Home | Volume 35 | Article number 58

Case report

Sarcoma undifferentiated (unclassified) fusiform cell type of mesentery: a case report and literature review

Sarcoma undifferentiated (unclassified) fusiform cell type of mesentery: a case report and literature review

Korbi Ibtissem1, Korbi Asma2,&, Ennaceur Farouk1, Hajji Ahmed2, Njima Manel3, Boughanmi Faiez1, Zouari Khadija1, Faleh Raja2

 

1Department of General and Digestive Surgery, University Hospital of Monastir, Monastir, Tunisia, 2Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital of Monastir, Monastir, Tunisia, 3Department of Pathology, University Hospital of Monastir, Monastir, Tunisia

 

 

&Corresponding author
Korbi Asma, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital of Monastir, Monastir, Tunisia

 

 

Abstract

Sarcomas are a heterogeneous group of malignant tumors that come from mesenchymal tissues. Undifferentiated sarcoma represents approximately 20% of soft tissue sarcomas. This entity represents approximately 20% of soft tissue sarcomas. These tumors are subdivided according to their appearance. Morphological in 4 subtypes: pleomorphic cells, fusiform cells, round cells, epithelioids. We report the case of a 72-year-old woman operated for a complicated adnexal tumor, but it turned out that it was sarcoma undifferentiated (unclassified) fusiform cell type of mesentery. It is a rare and a latent tumor. Its diagnosis is histological. Its treatment consists on surgical wide excision if possible. This type of sarcoma has a poor prognosis considering the limited benefits of radio-chemotherapy. Undifferentiated sarcoma type fusiform cells of the mesentery is an exceptional entity. Its diagnosis is difficult. Its treatment is to discuss case by case, surgery is the best option if it is possible. The prognosis is bad. This entity remains to be studied.

 

 

Introduction    Down

Sarcomas are a heterogeneous group of malignant tumors that come from mesenchymal tissues [1]. The term undifferentiated sarcoma is used to refer to malignant mesenchymal tumors that do not meet the criteria for a well-defined histopathological entity [2]. This entity represents approximately 20% of soft tissue sarcomas [1]. These tumors are subdivided according to their appearance. Morphological in 4 subtypes: pleomorphic cells, fusiform cells, round cells, epithelioids [3]. They are considered to be high-grade sarcomas and have a poor prognosis [1]. Sarcomas usually develop at the expense of deep soft tissues of the extremities (50%) and retroperitoneal (15%) and intra-abdominal tissues. Apart from gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST), intraabdominal sarcomas represent only (5 to 10%), but mesenteric localization is much rarer [4]. We report the case of an undifferentiated mesenteric sarcoma with fusiform cells.

 

 

Patient and observation Up    Down

This is a 72-year-old woman with a history of hypothyroidism, hypertension, atrial fibrillation (ACFA), ischemic stroke 3 years ago with left hemiparesis, cavum cancer 1 year ago treated with radiotherapy. She consulted the emergency room for pelvic pain that had been changing for 1 day. On examination we found an afebrile patient, with a PA at 16/08, a pulse at 100 bpm. On abdominal examination we found an abdominopelvic mass of 15*10 cm. A biology Hb = 7.1, GB = 9600, creatinine = 102, urea = 8. Abdominal computed tomography (CT) without contrast injection was reported for renal failure, which showed a pelvic mass of 15*10 cm probably necrotic (Figure 1). The diagnosis of a complicated adnexal tumor was suspected, hence the decision to operate the patient urgently. It was operated medianly. On exploration, we found a mass of 13 cm at the expense of the necrotic small hail adhering to the peritoneum at the level of the pelvis (Figure 2). A 30 cm resection of the small bowel was performed with a small-bowel anastomosis at the mechanical forceps. The patient was transferred to the postoperative unit where she received adequate transfusion and resuscitation. The postoperative course was simple with a dietary recovery at day 5. The patient was discharged 15 days postoperatively. Histopathological examination found spindle-cell type undifferentiated (unclassified) sarcoma with healthy resection margins (Figure 3, Figure 4).

