; ++ medium; +++ very high


Figure 2. Most representative patterns from 1D IEF immunoblots for the 2 studied crop pollen extracts. Each strip corresponds to the IgE reactivity from individual allergic patient serum: (A) 49 sera were tested with blotted Zea mays pollen extract; (B) 42 sera were tested with blotted Oryza sativa pollen extracts and (C) Sera # 35 and #36 tested with Oryza sativa pollen extract; results of chimioluminescence obtained after a five-fold reduced exposure time. The IgG reactivity from allergic patient serum were tested (D) with blotted Zea mays pollen extract and (E) with Oryza sativa pollen extract; Strips #66 and #67: 2 European/Caucasian allergic patient sera; c: strip incubated with a non-allergy individual serum as control; T: negative control strip with buffer; at the top: serum number; on the left side: pI values


Figure 3: 1D IEF Coomassie blue staining (A) and 1D IEF immunoblots (B) for the pollen of 6 varieties of Zea mays. (1): “Paysanne”, (2): “Volasoa”, (3): “NTS”, (4): “Meva”, (5): Europe, (6): “Tombotsoa”. The proteins from the pollen extracts separated by IEF and blotted were incubated with the serum #60 showing a high IgE reactivity (see Figure 1). pI values are indicated on the left side


Figure 4: 2D analysis of the water-soluble proteins from Zea mays pollen. Pollen extract from Zea mays was submitted to an initial IEF separation followed by SDS-PAGE separations. The gels were either silver stained (A) or transferred on NCas and incubated with pollen-sensitized patient serum #60. IgG (B) or IgE (C) binding were revealed using heavy chain specific Ab coupled to alkaline phosphatase followed by substrate. Boxes on each figure indicate groups of allergens recognized by IgE PAP. pI values (at the top) and Mr (kDa, on the right side) are indicated for each gel


Rate this article

Altmetric

PAMJ is a member of the Committee on Publication Ethics
Next abstract

PAMJ is published in collaboration with the African Field Epidemiology Network (AFENET)
Currently tracked by: DOAJ, AIM, Google Scholar, AJOL, EBSCO, Scopus, Embase, IC, HINARI, Global Health, PubMed Central, PubMed/Medline, Ulrichsweb, More to come . Member of COPE.

ISSN: 1937-8688. © 2017 - Pan African Medical Journal. All rights reserved