The Pan African Medical Journal

Reviewers

The medical open access literature is growing exponentially. New journal appear almost everyday and will compete, not only to attract submissions, but to attract and maintain a pool of experience and valuable reviewers. We know what it takes to review a manuscript; journals target high profile professionals; they are usually very busy and have competing priorities. Reviewers play an undeniable role in maintaining the quality of scientific publication. We are always looking for enthusiastic professionals to review the manuscripts submitted to our journal; you don't need to be a highly qualify professional; a high level of scientific integrity and a some experience in public health, epidemiology, research and allied science associated with some training in literature review is a good start. So we gratefully invite you to become a reviewer for the Pan African Medical Journal; by filling the form below , you will be added to the PAMJ Reviewer Database.

The editorial team would like to acknowledge the following for their contribution.

Reviewers for: Year 2010 | All years

Boonacker Chantal, Netherlands
Burger Lene , South Africa
Chichom Alain, Cameroon
Clauss Francois, France
Corbi Cecile , France
Hanlon Charlotte, Ethiopia
Harding Marguerite, Australia
Hussain Nahin, United Kingdom
Kamadjeu Raoul, United States
Kingue Samuel, Cameroon
Kulcsar Zsolt, Hungary
Loeffler Jutta, United Kingdom
Muthukumar Dr. N, India
Nardi Dr P, Italy
Olindo Stephane, Martinique
Shakya Vikal Chandra , Nepal
Thakker Hardik, India
Uzochukwu Uzoma Aniebue, Nigeria

Pamj review process

Articles are received through an online manuscript submission system. Three to five reviewers are invited for each submission. Reviewers agreeing to review the manuscript will be provided with credentials to access the reviewer space and download the submission material. Reviewers comments will be returned via the online review system and immediately forwarded to the corresponding author. Based on reviewer comments, the manuscript will be either accepted after correction or not accepted. Upon receipt of authors corrections and agreement of reviewers (at least 2 over 3), the manuscript will be published without any further delay. The final formatted PDF version will be posted as soon as it becomes available.
Download an overview of Pamj review process (Pdf).

Material for reviewers

Becoming a reviewer

The PAMJ is always looking for enthusiastic, experienced and dedicated professionals to review the multiple manuscripts we received every year. By filling this form, you will be automatically added to the PAMJ Reviewer Database. Provide complete information, including a short bios ketch including your past and current experience, your work interest and your current affiliation; this information will help us target your review and will be passed to the corresponding author with the review report. This is an attempt to make the authors as comfortable as possible on the ability and qualifications of the reviewers to review their submission and also, to promote greater accountability in our open review process.

Helping young researchers acquiring scientific writing skills is a concept we hold dear; for this reason we will try to encourage as much as possible, direct interactions between reviewers and authors.

*Compulsory

First name*

Last name*

Email*

Expertise (Scroll to select)*

Short biosketch:*

Tell us a little bit about yourself. Also include a list of your most recent articles published in peer-review journals (if more than 5, limit the list to 5 most recent)

Country*

Type this code in the field below. (the code shows only numbers and/or capital letters). If you can't see the characters, refresh the image by clicking on the double arrow.
Click here to learn more about spams and other internet robots.

Code*