 

 

Discussion Up    Down

The mesentery is a frequent propagation pathway for malignant tumors through the peritoneal cavity, on the other hand, primary mesenteric tumors are rare and predominantly benign [5]. The most frequent primary mesenteric tumors are desmoid tumors [6]. Other rarer tumors such as sarcomas are also found. Histologically, and according to the 4th edition of the classification of soft tissue and bone tumors of 2013, sarcomas are subdivided into several subtypes according to their differentiation (adipose, fibrohystiocytic, smooth or striated muscle, vascular ...) and sarcomas of uncertain differentiation. Recently a new chapter has emerged: that of undifferentiated or unclassified sarcomas [1]. In fact, the diagnosis of undifferentiated sarcoma can only be retained after eliminating all lines of recognizable differentiations [1, 3, 4]. This entity groups together 4 subtypes: cell pleomorphic (formerly called malignant fibrous histiocytoma), round cell, epithelioid, spindle-shaped cells as is the case in our patient [3]. Label a sarcoma as being undifferentiated and specify its type is not so obvious despite the fact that it has an implication in the local treatment of this tumor and an impact on the prognosis [3, 7]. In addition, the interpretation of the pathologist can be significantly influenced by the availability of resources and tools to specify a certain line of differentiation [3, 8] such as context, experience, biopsy size, immunohistochemistry availability, electron microscopy and molecular biology [1, 3, 9]. Patients may present with abdominal pain, an abdomino-pelvic mass of transit disorders, anorexia or weight loss and are rarely complicated by intussusception, perforation or suppuration [10, 11, 12]. Undifferentiated/unclassified sarcomas pleomorphic cells such as fusiform cells affect in particular elderly patients [1, 3]. Round-cell sarcomas are more common in young patients in whom sarcoma associated with translocation must be sought [1, 2, 13]. According to Fletcheret et al. [3], the sub classifications of fusiform cell-type sarcomas does not have a great relevance compared to round-cell sarcomas made of their poor prognosis and limited therapeutic options and their low chemo-sensitivity. The only two subtypes of non-fusiform cell-type sarcomas for which there may be significant therapeutic involvement are: monophasic synovial sarcoma, sensitive to chemotherapy (ifosfamide), and the Gleevec-sensitive fibrosarcomatous variant (in the context of local disease) or metastatic) [3]. Concerning the diagnosis, the CT scan can be useful in providing the tissue characteristics of tumors and its reports of a mesenteric tumor [6]. According to Faizi et al., magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is the most performing in the diagnosis of mesenteric sarcomas with the possibility of predicting the benign or malignant nature of tumors and even the histological type and positron-emission tomography (PET) scan finds a place in the context of sarcomas with ganglionic extension on MRI [14]. As any intra-abdominal sarcoma, the diagnosis is histological. In cases where sarcoma is locally limited, non-metastatic or with resectable liver metastases, treatment is surgical wide excision with healthy margins is the rule unlike dementia or with unresectable metastases or curative surgery is no longer an option with an unfortunate prognosis considering the limited benefits of radio-chemotherapy [4, 15].

 

 

Conclusion Up    Down

Undifferentiated or unclassified sarcoma is a new entity that accounts for 20% of soft tissue sarcomas and 25% of irradiated tissue sarcomas. Its mesenteric localization is rare. In this context the undifferentiated sarcoma type fusiform cells of the mesentery is an exceptional entity. Its diagnosis is difficult. Its treatment is to discuss case by case, surgery is the best option if it is possible. The prognosis is bad. This entity remains to be studied.

 

 

Competing interests Up    Down

The authors declare no competing interests.

 

 

Authors’ contributions Up    Down

Ennaceur Farouk, Boughanmi Faiez: conception and design, acquisition of data; Korbi Ibtissem, Korbi Asma, Hajji Ahmed, Njima Manel: analysis and interpretation of data; Korbi Ibtissem, Korbi Asma, Ennaceur Farouk: drafting the article; Zouari Khadija, Faleh Raja: final approval. All the authors have read and agreed to the final manuscript.

 

 

Figures Up    Down

Figure 1: CT aspect of the mass

Figure 2: per operative photo of the mass

Figure 3: mesenteric dense cellular proliferation (HEx40)

Figure 4: proliferation formation of spindle cells with moderately nuclear atypia and numerous mitoses (Hex400)

 

 

References Up    Down

  1. Jo VY, Fletcher CDM. WHO classification of soft tissue tumours: an update based on the 2013 (4th) edition. Pathology (Phila). 2014; 46(2): 95-104. PubMed | Google Scholar

  2. Alaggio R, Bisogno G, Rosato A, Ninfo V, Coffin CM. Undifferentiated sarcoma: does it exist: a clinicopathologic study of 7 pediatric cases and review of literature. Hum Pathol. 2009; 40(11): 1600-1610. PubMed | Google Scholar

  3. Fletcher CD. Undifferentiated sarcomas: what to do? And does it matter? A surgical pathology perspective. Ultrastruct Pathol. 2008; 32(2): 31-36. PubMed | Google Scholar

  4. Liles JS, Tzeng C-WD, Short JJ, Kulesza P, Heslin MJ. Retroperitoneal and intra-abdominal sarcoma. Curr Probl Surg. 2009; 46(6): 445-503. PubMed | Google Scholar

  5. Diaz-Beveridge R, Melian M, Zac C, Navarro E, Akhoundova D, Chrivella M et al. Primary Mesenteric Undifferentiated Pleomorphic Sarcoma Masquerading as a Colon Carcinoma: a case report and review of the literature. Case Rep Oncol Med. 2015; 2015: 532656. PubMed | Google Scholar

  6. Sheth S, Horton KM, Garland MR, Fishman EK. Mesenteric neoplasms: CT appearances of primary and secondary tumors and differential diagnosis. Radiographic. 2003; 23(2): 457-473. PubMed | Google Scholar

  7. Matushansky I, Charytonowicz E, Mills J, Siddiqi S, Hricik T, Cordon-Cardo C. MFH classification: differentiating undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma in the 21st Century. Expert Rev Anticancer Ther. 2009; 9(8): 1135-1144. PubMed | Google Scholar

  8. Walther C, Domanski HA, von Steyern FV, Mandahl N, Mertens F. Chromosome banding analysis of cells from fine-needle aspiration biopsy samples from soft tissue and bone tumors: is it clinically meaningful. Cancer Genet. 2011; 204(4): 203-20. PubMed | Google Scholar

  9. Goldblum JR. An approach to pleomorphic sarcomas: can we subclassify, and does it matter. Mod Pathol. 2014 Jan; 27 Suppl 1: S39-46. PubMed | Google Scholar

  10. Sheth S, Horton KM, Garland MR, Fishman EK. Mesenteric neoplasms: CT appearances of primary and secondary tumors and differential diagnosis. Radiogr Rev Publ Radiol Soc N Am Inc. 2003; 23(2): 457-473. PubMed | Google Scholar

  11. Weinberger HA, Ahmed MS. Mesenchymal solid tumors of the omentum and mesentery: report of four cases. Surgery. 1977; 82(5): 754-759. PubMed | Google Scholar

  12. Salemis NS, Gourgiotis S, Tsiambas E, Panagiotopoulos N, Karameris A, Tsohataridis E. Primary intra-abdominal malignant fibrous histiocytoma: a highly aggressive tumor. J Gastrointest Cancer. 2010; 41(4): 238-242. PubMed | Google Scholar

  13. Maghrebi H, Batti R, Zehani A, Chrait N, Rais H, Makni A et al. Round cell sarcoma of the colon with CIC rearrangement. BMC Res Notes. 2017; 10(1): 582. PubMed | Google Scholar

  14. Faizi NA, Thulkar S, Sharma R, Sharma S, Chandrashekhara S, Shukla NK et al. Magnetic resonance imaging and positron emission tomography-computed tomography evaluation of soft tissue sarcoma with surgical and histopathological correlation. Indian J Nucl Med IJNM Off J Soc Nucl Med India. 2012; 27(4): 213-220. PubMed | Google Scholar

  15. Adjuvant chemotherapy for localised resectable soft-tissue sarcoma of adults: meta-analysis of individual data: sarcoma Meta-analysis Collaboration. Lancet Lond Engl. 1997; 350(9092): 1647-1654. PubMed